Most Americans Haven’t Noticed Budget Cuts

National Journal
Kelsey Snell
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Kelsey Snell
Oct. 9, 2013, 6:29 p.m.

After sweep­ing Re­pub­lic­an vic­tor­ies that threaten to undo much of the Demo­crat­ic agenda, Pres­id­ent Obama could look to an of­ten-over­looked is­sue to build bridges and claim bi­par­tis­an­ship: pending trade agree­ments with South Korea, Panama, and Colom­bia.

Trade does not of­ten fall along tra­di­tion­al party lines, and many of the largest trade agree­ments have moved for­ward with bi­par­tis­an co­oper­a­tion, such as the North Amer­ic­an Free Trade Agree­ment, which was ne­go­ti­ated by Pres­id­ent George H.W. Bush and signed in­to law by Pres­id­ent Bill Clin­ton.

Com­pan­ies search­ing for new mar­kets and in­creased sales are hope­ful that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion can rep­lic­ate the suc­cess in deals ne­go­ti­ated by the George W. Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion with South Korea, Panama, and Colom­bia. Those deals stalled in the face of Demo­crat­ic res­ist­ance, though, over a vari­ety of is­sues, in­clud­ing vi­ol­ence against labor lead­ers in Colom­bia to auto­mobile and beef trade with South Korea.

In re­cent months U.S. Trade Rep­res­ent­at­ive Ron Kirk has been en­gaged in ne­go­ti­ations with Korean of­fi­cials. After the most re­cent round of ne­go­ti­ations wrapped last week, Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials stressed that trade with Korea was a vi­tal pri­or­ity.

“If you go back to the pres­id­ent’s State of the Uni­on, where he talked about doub­ling ex­ports, that in­cludes trade agree­ments and bi­lat­er­al in­vest­ment treat­ies,” John En­gler, pres­id­ent and CEO of the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Man­u­fac­tur­ers, said today. “I think there are a lot of things to work to­geth­er on, trade is one. That really is up to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.”

But En­gler is skep­tic­al of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s will­ing­ness to make trade a mar­quee is­sue. Trade deals with Colom­bia and Panama have been on the table since Obama took of­fice but he has not moved them for­ward. Man­u­fac­tur­ers are look­ing at the pres­id­ent’s pre­vi­ous ac­tion on trade and may lack con­fid­ence in Obama’s will­ing­ness to move for­ward now.

“We’ve done a lot of work in show­ing where we have free-trade agree­ments with the U.S., we have a pos­it­ive bal­ance of trade,” En­gler said. “If he’s ser­i­ous about doub­ling ex­ports, he has to get mov­ing.”

An­oth­er chal­lenge to the con­ven­tion­al wis­dom on trade bi­par­tis­an­ship is the staunch anti-Demo­crat­ic po­s­i­tion Re­pub­lic­ans have taken since Obama took of­fice.

“I don’t have much doubt that someone in the Re­pub­lic­an caucus is go­ing to say ‘we just spent the past two years op­pos­ing Obama on everything and it worked,’” said Wil­li­am Re­insch, pres­id­ent of the Na­tion­al For­eign Trade Coun­cil. “The Re­pub­lic­ans have to de­cide if they gain more by co­oper­at­ing than fight­ing. I don’t think they’re go­ing to im­me­di­ately leap to the con­clu­sion that they should agree.”

But Re­pub­lic­an trade lead­ers, in­clud­ing Reps. Kev­in Brady, R-Texas, and Dave Camp, R-Mich., have been very vo­cal about mak­ing trade a high pri­or­ity in the next Con­gress. Camp is likely to be the new chair­man of the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee, and Brady would be in line to chair that pan­el’s Trade Sub­com­mit­tee.

“Un­der a Re­pub­lic­an House lead­er­ship, if the pres­id­ent is ser­i­ous about mov­ing for­ward on trade, he will have a ser­i­ous part­ner on Cap­it­ol Hill,” Brady said at an Oc­to­ber 25 meet­ing in Wash­ing­ton.

The Novem­ber 11 dead­line for the Korean trade agree­ment set by Obama is fast ap­proach­ing and may give im­me­di­ate signs about how the ad­min­is­tra­tion will move for­ward.

What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×