A Virginia Court Has Struck Down the State’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban

The federal appeals decision upholds a February ruling that found the ban violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause.

RICHMOND, VA - MAY 13: A same-sex marriage supporter wears a rainbow cape behind 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals after a court hearing May 13, 2014 in Richmond, Virginia. Three judges from the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments from both sides of the case that seeks to determine whether Virginia's same sex marriage ban is constitutional. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
Emma Roller
July 28, 2014, 9:56 a.m.

The U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the 4th Cir­cuit in Vir­gin­ia has struck down that state’s same-sex mar­riage ban as un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, by a 2-1 vote.

The de­cision Monday up­held a rul­ing by U.S. Judge Aren­da L. Wright Al­len in Feb­ru­ary that found the ban vi­ol­ates the U.S. Con­sti­tu­tion’s equal pro­tec­tion clause. In 2006, Vir­gin­ia passed an amend­ment to the state Con­sti­tu­tion de­clar­ing mar­riage to be between a man and a wo­man.

Here is the key por­tion of Judge Henry F. Floyd’s rul­ing:

We re­cog­nize that same-sex mar­riage makes some people deeply un­com­fort­able. However, in­er­tia and ap­pre­hen­sion are not le­git­im­ate bases for deny­ing same-sex couples due pro­cess and equal pro­tec­tion of the laws. Civil mar­riage is one of the corner­stones of our way of life. It al­lows in­di­vidu­als to cel­eb­rate and pub­licly de­clare their in­ten­tions to form lifelong part­ner­ships, which provide un­par­alleled in­tim­acy, com­pan­ion­ship, emo­tion­al sup­port, and se­cur­ity. The choice of wheth­er and whom to marry is an in­tensely per­son­al de­cision that al­ters the course of an in­di­vidu­al’s life. Deny­ing same-sex couples this choice pro­hib­its them from par­ti­cip­at­ing fully in our so­ci­ety, which is pre­cisely the type of se­greg­a­tion that the Four­teenth Amend­ment can­not coun­ten­ance.

Fed­er­al judges in oth­er states such as Col­or­ado, Nevada, Utah, and Wis­con­sin have struck down sim­il­ar state bans in the past year, with vary­ing suc­cess. In Utah’s case, the state ban could go all the way to the U.S. Su­preme Court.

Cor­rec­tion: A pre­vi­ous ver­sion of this post misid­en­ti­fied a por­tion of the court’s opin­ion.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
1 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login