Politics: National Security

As Gates Departs, His Legacy Hangs in the Balance

Add to Briefcase
June 30, 2011, 2:07 a.m.

Sen. Blanche Lin­coln (D) “said get­ting wo­men and seni­ors to show up at the polls is key to her re-elec­tion hopes” 10/7.

Want More On This Race? Check out the Hot­line Dash­board for a com­pre­hens­ive run­down of this race, in­clud­ing stor­ies, polls, ads, FEC num­bers, and more!

Lin­coln: “(They) some­times are the cat­egory of people that in a mid-term elec­tion are less likely to come out in the num­bers that they’ve come out in a pres­id­en­tial year.” She “said she hopes for a large voter turnout — one that would in­clude more than just people vot­ing out of an­ger.”

Lin­coln: “Ex­pect­a­tions have been heightened in pres­id­en­tial years, and you get to a mid-term and people that are most likely to be angry or up­set are people who wanted something to hap­pen overnight. And it’s not go­ing to hap­pen overnight. So they’re more likely, per­haps, to come out. People that are prac­tic­al and real­ize that noth­ing hap­pens in­stantly or overnight might be com­pla­cent and say, ‘Well, it doesn’t really mat­ter.’”

Rep. John Booz­man (R-03) “said a large turnout ac­tu­ally would fa­vor him.” Booz­man: “As I go around all over the state … the people of Arkan­sas are very up­set with the ad­min­is­tra­tion. They’re up­set that in­stead of agree­ing with the views of Arkansans, she’s voted with the ad­min­is­tra­tion 95 per­cent of the time” (Ly­on, Arkan­sas News Bur­eau, 10/7).

Lin­coln, on trail­ing Booz­man in polling: “I’ve nev­er been a fan of polls, though some mem­bers of my staff are. The thing to re­mem­ber is that polls are a snap­shot in time. You have to look at all the vari­ables - are they polling spe­cif­ic groups of voters or a cross-sec­tion or not? … We have in­tern­al polling show­ing my race a lot closer than the num­bers out there.”

She “said she has been dis­cuss­ing her ef­forts to make the new health care re­form law a more trans­par­ent pro­cess, job cre­ation and get­ting the na­tion’s de­fi­cit and debt un­der con­trol in com­ing years.”

Lin­coln, on the fin­an­cial sys­tem: “One of the big dif­fer­ences between Con­gress­man Booz­man and my­self is that he backed TARP but not our Wall Street re­form bill that be­came law this sum­mer. He was all for bail­ing out Wall Street but not for clean­ing things up.”

She “said” that “some” $21M “has flowed in­to the state” for neg­at­ive ad­vert­ising “against her re-elec­tion ef­fort” dur­ing the primary, run­off and gen­er­al elec­tion (Chil­dress, Jones­boro Sun, 10/7).

COR­REC­TION: An earli­er ver­sion of this story mis­tated the name of The Times-Pi­cay­une‘s former food crit­ic.

When the levees broke in 2005 and New Or­leans began to fill with wa­ter, the staff of The Times-Pi­cay­une took flight to Houma, 90 minutes away. If they were go­ing to put out a daily news­pa­per, they needed work­ing equip­ment on high­er ground. But someone had to cov­er the des­cent of my ho­met­own from Bay­ou idyll to hell­s­cape, so a dozen du­ti­ful staffers — re­port­ers, ed­it­ors, pho­to­graph­ers — hunkered down in a colum­nist’s up­town house. They chron­icled the en­su­ing agony (the Con­ven­tion Cen­ter) and ec­stasy (rooftop res­cues). They worked them­selves raw. They won a Pulitzer Prize.

Next time a hur­ricane decim­ates New Or­leans — it hap­pens a few times per cen­tury — don’t ex­pect these hero­ics. This week, Ad­vance Pub­lic­a­tions, the me­dia con­glom­er­ate that owns The Times-Pi­cay­une, cut the news­room staff by 49 per­cent to 89 em­ploy­ees. When the over­haul is com­plete, the daily will be a Web-first pub­lic­a­tion that prints thrice weekly. In any town, this de­vel­op­ment would render hand-wringing. In New Or­leans, the re­ac­tion is closer to hor­ror. Prac­tic­ally every civic, culin­ary, re­li­gious, and artist­ic lead­er has begged Ad­vance to re­con­sider.

That’s be­cause New Or­leans has a spe­cial love af­fair with it­self. It’s not just garden-vari­ety civic pride — the self-jus­ti­fy­ing way people con­vince them­selves that their place is the best place. No, New Or­lean­i­ans are ob­sessed with the ana­chron­ist­ic, easy-liv­ing, macabre, glut­ton­ous, and jin­go­ist­ic at­trib­utes that make the city what it is. And they’re largely right: The Cres­cent City is a place of glor­i­ous and con­flic­ted weird­ness. Im­pov­er­ished black freed­men gave it mu­sic, their former mas­ters gave it Mardi Gras and a love of rituals, and im­mig­rants — Creoles, Cajuns, Itali­ans, French — pitched in cuisine.

The Times-Pi­cay­une de­voted it­self to cel­eb­rat­ing those at­trib­utes. It dis­tin­guished it­self by the way it treated its sub­ject — New Or­leans — with ex­actly the right mix of curi­os­ity,  in­dig­na­tion, be­muse­ment, rev­er­ence for tra­di­tion, hun­ger for pro­gress, and love that the city de­serves. As a loc­al mu­si­cian put it re­cently, The Times-Pi­cay­une was “the voice of the city.”

Yes, I’m writ­ing in the past tense. This isn’t just a journ­al­ist’s elegy for his dy­ing in­dustry and the pa­per he grew up with — al­though, yes, it’s also that. Just to re­hearse the main points for pos­ter­ity: It is not pos­sible in a great­er met­ro­pol­it­an area of 1.2 mil­lion people to prac­tice good ac­count­ab­il­ity journ­al­ism with just 89 em­ploy­ees. Writers dash­ing off three Web stor­ies every day will nev­er be able to de­vel­op sources, get to know the sub­jects of their pro­files, or spend enough time just ob­serving to tell ori­gin­al stor­ies. Es­pe­cially when the story they’re try­ing to tell is as vi­tal and com­plex as New Or­leans.

More pro­sa­ic­ally, but even more im­port­ant, it takes man­power to comb through the jail logs and the City Coun­cil budget. Louisi­ana has a his­tory of polit­ic­al cor­rup­tion that ex­ceeds even its repu­ta­tion — a repu­ta­tion brought to life as much by the en­ter­pris­ing work of in­vest­ig­at­ive re­port­ers as by loc­al pro­sec­utors. Mean­while, the city faces a so­cial-justice cata­strophe: 28 per­cent of its res­id­ents live be­low the poverty line (more than double the na­tion­al rate), and its na­tion-high murder rate is nearly 20 per­cent above the next-highest city on the list. The Times-Pi­cay­une says it will cov­er these stor­ies, but the cut­backs be­lie the prom­ise.

I’m not na­ive about the eco­nom­ics. After Hur­ricane Kat­rina, Times-Pi­cay­une cir­cu­la­tion fell by nearly 30 per­cent, roughly mir­ror­ing the pop­u­la­tion de­cline. Al­though Ad­vert­ising Age cred­ited the pub­lic­a­tion with $70.4 mil­lion in print and Web ad rev­en­ue last year — sources in­side the pa­per say it was prof­it­able — na­tion­al trends are ob­vi­ous. (Ad­vance is a fam­ily-owned com­pany, so its fin­ances are not pub­lic. It did not an­swer re­quests for com­ment.) Like all pa­pers, The Times-Pi­cay­une must ad­apt.

But not this way! The print edi­tion had 65 per­cent pen­et­ra­tion in New Or­leans, the fourth-best rate in the coun­try. Now it will pub­lish mostly on­line in a city where 36 per­cent of the people don’t have In­ter­net ac­cess. Ad­vance says the pub­lic­a­tion will fo­cus more on sports and en­ter­tain­ment. (So why fire Brett An­der­son, the be­loved James Beard Award-win­ning food crit­ic in a city that lives or dies with the for­tunes of the food-ser­vice in­dustry?) In oth­er words, it will cater to white and wealthy read­ers in a town that owes its iden­tity to the un­der­class, which stands to lose its voice.

It’s not hard to see Ad­vance’s reas­on­ing. Ex­ec­ut­ives won’t sell the pa­per, be­cause they can’t fetch a good price; and they don’t think it’s their re­spons­ib­il­ity to carry losses for the sake of the great­er good. Maybe it makes sense to try something rad­ic­al. Rip off the Band-Aid, right?

Wrong. A fam­ily-owned me­dia com­pany (no pub­lic share­hold­ers or fi­du­ciary ob­lig­a­tions) can weigh oth­er con­sid­er­a­tions, and in New Or­leans there are many. Surely Ad­vance knows that a news­pa­per is a pub­lic as­set; it should have re­cog­nized that my ho­met­own — be­set by worse-than-nor­mal urb­an patho­lo­gies, ra­cing to re­verse Kat­rina’s an­ni­hil­a­tion — needs one more than any­where else. Ul­ti­mately, the com­pany may be forced to move up­mar­ket. But it could first try this ex­per­i­ment with its prop­er­ties in, say, Ne­wark, N.J., or Staten Is­land, both of which have less poverty and more In­ter­net ac­cess.

And when the busi­ness mod­el no longer works in New Or­leans, as it even­tu­ally won’t, Ad­vance should make the changes gently: Give read­ers time to make peace with them, cit­ies time to gen­er­ate more broad­band pen­et­ra­tion, and pop­u­la­tions time to con­vert more fully to di­git­al life. Cut pub­lic­a­tion but not staff, or not so dra­mat­ic­ally, or not all at once — any­thing that pro­longs the beau­ti­ful “voice of the city.” That, too, has value.

What We're Following See More »
AS A CONTRIBUTOR
Chaffetz Joining Fox News
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, who will resign from Congress on Friday, will contribute to Fox News Channel and the Fox Business Channel starting July 1.

FOR BASTILLE DAY
Trump Will Visit France
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
TWO YEARS OF WORK FOR UKRAINE
Manafort Formally Registers as Foreign Agent
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A consulting firm led by Paul Manafort, who chaired Donald Trump’s presidential campaign for several months last year, retroactively filed forms Tuesday showing that his firm received $17.1 million over two years from a political party that dominated Ukraine before its leader fled to Russia in 2014."

Source:
HOUSE INTEL HEARING JULY 24
Roger Stone to Testify in Closed Session
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
UNTIL AFTER RECESS
Health Care Vote Delayed
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login