Senators are working on a bill that could extend the life of a controversial chemical security program, but details still remain under wraps.
The Senate Homeland Security Committee was to mark up what it is calling the “Protecting American Chemical Facilities from Attack Act of 2014” on June 25, but consideration of the measure was ultimately deleted, without explanation, from the agenda of a committee business meeting that day.
A spokeswoman for the panel, which is chaired by Senator Tom Carper (D-Del.), declined to provide details regarding the legislation and how soon it might be unveiled.
Carper’s committee held a hearing on the Homeland Security Department’s Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards on May 14. During the hearing, Carper said a bill approved in April by the House Homeland Security Committee could serve “as a model for [his panel’s] work on this issue between now and the end of the year.”
The House legislation is backed by DHS officials, largely because it would provide multiyear authorization for a program that thus far has been renewed annually through the congressional appropriations process. DHS officials have said uncertainty stemming from year-to-year renewals has made it more difficult to regulate chemical facilities.
The House bill does not include provisions that would give the department the authority to require specific security upgrades at facilities. So-called “inherently safer technology” requirements are favored by labor union officials, environmentalists and some Democrats, but are opposed by Republicans and industry officials.
The House legislation would also continue an exemption for water treatment facilities that has been criticized by some Democrats and activist groups. An interagency report released by the Obama administration last month urged Congress to end the exemption.
Carper, during the May 14 hearing, did not indicate whether a Senate bill might include additional provisions meant to address any of these controversies, but he did acknowledge some of the CFATS program’s perceived shortcomings.
Last year’s fatal explosion at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas “showed that, in some cases, the Department likely isn’t aware of some facilities that should be submitting information to the program but are not,” Carper said.
The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office “and other experts have also expressed concern that the department’s method for assessing risk for a chemical facility is incomplete,” Carper noted.
What We're Following See More »
"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."