Rebutting the State of the Union

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Jan. 27, 2014, 1:37 p.m.

Speak­er Nancy Pelosi‘s “drive” for a “ro­bust” pub­lic op­tion “ran in­to tur­bu­lence” 10/22 when a whip count “showed she needs more votes to pass such a bill.” The sur­vey ordered by Pelosi “turned up” 46 Dems who “said they would vote against the so-called ‘ro­bust’ pub­lic op­tion, ac­cord­ing to a Dem law­maker. A House lead­er­ship source said Dem de­cisions 10/22 were “in flux” (Sor­aghan, The Hill, 10/22).

Pelosi’s pub­lic op­tion pre­dic­a­ment, “coupled with a sig­ni­fic­ant turn of events” 10/22 dur­ing a private WH meet­ing, “points to an in­creas­ingly likely com­prom­ise” for a “trig­ger” op­tion. Ad­min. of­fi­cials have been say­ing for weeks now “that this the most likely com­prom­ise be­cause it can prob­ably sat­is­fy lib­er­als.”

“There has been a flurry of ru­mors” that a “ro­bust” pub­lic op­tion “re­mains vi­able” (Al­len, Politico, 10/23). Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Mont­gomery/Mur­ray re­port this a.m., for ex­ample, that Pelosi and top lieu­ten­ants said 10/22 that “they are close to cor­ralling the 218 votes they need” to pass “a ver­sion of the pub­lic op­tion prized by lib­er­als” (10/23).

But top House Dems “privately con­cede that is wish­ful think­ing that ig­nores the power” of mod­er­ate Dems in this de­bate. A top of­fi­cial: “Votes aren’t there. The pro­gress­ives are al­ways more op­tim­ist­ic than real­ity” (Politico, 10/23). Three dozen mod­er­ate House Dems “are warn­ing” Pelosi and House Maj. Lead­er Steny Hoy­er that they must show that their health-care bill “will cut long-term costs or they will vote it down” (Den­nis/Newmy­er, Roll Call, 10/22).

Pelosi also said the House bill would re­peal the anti-trust ex­emp­tion for health in­sur­ance com­pan­ies (Her­szen­horn, “Pre­crip­tions,” New York Times, 10/23).

Turn On, Tune In, Opt Out

Pres. Obama told Dem lead­ers 10/22 p.m. at the WH “that his pref­er­ence is for the trig­ger” plan be­ing pushed by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME). It’s a sign Obama “is in­ter­ested in main­tain­ing a sense of bi­par­tis­an­ship” on health care. At the 10/22 meet­ing, Obama “did not sign on to a plan be­ing floated” by Sen­ate Maj. Lead­er Harry Re­id for a plan that would let states “opt out” of the pub­lic op­tion (Politico, 10/23). Re­id was joined at the WH by Dem Sens. Chuck Schu­mer (NY), Patty Mur­ray (WA) and Dick Durbin (IL) (Politico, 10/22).

Schu­mer, on the “opt out” plan: “Lib­er­als live with it. Mod­er­ates live with it. It’s in the middle” But Sen. Tom Carp­er (D-DE) said he is work­ing on fur­ther modi­fy­ing the “opt out” plan “to in­clude a trig­ger clause and a non-profit, pro­vi­sions aimed at Snowe (Ed­ney, Con­gress­Daily AM, 10/23).

Re­id’s in­ten­tions to in­clude a pub­lic op­tion in the Sen­ate bill “re­flect a cal­cu­lated gamble” that all mem­bers of his party would vote for the plan “if it in­cluded some mech­an­ism for states to opt out.”

As word spread of Re­id’s plan, “cent­rist” sens from both parties “said they had come to­geth­er … to res­ist the cre­ation of a uni­form na­tion­wide” pub­lic op­tion. Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA): “I am press­ing to get a gov­ern­ment-run, tax­pay­er-sup­por­ted pub­lic op­tion out of the bill. I want to rely on a re­formed private mar­ket­place, not the cur­rent waste­ful, ab­us­ive, un­af­ford­able private mar­ket” (Pear/Her­szen­horn, “Pre­scrip­tions,” New York Times, 10/22).

TPM’s Beut­ler asks, “where did all of this mo­mentum for the pub­lic op­tion come from?” Ap­par­ently, “it came from” a 10/21 “closed-door” WH meet­ing, “with the push com­ing from” Dem cong. lead­ers. Source: “It was in­dic­ated that based on some sur­vey­ing that had been done of the mod­er­ates, that it doesn’t so far seem like they would jump out of their skin as long as they have an op­por­tun­ity to vote against it” (10/22).

Key sens “cau­tioned” 10/22 that the dis­cus­sions are evolving, the fi­nal pro­pos­al has yet to be de­term­ined and any de­term­in­a­tion of a vote count is pre­ma­ture” (Brown, Politico, 10/22). Still, “hav­ing both cham­bers put a pub­lic plan on their floors would be a sig­ni­fic­ant boost” to Obama (Haberkorn/Row­land, Wash­ing­ton Times, 10/23).

WH sr. ad­viser Valer­ie Jar­rett ap­peared on “Morn­ing Joe” this a.m.

Jar­rett, on wheth­er it’s fair to say Obama wants a re­form bill that has a trig­ger, and not ne­ces­sar­ily a pub­lic op­tion: “No, I think the pres­id­ent has al­ways said he is com­mit­ted to the pub­lic op­tion. Why? Be­cause he thinks it will cre­ate com­pet­i­tion and there­fore, bring down costs. He’s al­ways said he’s open to new ideas. But at this late stage in the game, he still thinks it’s the best op­tion. … He is ab­so­lutely com­mit­ted to de­liv­er­ing on health care form this year.”

MS­N­BC’s Scar­bor­ough: “So by the White House’s count, do you be­lieve have enough to get the pub­lic op­tion in the House and the Sen­ate?”

Jar­rett: “I think it’s too soon to tell. All I know is we’re go­ing to keep push­ing un­til the very last mo­ment. I think it’s im­port­ant to un­der­stand why. We want to bring down the costs. … What we want to do on be­half of the Amer­ic­an people and our tax­pay­ers is to to bring down those costs so that it is more af­ford­able” (MS­N­BC, 10/23).

Snowe: Go Slow

Snowe is one of sev­er­al cent­rist sens who are em­phas­iz­ing the “ab­so­lute ne­ces­sity of tak­ing it slow” on health-care re­form. Snowe: “We must not rush this train out of the sta­tion” (New York Times, 10/22). More Snowe, on talks she’s hav­ing with cent­rists: “We’ve had con­ver­sa­tions about tak­ing it slow.”

“As a res­ult” of the go-slow warn­ings, health-care le­gis­la­tion “will not reach the Sen­ate floor soon­er than the first week” in Nov. and “has no chance of be­ing ap­proved” by Thanks­giv­ing. Dems and GOP­ers “ex­pect” the floor de­bate to take at least a month, put­ting ne­go­ti­ations between” the House and Sen­ate “squarely in Decem­ber.”

Lib­er­als are “grow­ing in­creas­ingly im­pa­tient and ir­rit­ated with the slow pace, but a stun­ning de­feat of a doc­tors’ pay­ment bill” 10/21 “has un­der­scored the need for Re­id to move cau­tiously” (Bolton, The Hill, 10/22).

In an in­ter­view on Bloomberg TV, Snowe also “said she won’t sup­port the im­me­di­ate cre­ation of any” pub­lic op­tion and she “raised the pos­sib­il­ity that le­gis­la­tion over­haul­ing the health sys­tem won’t be com­pleted this year.” Snowe: “A pub­lic op­tion at the fore­front really does put the gov­ern­ment in a dis­pro­por­tion­ate po­s­i­tion with re­spect to the in­dustry.” More: “Christ­mas might be too soon. We should give it the time it de­serves” (10/22).

An­oth­er cent­rist, Sen. Ben Nel­son(D-NE), re­it­er­ated his claim that Dems should listen to mod­er­ates’ con­cerns. Nel­son: “I’ve not said my clo­ture vote is a giv­en, and I’d be very con­cerned about a clo­ture vote if I be­lieve the un­der­ly­ing bill is something I can’t live with” (Ed­ney, Con­gress­Daily PM, 10/22).

With Or Without Her

Ex-VT Gov./ex-DNC chair Howard Dean ap­peared on the “Rachel Mad­dow Show” 10/22 p.m.

MS­N­BC’s Mad­dow: “Sen. Ar­len Specter on the ‘Ed Show’ … today said he thinks Demo­crats have 60 votes to in­voke clo­ture without Sen. Snowe. If that’s true, is real re­form a done deal?”

Dean: “Noth­ing is ever a done deal un­til the fi­nal vote, but I think that’s true. There’s a long his­tory in le­gis­lat­ive bod­ies, in the Sen­ate and the House in Wash­ing­ton or one of them that you can vote any way you want, of course, on a sub­stant­ive is­sue. But you’ve got to vote with the lead­er of your party on a pro­ced­ur­al is­sue. That is, if you are in a caucus and you owe your po­s­i­tion of your chair­man­ship or your rank­ing mem­ber or whatever it is, to the lead­er and to the party, then you owe the party, not a vote on an is­sue.”

More Dean: “That’s your own busi­ness and your con­stitu­ents’ busi­ness, but you owe the party and the lead­er­ship the abil­ity to run the cham­ber. And that is why I think that there will be 60 votes. And I think Sen. Re­id will do the best he can to get it. And I think he’ll get them” (MS­N­BC, 10/22).

Sen. Ar­len Specter (D-PA), on Snowe say­ing she’s not go­ing to “sup­port im­me­di­ate cre­ation” of a gov’t-run in­sur­ance pro­gram: “We have 60 votes without Sen­at­or Snowe, so we can still in­voke clo­ture and move to a vote on the pub­lic op­tion. We have flex­ib­il­ity. … With 50 votes, plus the vice pres­id­ent — and my vote is go­ing to be for the pub­lic op­tion, a ro­bust pub­lic op­tion — we can get it passed, even without Sen­at­or Snowe. I hope we have her, but we may be able to do it without her” (“Ed Show,” MS­N­BC, 10/22)

Steny As He Goes

Hoy­er ap­peared on the “Ed Show” 10/22 p.m.

Hoy­er, on wheth­er the House has 218 votes in sup­port of the bill: “I think we have 218 votes. We’re still work­ing, the bill is not com­pletely done … but we’re work­ing, we’re work­ing hard. And as we have in the past, we think we’re go­ing to pass this bill.”

Hoy­er, on the ef­fect a House bill has on the Sen­ate: “I cer­tainly think that when the House passes a bill … it will give us mo­mentum. It will send a sig­nal to the Sen­ate that we be­lieve the over­whelm­ing ma­jor­ity of the Amer­ic­an pub­lic want health re­form. We think a sig­ni­fic­ant ma­jor­ity want to sup­port this bill. And I think it will send a mes­sage to the Sen­ate for move­ment. I think it will help Sen­at­or Re­id and the pro­ponents of the bill in the Sen­ate” (MS­N­BC, 10/22).

Hey, I’m Just Here To Vis­it Some Old Friends

Obama travels today to MA, “one of only two states to im­ple­ment a uni­ver­sal health-care pro­gram sim­il­ar to his am­bi­tions for the en­tire coun­try.” But “he does not plan to use the trip to make his case for far-reach­ing re­form; he will tout clean en­ergy and raise money for” Gov. Dev­al Patrick (D). Crit­ics “say his re­luct­ance to spot­light” the MA mod­el “is real-world evid­ence that his vis­ion would not work” on a nat’l scale. Obama’s al­lies — and even one prom­in­ent ad­versary — “see a more nu­anced pic­ture that of­fers guide­posts for fed­er­al law­makers as they fi­nal­ize de­cisions” on a bill (Con­nolly, Wash­ing­ton Post, 10/23).

For his part, Patrick said 10/22 p.m. that he wishes MA had a pub­lic op­tion (AP, 10/22).

Only Time Will Tell

One mes­sage Obama “has pressed upon” cong. Dems “is that the top pri­or­ity in health care re­form is es­tab­lish­ing the prin­ciple that all Amer­ic­ans are en­titled to de­cent cov­er­age.” His “point is that ad­voc­ates shouldn’t ob­sess about shoe­horn­ing every idea they fa­vor in­to the le­gis­la­tion; once the ba­sic frame­work is built, Con­gress will ad­just the de­tails over time, as it has with all oth­er ma­jor so­cial-policy in­nov­a­tions.”

“That’s an ac­cur­ate read­ing of Amer­ic­an his­tory. But it’s also true that it’s easi­er to ren­ov­ate a house that has a sturdy found­a­tion. And Obama now faces the risk that in the fi­nal man­euv­er­ing, his al­lies will chisel two dan­ger­ous cracks in­to the plan’s base.”

One threat “re­volves around” an amend­ment ad­op­ted by the Sen­ate Fin­ance Cmte from Schu­mer and Snowe “that eroded the bill’s corner­stone pro­vi­sion: the man­date that in­di­vidu­als buy health in­sur­ance, with help from gov­ern­ment sub­sidies if ne­ces­sary.” The second po­ten­tial crack in the bill’s found­a­tion “would threaten Obama’s abil­ity to fund the sub­sidies ne­ces­sary for an ef­fect­ive man­date” (Brown­stein, Na­tion­al Journ­al, 10/24 is­sue).

What We're Following See More »
Niger Attack Possible Terrorist Set-Up
3 hours ago

"An emerging theory among U.S. military investigators is that the Army Special Forces soldiers ambushed in Niger were set up by terrorists, who were tipped off in advance about a meeting in a village sympathetic to local ISIS affiliates...The group of American Green Berets and support soldiers had requested a meeting with elders of a village that was seen as supportive of the Islamic State, and they attended the meeting at around 11 a.m. local time Oct. 4...Such meetings are a routine part of the Green Beret mission, but it wasn't clear whether this meeting was part of the unit's plan."

Bergdahl’s Sentencing Delayed Until Wednesday
3 hours ago

"The long-awaited sentencing of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl was delayed Monday after a legal battle erupted over the word 'but' in President Donald Trump's most recent remarks about the case. Bergdahl's defense team argued that their client could not get a fair shake from the court because Trump, during a Rose Garden appearance on Oct. 16, at first said he couldn't talk about the case and then added: 'But I think people have heard my comments in the past.'" Trump has called him a traitor and suggested he should be executed.

Pentagon to Scrub Kaspersky from Its Systems
5 hours ago
Trump Admin to Kill Boeing Sales to Iran
7 hours ago

"The Trump administration is coming under increased pressure from Congress to kill a landmark deal between Boeing and an Iranian airline known for engaging in terrorism over concerns the Western airline company would enable Tehran's transfer of militant fighters across the region, according to multiple sources, who told the Washington Free Beacon the administration is likely to nix the multi-billion dollar deal. The Obama administration's nuclear agreement with Iran paved the way for U.S. aerospace corporation Boeing to ink a deal with Iran's state-controlled airline, Iran Air, which was recently caught using its commercial planes to ferry Iranian militants to regional hotspots."

Mueller Investigating Tony Podesta and His Firm
12 hours ago

"Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, three sources with knowledge of the matter told NBC News. The probe of Podesta and his Democratic-leaning lobbying firm grew out of Mueller's inquiry into the finances of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.