Politics: National Security

Musical Chairs in National Security Leadership

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
June 27, 2011, 4:45 p.m.

A sur­vey of 90 Dems and 93 GOP­ers on Na­tion­al Journ­al’s Pol. In­siders pan­el (10/9 is­sue).

Which Party Cmte Is Do­ing A Bet­ter Job In The Run-Up To The Midterm Elec­tions?

Nat’l:

- Dems GOP­ers DNC 78% 73% RNC 17 15 Tie/neither 6 12

Sen­ate:

- Dems GOP­ers DSCC 66% 13% NR­SC 31 85 Tie/neither 3 2

House:

- Dems GOP­ers DCCC 58% 15% NR­CC 40 78 Tie/neither 2 7

I have be­come an ex­cel­lent tea-leaf read­er this spring. As I watch col­lege gradu­ates cross the stage on com­mence­ment day—tee­ter­ing in new heels, arms out­stretched to grasp their hard-earned dip­lo­mas—I study the ter­ror in their eyes.

And as I watch two party nom­in­ees stride onto their stages—theme songs blar­ing, huge Amer­ic­an flags be­hind them—I study the am­bi­tion in their eyes.

On col­lege cam­puses and on the cam­paign trail, the prin­cipals think they have a plan but also know it could eas­ily be knocked off course by events al­most en­tirely out of their con­trol. If you are a gradu­at­ing seni­or this spring, that might in­clude the dreaded pro­spect of mov­ing back home, burdened with stu­dent-loan debt. If you are Pres­id­ent Obama, that could mean mov­ing back home to Chica­go.

But will this be a sober stan­doff over eco­nom­ic stress and solu­tions? Or are we just as likely to spend the rest of this year con­sumed with the latest ut­ter­ances of Jeremi­ah Wright and Don­ald Trump?

This elec­tion has been plagued with dis­trac­tions that, for a day or a week at a time, have con­spired to knock two nor­mally well-dis­cip­lined can­did­ates off course.

Do not be­lieve for a mo­ment that the can­did­ates’ camps in Bo­ston or Chica­go do not have grand plans. They do. And they in­clude pub­lic maps of win­nable states, secret maps of win­nable states, ex­traordin­ary mi­cro-tar­get­ing strategies, and me­tic­u­lous grass­roots mo­bil­iz­a­tion plans. But be­cause each fears that the oth­er will raise more money, deep pock­ets will al­ways be wel­come.

Wel­come, Shel­don Ad­el­son and Don­ald Trump. Wel­come, Anna Win­tour and Sarah Jes­sica Park­er. Elit­ism has its priv­ileges. No one will turn down the cash as long as the Su­preme Court says that it’s leg­al, so the celebrity mud-throw­ing is largely be­side the point. So too, mostly, is the end­less hand-wringing about vice pres­id­en­tial picks. Each can­did­ate knows voters mostly view the No. 2 as a re­flec­tion on the No. 1.

But this cam­paign is this close. On an al­most weekly basis, the un­ex­pec­ted and the un­con­trol­lable have threatened every well-laid plan. The trouble is, no one knows what will mat­ter and what won’t, so they have to re­spond to everything.

Seni­or Rom­ney ad­viser Ed Gillespie, a vet­er­an of many GOP cam­paign war rooms, calls these dis­trac­tions “shiny ob­jects.”

“I have not worked in a cam­paign with more shiny ob­jects than this one,” he told a small group of re­port­ers this week. “It’s pretty re­mark­able to me the kind of things that flare up and people start chas­ing. We’ve dis­cip­lined ourselves on the Rom­ney cam­paign to, as best we can, not chase the rab­bits or get dis­trac­ted by the shiny ob­jects.”

This is ac­tu­ally kind of vir­tu­ous, as far as it goes. Rom­ney has largely man­aged to avoid the muck of the dis­cred­ited birth­er de­bate, but he doesn’t mind shar­ing the stage with some of the folks who keep it alive.

The Demo­crats, of course, are no less likely to take a sharp poke when they can. When asked this week about wheth­er the pres­id­ent was vul­ner­able to Re­pub­lic­an charges that he was spend­ing too much time hob­nob­bing with celebrit­ies—earn­ing the Rush Limbaugh la­bel “Barack Kar­dashi­an”—White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney told re­port­ers trav­el­ing on Air Force One (to one of those glit­tery parties),”Two words: Don­ald Trump. Next ques­tion.”

It’s not that the cam­paigns don’t know how to avoid po­ten­tial potholes when they see them. Neither Pres­id­ent Obama nor Rom­ney was par­tic­u­larly in­ter­ested, for in­stance, in ty­ing him­self too closely to the out­come of Wis­con­sin’s failed, par­tis­an ef­fort to re­call Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Scott Walk­er.

“I don’t know if at the end of the day, it helped or hurt or made any dif­fer­ence at all,” Gillespie said on Wed­nes­day morn­ing as the mar­gin of vic­tory be­came clear. “They are tea leaves, but at the end of the day, the elec­tion yes­ter­day was about Gov­ernor Walk­er, his agenda, his re­forms, the uni­on ef­forts to over­turn them, and about Wis­con­sin.”

On this par­tic­u­lar morn­ing at least, Car­ney and Gillespie were on the same page. “I cer­tainly wouldn’t read much in­to yes­ter­day’s res­ult,” the White House press sec­ret­ary said, “bey­ond its ef­fect on who’s oc­cupy­ing the gov­ernor’s seat in Wis­con­sin.”

But Obama signaled this week that he is more than aware of the po­ten­tial that his first four years in of­fice will be boiled down to the dregs of the tea leaves.

“What they’re go­ing to do is they’re go­ing to say, “˜Well, you know what, you’re still not sat­is­fied and it’s Obama’s fault,’ “ he told sup­port­ers at a Cali­for­nia fun­drais­ing event. “That’s the es­sence of their cam­paign. It’s very easy to put on a bump­er stick­er: ‘It’s Obama’s Fault.’ “

His sup­port­ers laughed. Obama looked stern. He ought to in a year when bright and shiny ob­jects rule.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
5 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
6 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

FULL CABINET IN PLACE
Acosta Confirmed As Labor Secretary
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Alexander Acosta was confirmed Thursday night as Labor secretary, officially filling out President Trump's cabinet on day 98 of his presidency. Nine Democrats joined every present Republican in voting to approve Acosta, with the final tally at 60-38. Trump's first choice for Labor secretary, Andrew Puzder, withdrew his nomination after taking criticism for hiring undocumented workers and for other matters in his personal life.

Source:
HAS WHITE HOUSE BACKING
Hurd to Make Push on Federal IT
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX) plans to introduce legislation today designed to help federal agencies update their aging technology—and this time, it has White House backing. Hurd worked alongside White House Office of American Innovation officials Reed Cordish and Chris Liddell in crafting and tweaking the legislation, and called their partnership an 'invaluable' part of the process."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login