Yellen: ‘I Was Surprised’ By Slow Jobs Creation Pace

Matthew Dobias
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Matthew DoBias
Feb. 11, 2014, 7:26 a.m.

After dec­ades of swat­ting back fed­er­al ef­forts to change how care is provided and paid for in the United States, the Amer­ic­an Med­ic­al As­so­ci­ation found enough to its lik­ing to sup­port the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s long, dif­fi­cult cam­paign to en­act health re­form le­gis­la­tion.

But the good­will the AMA earned in Wash­ing­ton could come un­done by its sup­port of a Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate can­did­ate run­ning on a “re­peal and re­place” plat­form tar­get­ing the new law.

The AMA and its state coun­ter­part, the Pennsylvania Med­ic­al So­ci­ety, this week con­trib­uted $5,000 to former GOP Rep. Pat Toomey, whose prom­ise to scrap the health law has been a key plank of his cam­paign for the Sen­ate.

The con­tri­bu­tion, coupled with a highly pub­lic en­dorse­ment from the Pennsylvania phys­i­cian group, came as the White House, House Speak­er Pelosi and their al­lies plan to tout the key con­sumer pro­tec­tions in the new law that take ef­fect Sept. 23, ex­actly six months since its en­act­ment.

It also has raised eye­brows among some of the ad­voc­ates for health re­form who stood with the AMA dur­ing a pro­trac­ted le­gis­lat­ive pro­cess.

“From the stand­point of health re­form, this is a very strange thing, and I think it’s really coun­ter­pro­duct­ive to where the as­so­ci­ation has tried to move Amer­ica’s health­care sys­tem,” said Ron Pol­lack, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or and vice pres­id­ent of Fam­il­ies USA. “To put sup­port be­hind someone who is really work­ing to des­troy the key re­forms that are go­ing to help pa­tients, phys­i­cians and oth­er stake­hold­ers, is a bit astound­ing.”

While the AMA it­self does not en­dorse can­did­ates, fin­an­cial con­tri­bu­tions through its polit­ic­al arm, AM­PAC, are nev­er­the­less telling and fre­quently re­flect the polit­ic­al ten­or found at the grass­roots level.

Over the years, the AMA’s power­ful PAC has skewed con­ser­vat­ive—some­times over­whelm­ingly. But in re­cent cam­paign cycles, the as­so­ci­ation’s con­tri­bu­tions have moved more to the left, show­ing fa­vor to­ward Demo­crats, who for now hold the ma­jor­ity on both sides of the dome.

To be sure, it is not un­com­mon for in­terest groups to share the wealth among Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans dur­ing an elec­tion cycle, es­pe­cially ones that serve a di­verse mem­ber­ship. But the cam­paign con­tri­bu­tion to Toomey, whose pub­lic com­ments seem­ingly run counter to the vis­ible role the AMA took in its qual­i­fied sup­port of the health bill, stands out in part be­cause de­bate over the law is still so fresh.

In Ju­ly, Toomey and his elec­tion op­pon­ent, Rep. Joe Ses­tak, D-Pa., met sep­ar­ately with AM­PAC mem­bers for about an hour apiece. In ad­di­tion, each can­did­ate answered a ques­tion­naire to fur­ther gauge their stance on spe­cif­ic policy mat­ters.

Ac­cord­ing to sev­er­al sources, Toomey won out be­cause of his sup­port for med­ic­al li­ab­il­ity re­form. The AMA and oth­er med­ic­al groups have for years lob­bied for stronger pro­tec­tions against med­ic­al mal­prac­tice law­suits even though Demo­crats — long al­lied with the tri­al bar — have been wary of the ef­fort.

The na­tion­al as­so­ci­ation has re­cently taken heat from some of its mem­bers for fail­ing to se­cure tort re­form meas­ures in the broad­er health over­haul pack­age.

AMA Pres­id­ent Cecil Wilson said that his group would con­tin­ue to sup­port the Af­ford­able Care Act. He said the con­tri­bu­tion re­flects Toomey’s com­mit­ment to chan­ging the laws on in­jury lit­ig­a­tion and also to fix­ing the for­mula Medi­care uses to de­term­ine phys­i­cian re­im­burse­ment rates.

“This would be an easy job if every­one had a 100 per­cent re­cord on is­sues we sup­port,” Wilson said Thursday. “I think the im­port­ant thing to em­phas­ize is that it’s not as simple as one is­sue or the oth­er. It’s a mat­ter of where can­did­ates stand in gen­er­al.”

An­oth­er factor is one of simple polit­ics: While the man­tra of “re­peal and re­place” may play well on the cam­paign stump, few in Wash­ing­ton ac­tu­ally be­lieve it is polit­ic­ally achiev­able. The dif­fer­ence between cam­paign speeches and the ac­tu­al le­gis­lat­ive pro­cess could give some groups enough cov­er to make fin­an­cial con­tri­bu­tions that on the sur­face send polit­ic­ally mixed sig­nals.

While in the House, health pro­vider groups gen­er­ally viewed Toomey as an ally. As a law­maker in 2001, he co-sponsored le­gis­la­tion that gave hos­pit­als and phys­i­cians more re­course in fight­ing back against claims of fraud­u­lent or mis­dir­ec­ted billings.

As one health­care lob­by­ist put it, “He talks the lan­guage of docs.”

For his part, Ses­tak, his Demo­crat­ic rival who voted for the re­form bill, has gained the en­dorse­ment of the Amer­ic­an Nurses As­so­ci­ation. In a writ­ten state­ment, he railed against his op­pon­ent’s re­cord on health care.

“We re­spect the PAC’s de­cision,” Ses­tak’s of­fice said in a writ­ten state­ment. “Con­gress­man Toomey has fought for the in­sur­ance com­pan­ies. He wants to deny cov­er­age to chil­dren in need of care by op­pos­ing [the Chil­dren’s Health In­sur­ance Pro­gram], has worked against in­creas­ing ac­cess to pre­vent­at­ive care and pre­scrip­tion drugs for seni­ors; and has cast the de­cid­ing vote in fa­vor of cre­at­ing the Medi­care donut hole.”

What We're Following See More »
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.