Western negotiators may float fast curbs on key Iran sanctions in a bid for additional restrictions on Tehran’s disputed atomic efforts, Reuters reports.
Nations in talks with Iran are weighing whether to suggest lifting measures targeting a range of Iranian business sectors, envoys told the news service for a Thursday article. The moves would take place in exchange for additional limitations on Iran’s atomic activities, which are ostensibly peaceful but could help the nation build nuclear arms.
“When Iran does something, then we can respond with sanctions relief,” one of the envoys said. “The whole process will take years.”
The news came as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry reportedly suggested he was willing to consider additional sanctions aimed at closing gaps now dividing Tehran from six other negotiating countries. The sides were reportedly discussing terms for continuing nuclear negotiations beyond Sunday, when an interim atomic accord is scheduled to expire.
The proposed offer reportedly would lift economic penalties that nations could quickly re-impose over any Iranian violations of a longer-term nuclear compromise. According to one expert, international firms would want clear guidelines for implementing such terms and avoiding U.S. penalties.
“Overcoming the reticence of international banks to do business with Iran will require the [six powers] to issue clear regulatory guidance about which multilateral sanctions are lifted,” says a written analysis by Elizabeth Rosenberg, a specialist with the Center for a New American Security.
Mark Dubowitz, head of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said any effort to “front-load relief too significantly” would prompt a “backlash” from U.S. lawmakers.
Certain U.S. business groups, though, appeared ready to resist any new congressional effort to hit Iran with new economic penalties, Foreign Policy reported on Thursday.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.