Congress Thinks This Statue Is a Threat to National Security

The House passed legislation this week to prevent a statue from being erected in front of a federal courthouse in Alabama due to security concerns.

The 'Red Mountain' sculpture by Dmitri Hadzi stood in front of the Hugo Black Courthouse in Birmingham, Ala., before it was removed for construction. The General Services Administration is in a battle with Congress to re-install it.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Mimms
July 16, 2014, 5:51 p.m.

The House on Wed­nes­day boldly stood up to the Gen­er­al Ser­vices Ad­min­is­tra­tion—once known for its lav­ish Las Ve­gas train­ing con­fer­ence—and said: No, you will not re-erect that statue!

The statue in ques­tion, sculp­ted the late artist Dmitri Hadzi, is called “Red Moun­tains,” and it is, as mem­bers ar­gued Tues­day, a threat to na­tion­al se­cur­ity.

The 5-foot-by-17-foot-by-5-foot ab­stract struc­ture stood in front of the Hugo L. Black fed­er­al court­house in Birm­ing­ham, Ala., from 1991 to 2012, when it was re­moved to al­low work­ers to re­pair the entry plaza. Fol­low­ing the con­struc­tion, GSA—which first com­mis­sioned the piece from Hadzi, and sev­er­al oth­ers scattered across the na­tion—planned to re­in­stall it and was work­ing with the U.S. Dis­trict Court to do so.

But Alabama Reps. Spen­cer Bachus, a Re­pub­lic­an, and Terri Sewell, a Demo­crat, have co­sponsored an amend­ment that would pre­vent GSA from us­ing any fund­ing to re­in­stall the statue, warn­ing that it rep­res­ents a se­cur­ity threat. That amend­ment was agreed to by a voice vote on Tues­day and at­tached the Fin­an­cial Ser­vices ap­pro­pri­ations bill, which passed the House on Wed­nes­day.

Bachus and Sewell ar­gue that the struc­ture—which sat in the same loc­a­tion for 11 years—poses a ser­i­ous threat to the court­house, cit­ing re­ports from Ka­ron Bow­dre, the chief judge for the North­ern Dis­trict of Alabama, and U.S. Mar­shal Mar­tin Kee­ley.

“Chief Justice Bow­dre noted, in cor­res­pond­ence to GSA, that the loc­a­tion of the statue will be roughly 10 to 12 feet from the only pub­lic en­trance door, which is com­pletely made of glass and, fur­ther, that the monu­ment would cre­ate a fatal fun­nel where someone could hide be­hind the statue and pos­sibly not be seen and cause a se­cur­ity risk,” Sewell noted in re­marks on the House floor Tues­day.

Ren­ato Danese, whose gal­lery con­trols the es­tate of the late Hadzi, was shocked Wed­nes­day when in­formed that Con­gress was mov­ing to pre­vent the statue from be­ing re­in­stalled (though he was also un­aware that it had been re­moved). “That’s a tragedy,” Danese said, not­ing that Hadzi was not only a pro­fess­or at Har­vard Uni­versity and widely re­spec­ted artist in his time, but also a World War II vet­er­an who fought in the Pa­cific. He ad­ded that it was a par­tic­u­lar “shame” be­cause Hadzi was com­mis­sioned to cre­ate the sculp­ture and it had already been fun­ded by tax­pay­ers.

“I worked at the Na­tion­al En­dow­ment for the Arts when I was young­er,” Danese said. “And there were myri­ad op­por­tun­it­ies for pub­lic ser­vants and elec­ted of­fi­cials to ob­ject to sculp­ture that they thought might be too av­ant-garde, but they would of­ten raise the specter of pub­lic safety as an ex­cuse.”¦ I’m not pro­pos­ing that that was the case in this in­stance.”

Bachus spokes­man Tim John­son said that his boss’s ob­jec­tions to the statue had noth­ing to do with its aes­thet­ic ap­peal, not­ing that his ar­gu­ment was based solely “on the se­cur­ity con­cerns” raised by Bow­dre and Kee­ley. Sewell’s chief of staff, Nich­ole Fran­cis, said in a state­ment that Sewell’s amend­ment also has noth­ing to do with aes­thet­ics, but that it “stems purely from se­cur­ity con­cerns” that were presen­ted on be­half of the court.

This story was up­dated at 4:54 on Thursday with com­ment from Rep. Sewell’s of­fice.

What We're Following See More »
TALKING CLIMATE CHANGE
Al Gore Meeting with Ivanka Trump
44 minutes ago
THE LATEST
PLENTIFUL OIL RESERVES
Trump Native American Council Recommends Privatizing Indian Land
50 minutes ago
THE LATEST

A group advising Donald Trump on Native American issues is encouraging him to privatize Indian reservations, taking the land out of the hands of the "suffocating federal bureaucracy." Currently, tribes have rights to the land but don't own it, meaning they can drill, but only under strenuous government restriction. Markwayne Mullin, a Republican congressman from Oklahoma and a member of the Cherokee tribe thinks the plan would be supported by Native American tribes nationally.

Source:
IT’S OFFICIAL
Trump to Nominate Carson to Lead HUD
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

As has been rumored for a week, Donald Trump will nominate Ben Carson, his former rival, to lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development. In a statement, Trump said, "We have talked at length about my urban renewal agenda and our message of economic revival, very much including our inner cities. Ben shares my optimism about the future of our country and is part of ensuring that this is a Presidency representing all Americans. He is a tough competitor and never gives up."

Source:
TOO COSTLY, SAYS GREEN PARTY
Stein Drops Pennsylvania Recount
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Supporters of Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein on Saturday withdrew a last-ditch lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court aimed at forcing a statewide ballot recount, another major setback in the effort to verify the votes in three states that provided President-elect Donald Trump his margin of victory. Ms. Stein’s campaign announced in a statement Saturday that the Pennsylvania lawsuit had been dropped after the court demanded that a $1 million bond be posted by the 100 Pennsylvania residents who brought the suit."

Source:
ANOTHER MORNING TWEETSTORM
Trump Threatens 35% Tariff on Companies that Move Overseas
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a series of early-morning tweets on Sunday, Donald Trump threatened companies that attempt to relocate out of the country. "Any business that leaves our country for another country, fires its employees, builds a new factory or plant in the other country, and then thinks it will sell its product back into the U.S. without retribution or consequence, is WRONG!," he wrote. "There will be a tax on our soon to be strong border of 35% for these companies."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login