The Scan - July 30, 2013

Two tea-party leaders ask GOP senators to sign a pledge by Sen. Mike Lee not to back a continuing resolution that helps fund Obamacare, and Interior Secretary Jewell blasts a House bill that would cut environmental and wildlife funding.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
July 29, 2013, 3:13 p.m.

Sen­ate Maj. Lead­er Harry Re­id and Sen. Joe Lieber­man (I-CT) “ap­pear will­ing to let their by­gones be by­gones,” as Lieber­man is host­ing “an eye-open­ing fun­draiser” for Re­id in Green­wich on 5/2. Re­id “asked Lieber­man to do a fun­draiser for him,” and “the ges­ture of good­will to­ward Re­id, who was quoted earli­er this year as say­ing that Lieber­man double-crossed him on health care re­form, has thrown” ob­serv­ers “for a loop.”

Want More On This Race? Check out the Hot­line Dash­board for a com­pre­hens­ive run­down of this race, in­clud­ing stor­ies, polls, ads, FEC num­bers, and more!

CT Dem Chair Nancy DiNardo “had to go back more than a year” to re­call the last time she saw Lieber­man at a party event. DiNardo: “If they’re friends, he could be help­ing a friend. I don’t know, though.” Lieber­man and Re­id did not re­spond to re­quests for com­ment on 4/27 (Vig­dor, Con­necti­c­ut Post, 4/27).

No Rush, We’ve Got All Elec­tion Sea­son

Re­id said 4/27 that he’s will­ing to bring up the cli­mate bill ahead of an im­mig­ra­tion bill. Re­id: “The en­ergy bill is ready. We will move that more quickly than a bill we don’t have. … I don’t have an im­mig­ra­tion bill.”

But a “still angry” Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham (R-SC) “said noth­ing has changed.” Gra­ham said in an in­ter­view, “If you cared about en­ergy and cli­mate and you really were com­mit­ted to that is­sue, you would not put im­mig­ra­tion on the table know­ing it will nev­er pass” (Daly, AP, 4/27).

No Am­nesty For Them, No Mercy For Re­id

‘06 Sec/State nom­in­ee/busi­ness­man/ex-UN­LV bas­ket­ball play­er Danny Tarkani­an’s (R) camp is up with a new 60-sec. ra­dio ad “sup­port­ing” AZ’s im­mig­ra­tion law. Start­ing 4/28, the ad “will run hourly on con­ser­vat­ive talk ra­dio.”

In the ad, Tarkani­an says, “Harry Re­id says we’re a na­tion of im­mig­rants — but more im­port­antly, the Con­sti­tu­tion states we’re a na­tion of laws. … Here’s my stand — we must de­fend the states’ 10th Amend­ment right to pro­tect their cit­izens. That’s something that Harry Re­id and his Wash­ing­ton friends just don’t un­der­stand.”

Tarkani­an con­tin­ues, “to really turn the tide, we must re­move the in­cent­ives — No more jobs and no more tax­pay­er-fun­ded edu­ca­tion, wel­fare or health care for il­leg­al im­mig­rants. And that’s the fun­da­ment­al dif­fer­ence between my plan and Sue Lowden’s. My plan says cut off tax­pay­er be­ne­fits for il­leg­als. Sue Lowden’s plan doesn’t.” And “if we don’t cut off the be­ne­fits, we’ll just keep pay­ing the price” (re­lease, 4/27).

Chick­en­ing Out

“It took around two weeks and a good deal of na­tion­al ri­dicule,” but ex-NV GOP Chair Sue Lowden “has fain­lly backed off her ap­par­ent ad­vocacy” for a “chick­ens for checkups” barter policy to bring down health care costs. In an in­ter­view with a loc­al ra­dio sta­tion 4/27, Lowden said she merely made “a cas­u­al state­ment talk­ing about the real­ity of what’s go­ing on” in NV, and said of Re­id’s camp, “They took it way out of con­text” (Sar­gent, “The Plum Line,” 4/27).

Lowden said on Alan Stock’s ra­dio show 4/27, “I know that bar­ter­ing takes place here in Nevada. It takes place throughout the coun­try and that Harry Re­id has been at­tack­ing me for say­ing something like that and the truth is it is hap­pen­ing and that’s how out of touch he is” (Ral­ston, Las Ve­gas Sun, 4/27).

Lowden spokes­per­son Crys­tal Feld­man elab­or­ates, “Sue’s com­ment on bar­ter­ing was nev­er a policy pro­pos­al,” but rather “an in­sight on how strug­gling fam­il­ies in Nevada are work­ing to pay for med­ic­al care dur­ing these tough times” (“The Plum Line,” 4/27).

Pro-Life, Pro-Lowden

NE Gov. Dave Heine­man (R) sent out a fun­drais­ing email for Lowden, writ­ing, “We have an op­por­tun­ity to help Sue Lowden be­come the only pro-life wo­man in the U.S. Sen­ate” (Hot­line email, 4/28).

Mean­while, Susan B. An­thony List “will be spend­ing” $1M to help Lowden de­feat Re­id, a spokes­per­son con­firmed (Ral­ston, “Ral­ston Flash,” 4/27).

Econ 101

Las Ve­gas Sun’s Cool­ic­an com­pares the can­did­ates’ plans for fix­ing Wall Street. Re­id “has tried to open de­bate” on Sen. Chris Dodd’s bill, “but so far failed to gain the 60 votes needed.”

‘06 NV-02 can­did­ate/ex-As­semb. Shar­ron Angle (R) said Wall Street doesn’t need re­form. Angle: “Get­ting back to tried and true sup­ply-side eco­nom­ics af­fec­tion­ately known as Re­aganom­ics will give small busi­ness and in­ter­na­tion­al con­fid­ence in our eco­nomy.” Angle did say “she would want to use un­spent stim­u­lus money to pay down the fed­er­al de­fi­cit.”

Wall Street Banker John Chachas (R) has a “de­tailed white pa­per” on the mat­ter, and ad­voc­ates for cre­at­ing a new “Risk Mon­it­or” to “keep watch on all sys­tem­ic fin­an­cial risk.” Chachas “said he would have voted” with GOP­ers to block de­bate on the pro­posed Wall Steet re­form bill, so sens. go “back to the table to ne­go­ti­ate for something that’s bet­ter for the coun­try.”

Lowden stood by her “lais­sez faire philo­sophy,” say­ing she fa­vors re­form, “but not the ma­jor re­form be­ing pro­posed by the Demo­crats. The No. 1 pri­or­ity should be to pro­tect the tax­pay­er.” Lowden also “op­poses cre­ation of a fund to help failed fin­an­cial firms meet their com­mit­ments.”

Tarkani­an also said he would have voted against the Dems’ bill, but he said reg­u­lat­ory re­form is “ab­so­lutely ne­ces­sary,” and sup­ports “tough­er rules on the trad­ing of de­riv­at­ives” (4/28).

Save The Date

Jon Ral­ston con­firms an “hour-long” Sen­ate de­bate will take place 5/18 on his “Face to Face” pro­gram. All re­ques­ted can­did­ates, in­clud­ing Lowden, have con­firmed (“Ral­ston Flash,” 4/27).

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
9 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
10 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

FULL CABINET IN PLACE
Acosta Confirmed As Labor Secretary
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Alexander Acosta was confirmed Thursday night as Labor secretary, officially filling out President Trump's cabinet on day 98 of his presidency. Nine Democrats joined every present Republican in voting to approve Acosta, with the final tally at 60-38. Trump's first choice for Labor secretary, Andrew Puzder, withdrew his nomination after taking criticism for hiring undocumented workers and for other matters in his personal life.

Source:
HAS WHITE HOUSE BACKING
Hurd to Make Push on Federal IT
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX) plans to introduce legislation today designed to help federal agencies update their aging technology—and this time, it has White House backing. Hurd worked alongside White House Office of American Innovation officials Reed Cordish and Chris Liddell in crafting and tweaking the legislation, and called their partnership an 'invaluable' part of the process."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login