Divided GOP Ponders Way Forward on Criminal Justice Reform

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wants to slow down until more members learn about the bipartisan legislation.

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Jan. 20, 2016, 8 p.m.

Re­pub­lic­an di­vi­sions over crim­in­al-justice re­form could im­per­il chances for a bi­par­tis­an deal to over­haul sen­ten­cing and pris­on-re­lease policies.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell on Wed­nes­day signaled a go-slow ap­proach on le­gis­la­tion to ease pris­on sen­tences for non­vi­ol­ent drug of­fenses, even as the in­tensi­fy­ing White House race could make com­prom­ise tough­er as the elec­tion draws closer.

“The mem­bers of the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee have been deeply in­volved in that is­sue, [but] the rest of the con­fer­ence is not,” Mc­Con­nell told re­port­ers in the Cap­it­ol. He has not made any com­mit­ment to bring le­gis­la­tion be­fore the full Sen­ate.

“We are go­ing to be work­ing through the pro­cess of bring­ing every­body in the con­fer­ence up to speed on this very im­port­ant is­sue, and we are go­ing to do that be­fore any de­cision is made about floor time,” Mc­Con­nell said.

Dis­cus­sion of the bill dur­ing the Sen­ate GOP lunch Wed­nes­day high­lighted dis­agree­ments over the meas­ure, ac­cord­ing to one sen­at­or who asked not to be named be­cause he was dis­cuss­ing a closed-door meet­ing.

Sen. John Cornyn, the ma­jor­ity whip who is a key back­er of the bill, ac­know­ledged hurdles fa­cing the bill that passed the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee last fall.

“I think [Mc­Con­nell] is bow­ing to real­ity, and the real­ity is that it was a 15-5 vote in the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee. Five of our [GOP] mem­bers had re­ser­va­tions. We have been try­ing to work with them to try and ad­dress changes in the le­gis­la­tion that might get them on the bill,” Cornyn said.

“We have got some work to do to try to build that con­sensus. We are, I would say, more at the be­gin­ning of the pro­cess than the end of the pro­cess. But I have asked all of my col­leagues to work with us to try and find out where that con­sensus lies,” Cornyn said Wed­nes­day.

There’s likely more than enough sup­port in the full Sen­ate to ap­prove the bill. But the bill is non­ethe­less un­likely to come up un­less there’s broad sup­port among Re­pub­lic­ans. “You would want to have a big vote, and cer­tainly on our side we would want to have our guys by and large in fa­vor of where it was headed,” Sen. John Thune, a mem­ber of the GOP’s lead­er­ship team, told Na­tion­al Journ­al on Wed­nes­day.

The meas­ure also en­ables re­duced pris­on terms for people who take part in pro­grams to cut their risk of re­cidiv­ism, and over­hauls sen­ten­cing policy for gun-re­lated of­fenses in ways that ex­pand some pen­al­ties while trim­ming oth­ers.

The bill faces mul­tiple ob­jec­tions. Some Re­pub­lic­ans say it’s es­sen­tially soft on crime.

“I don’t think people have stud­ied it closely, and I think [when] they do, they are go­ing to be far more troubled than they think,” Sen. Jeff Ses­sions, who voted against the bill in the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee, told re­port­ers in the Cap­it­ol on Wed­nes­day.

“We are at a point where we are see­ing smal­ler fed­er­al and state pris­on pop­u­la­tions and you are go­ing to see an in­crease in crime, an in­crease in vi­ol­ent crime; it is already be­gin­ning to oc­cur. We are also soften­ing our ap­proach to drugs, and you are go­ing to see more deaths from heroin, and more crime re­lated to drug ab­use,” Ses­sions said.

He and fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans Ted Cruz—who is a lead­ing GOP White House con­tender—Or­rin Hatch, Dav­id Per­due, and Dav­id Vit­ter op­posed the bill in com­mit­tee, while Cornyn and the oth­er com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans joined Demo­crats in sup­port.

An­oth­er stum­bling block is a GOP-led push to add pro­vi­sions that would sub­stan­tially ex­pand the num­ber of crimes for which pro­sec­utors must show that de­fend­ants knew that their con­duct was il­leg­al.

The push led by Hatch to ex­pand “mens rea” (or “guilty mind”) re­quire­ments was the sub­ject of a hear­ing Wed­nes­day in the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee that saw sup­port­ers of the bill ur­ging their GOP col­leagues not to let the mens rea is­sue take down the whole bill.

“In the com­ing weeks, we have an his­tor­ic op­por­tun­ity to pass le­gis­la­tion that will cor­rect some of the worst in­justices in our crim­in­al-justice sys­tem,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy, the top Demo­crat on the pan­el. “All of this pro­gress is now at risk be­cause some are de­mand­ing sweep­ing changes that would make it harder to hold cor­por­a­tions ac­count­able when they sell food that sick­ens con­sumers, en­dangers work­ers, or pois­ons our wa­ter sup­ply.”

Cornyn, while sup­port­ing changes to mens rea, said Wed­nes­day that he’s con­cerned about im­per­il­ing the bill that’s de­signed to ad­dress sen­ten­cing and pris­on re­form.

“I worry that if we be­gin to add ad­di­tion­al things to that le­gis­la­tion, it is go­ing to weigh it down to the point where we will not be able to pass any­thing this year,” Cornyn said at the hear­ing, cit­ing a “small win­dow of op­por­tun­ity.”

But it’s a sticky prob­lem be­cause while the Justice De­part­ment op­poses adding mens rea to the bill and key Demo­crats do as well, House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte has said that it’s a vi­tal part of the par­al­lel crim­in­al-justice re­form ef­fort in his cham­ber.

“I do be­lieve the House is go­ing to pass le­gis­la­tion that does in­clude some mens rea re­quire­ment,” Cornyn said, “and wheth­er or not the Sen­ate ver­sion has it in there, we are go­ing to have to deal with this is­sue at some point along the way any­way.”

What We're Following See More »
Mueller Made 14 Criminal Referrals
8 hours ago
The Report Is Here
15 hours ago
Nadler Asks Mueller to Testify By May 23
16 hours ago
Barr OK With Mueller Testifying
16 hours ago
Report Finds 10 Episodes of Potential Obstruction
16 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.