Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D) “said getting women and seniors to show up at the polls is key to her re-election hopes” 10/7.
Want More On This Race? Check out the Hotline Dashboard for a comprehensive rundown of this race, including stories, polls, ads, FEC numbers, and more!
Lincoln: “(They) sometimes are the category of people that in a mid-term election are less likely to come out in the numbers that they’ve come out in a presidential year.” She “said she hopes for a large voter turnout — one that would include more than just people voting out of anger.”
Lincoln: “Expectations have been heightened in presidential years, and you get to a mid-term and people that are most likely to be angry or upset are people who wanted something to happen overnight. And it’s not going to happen overnight. So they’re more likely, perhaps, to come out. People that are practical and realize that nothing happens instantly or overnight might be complacent and say, ‘Well, it doesn’t really matter.’”
Rep. John Boozman (R-03) “said a large turnout actually would favor him.” Boozman: “As I go around all over the state … the people of Arkansas are very upset with the administration. They’re upset that instead of agreeing with the views of Arkansans, she’s voted with the administration 95 percent of the time” (Lyon, Arkansas News Bureau, 10/7).
Lincoln, on trailing Boozman in polling: “I’ve never been a fan of polls, though some members of my staff are. The thing to remember is that polls are a snapshot in time. You have to look at all the variables - are they polling specific groups of voters or a cross-section or not? … We have internal polling showing my race a lot closer than the numbers out there.”
She “said she has been discussing her efforts to make the new health care reform law a more transparent process, job creation and getting the nation’s deficit and debt under control in coming years.”
Lincoln, on the financial system: “One of the big differences between Congressman Boozman and myself is that he backed TARP but not our Wall Street reform bill that became law this summer. He was all for bailing out Wall Street but not for cleaning things up.”
She “said” that “some” $21M “has flowed into the state” for negative advertising “against her re-election effort” during the primary, runoff and general election (Childress, Jonesboro Sun, 10/7).
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story mistated the name of The Times-Picayune‘s former food critic.
When the levees broke in 2005 and New Orleans began to fill with water, the staff of The Times-Picayune took flight to Houma, 90 minutes away. If they were going to put out a daily newspaper, they needed working equipment on higher ground. But someone had to cover the descent of my hometown from Bayou idyll to hellscape, so a dozen dutiful staffers — reporters, editors, photographers — hunkered down in a columnist’s uptown house. They chronicled the ensuing agony (the Convention Center) and ecstasy (rooftop rescues). They worked themselves raw. They won a Pulitzer Prize.
Next time a hurricane decimates New Orleans — it happens a few times per century — don’t expect these heroics. This week, Advance Publications, the media conglomerate that owns The Times-Picayune, cut the newsroom staff by 49 percent to 89 employees. When the overhaul is complete, the daily will be a Web-first publication that prints thrice weekly. In any town, this development would render hand-wringing. In New Orleans, the reaction is closer to horror. Practically every civic, culinary, religious, and artistic leader has begged Advance to reconsider.
That’s because New Orleans has a special love affair with itself. It’s not just garden-variety civic pride — the self-justifying way people convince themselves that their place is the best place. No, New Orleanians are obsessed with the anachronistic, easy-living, macabre, gluttonous, and jingoistic attributes that make the city what it is. And they’re largely right: The Crescent City is a place of glorious and conflicted weirdness. Impoverished black freedmen gave it music, their former masters gave it Mardi Gras and a love of rituals, and immigrants — Creoles, Cajuns, Italians, French — pitched in cuisine.
The Times-Picayune devoted itself to celebrating those attributes. It distinguished itself by the way it treated its subject — New Orleans — with exactly the right mix of curiosity, indignation, bemusement, reverence for tradition, hunger for progress, and love that the city deserves. As a local musician put it recently, The Times-Picayune was “the voice of the city.”
Yes, I’m writing in the past tense. This isn’t just a journalist’s elegy for his dying industry and the paper he grew up with — although, yes, it’s also that. Just to rehearse the main points for posterity: It is not possible in a greater metropolitan area of 1.2 million people to practice good accountability journalism with just 89 employees. Writers dashing off three Web stories every day will never be able to develop sources, get to know the subjects of their profiles, or spend enough time just observing to tell original stories. Especially when the story they’re trying to tell is as vital and complex as New Orleans.
More prosaically, but even more important, it takes manpower to comb through the jail logs and the City Council budget. Louisiana has a history of political corruption that exceeds even its reputation — a reputation brought to life as much by the enterprising work of investigative reporters as by local prosecutors. Meanwhile, the city faces a social-justice catastrophe: 28 percent of its residents live below the poverty line (more than double the national rate), and its nation-high murder rate is nearly 20 percent above the next-highest city on the list. The Times-Picayune says it will cover these stories, but the cutbacks belie the promise.
I’m not naive about the economics. After Hurricane Katrina, Times-Picayune circulation fell by nearly 30 percent, roughly mirroring the population decline. Although Advertising Age credited the publication with $70.4 million in print and Web ad revenue last year — sources inside the paper say it was profitable — national trends are obvious. (Advance is a family-owned company, so its finances are not public. It did not answer requests for comment.) Like all papers, The Times-Picayune must adapt.
But not this way! The print edition had 65 percent penetration in New Orleans, the fourth-best rate in the country. Now it will publish mostly online in a city where 36 percent of the people don’t have Internet access. Advance says the publication will focus more on sports and entertainment. (So why fire Brett Anderson, the beloved James Beard Award-winning food critic in a city that lives or dies with the fortunes of the food-service industry?) In other words, it will cater to white and wealthy readers in a town that owes its identity to the underclass, which stands to lose its voice.
It’s not hard to see Advance’s reasoning. Executives won’t sell the paper, because they can’t fetch a good price; and they don’t think it’s their responsibility to carry losses for the sake of the greater good. Maybe it makes sense to try something radical. Rip off the Band-Aid, right?
Wrong. A family-owned media company (no public shareholders or fiduciary obligations) can weigh other considerations, and in New Orleans there are many. Surely Advance knows that a newspaper is a public asset; it should have recognized that my hometown — beset by worse-than-normal urban pathologies, racing to reverse Katrina’s annihilation — needs one more than anywhere else. Ultimately, the company may be forced to move upmarket. But it could first try this experiment with its properties in, say, Newark, N.J., or Staten Island, both of which have less poverty and more Internet access.
And when the business model no longer works in New Orleans, as it eventually won’t, Advance should make the changes gently: Give readers time to make peace with them, cities time to generate more broadband penetration, and populations time to convert more fully to digital life. Cut publication but not staff, or not so dramatically, or not all at once — anything that prolongs the beautiful “voice of the city.” That, too, has value.
What We're Following See More »
A Russian government think tank run by Putin loyalists "developed a plan to swing the 2016 U.S. presidential election to Donald Trump and undermine voters’ faith in the American electoral system." Two confidential documents from the Putin-backed Institute for Strategic Studies, obtained by U.S. intelligence, provide "the framework and rationale for what U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded was an intensive effort by Russia to interfere with the Nov. 8 election."
"The FBI last year used a dossier of allegations of Russian ties to Donald Trump's campaign as part of the justification" to monitor Carter Page, who was then a defense adviser to the Trump campaign. "The dossier has also been cited by FBI Director James Comey in some of his briefings to members of Congress in recent weeks."
"The Air Force is set to deploy its high-tech, fifth-generation F-35A fighter jets to Europe this weekend as part of an effort to assure U.S. allies there who are worried about Russian aggression." The new, state-of-the-art fighters will train with European air units. "The Pentagon noted that the deployment had been long planned, meaning it was not a reaction to recent increasing tensions between the United States and Russia," although a statement noted the move is part of the "European Reassurance Initiative," which began three years ago when Russia annexed Crimea.