Quantifying Progress in Reducing WMD Threats Getting Tougher: Report

Missile-launch tubes removed from a ballistic missile submarine in January 2010 are eliminated with equipment and services provided by the U.S. Defense Department's Cooperative Threat Reduction program. A new congressional report warns it is growing more difficult to quantify progress in reducing the global threat posed by weapons of mass destruction.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
Rachel Oswald
June 26, 2014, 6:54 a.m.

A re­cent con­gres­sion­al re­port sees grow­ing dif­fi­culty ahead in quan­ti­fy­ing pro­gress in U.S. ef­forts to se­cure and elim­in­ate weapons of mass de­struc­tion.

Chan­ging cir­cum­stances — in­clud­ing some not­able suc­cesses — are the cul­prit, ac­cord­ing to a June 13 re­port by the Con­gres­sion­al Re­search Ser­vice pos­ted on­line by the Fed­er­a­tion of Amer­ic­an Sci­ent­ists.

After more than 20 years, many U.S. pro­grams au­thor­ized by the Nunn-Lugar Act to dis­pose of So­viet-era nuc­le­ar and chem­ic­al arms are al­most done with their work. Thou­sands of nuc­le­ar war­heads and hun­dreds of long-range bal­list­ic mis­siles have been des­troyed as part of the Co­oper­at­ive Threat Re­duc­tion ini­ti­at­ive.

But as dis­arm­a­ment work in the former So­viet Uni­on winds down, the United States in­creas­ingly is fo­cused on the less quan­ti­fi­able goal of re­du­cing the po­ten­tial for non­state act­ors op­er­at­ing in the Middle East and Africa to ac­quire un­con­ven­tion­al arms.

“As the United States has ex­pan­ded its threat re­duc­tion as­sist­ance to na­tions out­side the former So­viet states, and as the pro­grams have em­phas­ized co­oper­at­ive en­gage­ment, ca­pa­city-build­ing, and best prac­tices in­stead of weapons dis­man­tle­ment and fa­cil­ity se­cur­ity, the prob­lem of meas­ur­ing pro­gress has grown more com­plic­ated,” con­cludes the CRS re­port.

Re­cent ex­amples of this new ca­pa­city-build­ing work in­clude a U.S.-fin­anced pro­ject to build a high-se­cur­ity bio­lo­gic­al labor­at­ory in Kaza­kh­stan, the de­ploy­ment of ra­di­ation scan­ners at Azerbaijan’s Baku Air­port, and the train­ing of Kenyan and Ugandan armed forces to re­spond to a WMD ter­ror­ist at­tack.

“While par­ti­cipants in the [CTR] pro­gram may be con­fid­ent in their abil­ity to share know­ledge and build co­oper­at­ive re­la­tion­ships, they may be less con­fid­ent in their abil­ity to meas­ure the re­la­tion­ship between fund­ing and pro­gress in co­oper­a­tion,” the re­port by Con­gress’ in­tern­al think tank notes.

“However, most of the threat re­duc­tion as­sist­ance cur­rently un­der way is more dif­fi­cult to quanti­fy,” the con­gres­sion­al ana­lysts ex­plained. “In many cases, pro­gress is evid­ent in ac­cess to de­cision makers and op­er­at­ors, and suc­cess is re­flec­ted in the growth of re­la­tion­ships.”

The re­port said that met­rics could po­ten­tially be de­veloped for threat-re­duc­tion ef­forts, based in part on sur­vey tools used in re­lated pro­jects that at­tempt to gauge pro­gress in such fields as “a coun­try’s li­cens­ing, en­force­ment, in­dustry out­reach, and non­pro­lif­er­a­tion re­gime ad­her­ence.”

Mean­while, U.S. Co­oper­at­ive Threat Re­duc­tion ini­ti­at­ives have played high-pro­file roles in re­cent in­ter­na­tion­al non­pro­lif­er­a­tion wins. CTR fund­ing was used to re­pair a chem­ic­als de­struc­tion fa­cil­ity in Libya that was dis­abled by the 2011 re­volu­tion, pav­ing the way for the North Afric­an coun­try last year to fi­nally des­troy the last of its chem­ic­al arms. Sim­il­arly, the U.S. MV Cape Ray, which is set to shortly be­gin des­troy­ing Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al war­fare ma­ter­i­als, was also equipped us­ing CTR funds.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
3 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login