The House’s Legal Team

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dec. 11, 2013, 3:05 p.m.

Gov. Jodi Rell‘s (R) “de­cision to bow out” and “not seek a second full term” will “de­mand pub­lic and me­dia at­ten­tion for a con­test that might oth­er­wise have been drowned out by the noise” of the SEN and nat’l races.

‘06 can­did­ate/Stam­ford May­or Dan Mal­loy (D): “The press was not likely to cov­er a Demo­crat­ic (primary) con­test if the gov­ernor was in it. So, for a guy like me, who rep­res­ents one tiny por­tion of this state in a me­dia mar­ket that has noth­ing to do with New Haven or Hart­ford, the chance for me to break through was im­peded. Now, it’s no longer im­peded. I’m go­ing to get cov­er­age.”

Sec/State Susan Bysiewicz (D) said Dems “are well-po­si­tioned to take back an of­fice they haven’t won since” ‘86.

Bysiewicz: “She had been a very pop­u­lar gov­ernor, and I think it is al­ways more dif­fi­cult to run when you have to go up against an in­cum­bent, par­tic­u­larly one who has been pop­u­lar. So there is a sense that the Demo­crats have an op­por­tun­ity, and I’m very pleased to be the front-run­ner among Demo­crats” (Mann, New Lon­don Day, 11/15).

Hart­ford Cour­ant‘s Bi­gelow writes, Dems “sud­denly have their best chance to win the top job” since ‘86. “The pos­sib­il­ity of win­ning has led to a lot of con­fu­sion among Demo­crats, so they’ve fallen back on a time-honored tra­di­tion: wait­ing for At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Richard Blu­menth­al (D) to do something.”

Blu­menth­al “pre­dict­ably ab­stained from the race” in Feb. “but now that Rell is gone there is sud­denly a sliv­er of hope that he might enter this race in­stead of wait­ing for that Sen­ate seat to fi­nally open up. That’s the prob­lem with Blu­menth­al; it’s been clear for a while that be­ing gov­ernor is only something he’d settle for.”

Bysiewicz “has def­in­ite gubernat­ori­al am­bi­tions. … Of the cur­rent can­did­ates, Bysiewicz is the only one to have won a statewide race, and she is known to be a tough primary cam­paign­er. I still have no idea what she thinks she would do as gov­ernor, though.”

Mal­loy “was a use­ful sort to put up against Rell next year, but now that Demo­crats ac­tu­ally have a shot at win­ning, he may find his sup­port drain­ing away to bet­ter-fun­ded, bet­ter-known can­did­ates.” Then there’s ‘06 SEN nom­in­ee/busi­ness­man Ned La­mont (D), “who has sup­port from the left wing of his party, name re­cog­ni­tion from his 2006 run and plenty of money to work with.”

“I sup­pose there are Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates, too, but they aren’t nearly as in­ter­est­ing or rel­ev­ant. … Re­pub­lic­ans are still heav­ily out­numbered in Con­necti­c­ut, after all, and without the power of in­cum­bency, the per­son­al pop­ular­ity of a Jodi Rell or a weak Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate to face off against, their chances look pretty grim” (11/15).

What We're Following See More »
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
23 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
17 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login