U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry voiced openness to proposals that would automatically tighten Iran sanctions under certain conditions, al-Monitor reports.
Addressing a group of Jewish legislators behind closed doors, the top U.S. diplomat on Thursday said he would personally consider imposing triggered penalties in a bid to secure a deal on Iran’s bomb-usable nuclear activities. The potential measures would take effect if an international agreement on the matter is not reached within a specific period.
Kerry stressed that the Obama administration had not signed off on the plan, according to multiple U.S. lawmakers. Tehran previously threatened to pull back from negotiations in response to such measures.
“He said it might be useful as a spur,” one of the insiders said. “But he said he hadn’t checked with the White House.”
Kerry’s reported remark prompted a favorable initial response from some lawmakers.
“I sensed an openness toward a sanctions bill that would be triggered by future events — or untriggered by positive future events. … I’d like to work on that,” said Representative Brad Sherman (D-Calif). Sherman was not one of al-Monitor’s sources on Kerry’s comments.
The State Department said it remains formally against adopting any new penalties against Iran.
“Our position has not changed — we do not support additional nuclear-related sanctions while we negotiate,” spokeswoman Marie Harf wrote in an e-mail. “We will continue consulting closely with Congress, [which] has played a key role in building the sanctions regime we have in place right now, about the comprehensive negotiations and the path forward.”
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."