Major U.S. Nuclear-Arms Plants to Get New Manager on Tuesday

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
June 30, 2014, 10 a.m.

Man­age­ment of two of the United States’ key nuc­le­ar weapon plants is set to switch on Tues­day, the Am­arillo Globe-News re­ports.

The Bechtel-led Con­sol­id­ated Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity group is slated to take over man­age­ment of the Y-12 Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Com­plex in Ten­ness­ee and the Pan­tex Plant in Texas from Nuc­le­ar Pro­duc­tion Part­ners, a con­sor­ti­um led by Bab­cock & Wil­cox.

The sched­uled changeover fol­lows three un­suc­cess­ful protests lodged by Nuc­le­ar Pro­duc­tion Part­ners against the Janu­ary 2013 de­cision by the Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion to award a $22 bil­lion con­tract to Con­sol­id­ated Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity to op­er­ate the two nuc­le­ar-arms com­plexes.

The Pan­tex fa­cil­ity as­sembles and dis­as­sembles nuc­le­ar war­heads, and the Y-12 com­plex pro­duces weapons-grade urani­um.

The de­cision to hand man­age­ment of the weapons plants over to Con­sol­id­ated came after the con­sor­ti­um said it could save the gov­ern­ment more than $3 bil­lion in con­tract costs by con­sol­id­at­ing man­age­ment of the Y-12 and Pan­tex fa­cil­it­ies.

“Over the four-month trans­ition, we com­pleted thou­sands of ac­tion items, hired more than 7,800 em­ploy­ees across two sites, in­spec­ted nearly 400 fa­cil­it­ies, re­viewed and ap­proved over 5,000 pro­ced­ures, and set our plans for man­aging and op­er­at­ing the con­sol­id­ated en­ter­prise from Day 1,”  Con­sol­id­ated spokes­man Jason Bo­hne said. “And we did it all on sched­ule and un­der budget. We are ready to start on Ju­ly 1, and we look for­ward to join­ing the teams at Pan­tex and Y-12.”

Un­der the man­age­ment of Nuc­le­ar Pro­duc­tion Part­ners, Y-12 ex­per­i­enced one of its most em­bar­rass­ing se­cur­ity in­cid­ents in re­cent memory when a trio of eld­erly peace act­iv­ists in 2012 were able to suc­cess­fully gain ac­cess to a sup­posedly highly se­cure area of the fa­cil­ity in or­der to stage an anti-nuc­le­ar protest.

What We're Following See More »
UNLIKELY TO GET A VOTE, LIKELY TO ANGER GOP SENATORS
Obama Nominates Ambassador to Cuba
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
GOP REFUSED VOTE ON FCC COMMISIONER
Reid Blocks Tech Bill Over “Broken Promise”
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.

Source:
FLINT FUNDING STILL AT ISSUE
Spending Bill Fails to Clear 60-Vote Hurdle
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
SURPASSED 80 MILLION VIEWERS
Monday’s Debate Was Most Watched Ever
6 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE
‘WASN’T PREPARED’
Hill Republicans Don’t Like What They See in Debate
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"It was obvious he wasn't prepared." “He only mentioned her email scandal once." "I think he took things a little too personal and missed a lot of opportunities to make very good debate points." That's just a smattering of the reactions of some elected Republicans to Donald Trump's debate performance.

Source:
×