National Security

On the Ground: Understanding the Drawdown in Afghanistan

Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
June 28, 2011, 3:51 p.m.

State Rep. Robert Bent­ley (R) “said it’s ab­surd to be talk­ing about his name” when 200K Alabami­ans “are out of work and a fed­er­al grand jury has in­dicted 11 State House fig­ures on charges of vote buy­ing on pro-gambling le­gis­la­tion.”

Want More On This Race? Check out the Hot­line Dash­board for a com­pre­hens­ive run­down of this race, in­clud­ing stor­ies, polls, ads, FEC num­bers, and more!

Bent­ley, on Ag. Com­mis. Ron Sparks‘s (D) latest ra­dio ad: “This is a des­per­ate at­tempt by my op­pon­ent to de­tract at­ten­tion away from the fact that he is on the wrong side of the is­sues that really mat­ter to Alabami­ans (Rawls, AP, 10/8).

Sparks’s ads “as well as Bent­ley re­cently call­ing Sparks the ‘most lib­er­al’” Dem who has “ever run” for gov “come after prom­ises from both Sparks and Bent­ley to run pos­it­ive cam­paigns and stay away from neg­at­ive tac­tics this elec­tion sea­son.”

Sparks: “Things haven’t changed at all for us and what we are do­ing. We have made a con­trast between Robert Bent­ley and us this en­tire time. He con­demns gam­ing, but he takes money from gam­ing sources.”

Sparks “said Bent­ley took money” from MS Gov. Haley Bar­bour‘s (R) PAC which Sparks “said has re­ceived money from gam­ing in­terests in­clud­ing the Choctaw In­di­ans.” Bent­ley “has taken money” from “ori­gin­al” Green­et­rack in­vestor Paul Bry­ant Jr and “used Bry­ant’s plane to travel to cam­paign ap­pear­ances.” Bent­ley spokes­per­son Re­bekah Ma­son “said the Bent­ley cam­paign paid for the use of the plane.”

Bent­ley “said he did re­ceive” a $10K “dona­tion from Green­et­rack, but re­turned it when he dis­covered it.” Bent­ley: “In light of Monday’s bingo-re­lated fed­er­al in­dict­ments … this is a des­per­ate at­tempt by my op­pon­ent to de­tract at­ten­tion away from his own cam­paign fin­ances” (Chand­ler, Birm­ing­ham News, 10/8).

Let’s get a few things straight about the eco­nomy.

First, noth­ing is fine. Not in re­l­at­ive terms. Not in ab­so­lute terms. That things could be worse does not make them fine.

Second, the pub­lic sec­tor is not sep­ar­ate from the private sec­tor any more than your arm is sep­ar­ate from your leg.

Third, the pub­lic sec­tor alone can­not re­vive the private sec­tor. The growth of pub­lic-sec­tor jobs can­not be and has nev­er been the en­gine of sus­tained eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery. In the Great De­pres­sion and the first stage of this Great Re­ces­sion, in­creased pub­lic spend­ing pre­ven­ted more dire eco­nom­ic con­sequences and provided a tem­por­ary life­line.

Fourth, private-sec­tor job growth feeds pub­lic-sec­tor job growth. You need the tax rev­en­ue to pay for all those teach­ers and cops.

Fifth, all of these truths will soon be over­shad­owed by un­fun­ded pen­sion li­ab­il­it­ies — the prom­ises made to pub­lic em­ploy­ees that can’t be met un­less more rev­en­ue is raised or more be­ne­fits are cut.

After telling the coun­try on Fri­day that the “private sec­tor is fine,” Pres­id­ent Obama back­tracked and his loy­al­ists de­con­struc­ted the gaffe by say­ing it needed con­text. Com­pared to pub­lic-sec­tor hir­ing, private-sec­tor job cre­ation has been more ro­bust.

That’s true. In the 17 cat­egor­ies of em­ploy­ment the Bur­eau of Labor Stat­ist­ics meas­ures, only three saw an in­crease in un­em­ploy­ment rate from May 2011 to May 2012: “in­form­a­tion” (7.3 per­cent to 7.8 per­cent), “ag­ri­cul­ture and re­lated private wage and salary work­ers”  (8.7 per­cent to 9.5 per­cent), and “gov­ern­ment work­ers” (3.9 per­cent to 4.2 per­cent).

Mitt Rom­ney sug­ges­ted on Fri­day that the “mes­sage of Wis­con­sin” (mean­ing Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Scott Walk­er’s re­buff of a re­call) was that the na­tion doesn’t need more fire­fight­ers, po­lice, and teach­ers. Or at least that’s the way Obama’s team has been char­ac­ter­iz­ing it ever since, ac­cus­ing Rom­ney of want­ing to lay off even more state and loc­al gov­ern­ment work­ers. Rom­ney’s sur­rog­ates have also pleaded for con­text, ar­guing as Rom­ney him­self did on Tues­day that he meant the na­tion doesn’t need more fed­er­al funds in­ves­ted in short-term state and mu­ni­cip­al hir­ing schemes.

But both Rom­ney and Obama haven’t ad­equately ex­plained the prob­lem. To his cred­it, Walk­er said the “mes­sage” of his pen­sion re­forms wasn’t that there should be few­er state em­ploy­ees. Just the op­pos­ite. Walk­er said his pen­sion re­forms al­lowed the state to keep more people on the payroll. “Our re­forms al­lowed us to pro­tect fire­fight­ers, po­lice of­ficers, and teach­ers,” Walk­er said on CBS’s Face the Na­tion. “That’s not what I think of when I think of big gov­ern­ment.”

Con­text, con­text, my king­dom for some con­text! The es­sen­tial ques­tion on the fu­ture of the state and loc­al gov­ern­ment work­force (87 per­cent of all gov­ern­ment work­ers, by the way) isn’t the num­ber of jobs. It’s their pen­sions. Walk­er saw that. Obama and Rom­ney bet­ter fig­ure this out: You can’t dis­cuss eco­nom­ic growth and state and loc­al payrolls (up or down) un­less you dis­cuss un­fun­ded pen­sion li­ab­il­it­ies and the tox­ic ef­fect they have.

Ac­cord­ing to the most re­cent data from Wilshire Con­sult­ing and North­west­ern Uni­versity’s Kel­logg School of Man­age­ment, un­fun­ded li­ab­il­it­ies for the na­tion’s 126 largest pub­lic pen­sion plans range from $3.2 tril­lion to $7 tril­lion. Why the wide vari­ance? The lower li­ab­il­ity total re­flects op­tim­ist­ic as­sump­tions by state and loc­al pen­sion man­agers on rates of in­vest­ment re­turn. The high­er es­tim­ate re­flects more-cau­tious in­vest­ment as­sump­tions. An­oth­er grim stat­ist­ic: The 126 plans cur­rently fund only 74 per­cent of their li­ab­il­it­ies. In 2001, they fun­ded 95 per­cent.

To fund state and loc­al pen­sions at their cur­rent rate (us­ing the pess­im­ist­ic num­ber above and as­sum­ing no re­duc­tions in cur­rent or fu­ture be­ne­fits), each house­hold would face a tax in­crease of $1,398 a year for the next 30 years. These high­er taxes would not hire an­oth­er teach­er or build an­oth­er fire sta­tion. And they would be on top of rev­en­ue gen­er­ated by his­tor­ic trends in state and loc­al eco­nom­ic growth.

Why does this mat­ter? Ask voters in San Jose and San Diego.

In San Jose, Cal­if., li­ab­il­it­ies rose from $73 mil­lion in 2001 to $245 mil­lion this year, so Demo­crat­ic May­or Chuck Reed had to lay off 1,592 work­ers. In San Diego, pen­sion costs grew from $137 mil­lion in 2006 to $231 mil­lion in 2012; this year alone, 1,500 teach­ers have been laid off.

Both cit­ies over­whelm­ingly passed ini­ti­at­ives to re­duce pen­sion al­loc­a­tions. San Jose voted to trim cur­rent be­ne­fits. San Diego voted to cut back on fu­ture ones. Court fights nat­ur­ally en­sued. But the polit­ic­al winds are clear and un­mis­tak­able. The fight is on.

What happened in Wis­con­sin won’t stay in Wis­con­sin. It won’t stay in San Jose or San Diego, either.

That’s the real con­text of the fu­ture of the en­tire eco­nomy — pub­lic sec­tor and private sec­tor.

What We're Following See More »
Dem Senator Calls North Korea Briefing “Sobering”
6 hours ago
Pai Announces Plans to Roll Back Net Neutrality
8 hours ago

"Even as he acknowledged the importance of an open internet, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai on Wednesday set his telecom agency on a course to scrap the tough, broad net neutrality protections imposed by the Obama administration. During a major speech in Washington, D.C., Pai outlined the need for a total revision of existing federal rules that seek to prevent companies like AT&T, Charter, Comcast and Verizon from blocking or slowing down web content, including the movie or music offerings from their competitors." Separately, Pai told Reason's Nick Gillespie that the Clinton Administration "basically got it right when it came to digital infrastructure. We were not living in a digital dystopia in the years leading up to 2015."

White House to Continue Paying Obamacare Insurers
8 hours ago
White House Proposes New Tax Plan
8 hours ago

The White House on Wednesday laid out its plan for tax reform, with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin saying it would be "the biggest tax cut and the largest tax reform in the history of our country." The tax code would be broken down into just three tax brackets, with the highest personal income tax rate cut from 39.6 percent to 35 percent. The plan would also slash the tax rate on corporations and small businesses from 35 percent to 15 percent. "The White House plan is a set of principles with few details, but it’s designed to be the starting point of a major push to urge Congress to pass a comprehensive tax reform package this year," said National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn.

DHS Launches Office for Victims of Crimes by Immigrants
8 hours ago

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement today established the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE), as called for in a presidential executive order from January. The new office's website states that its staff "will be guided by a singular, straightforward mission—to ensure victims and their families have access to releasable information about a perpetrator and to offer assistance explaining the immigration removal process."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.