Air Force Defends Shielding Nuclear Force from Service Cutbacks

Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James and service Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh speak to reporters at the Pentagon on Wednesday. The leaders defended a decision to shield nuclear-weapons personnel from the cutbacks that are being implemented in other parts of the service.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
July 31, 2014, 7:48 a.m.

Air Force brass on Wed­nes­day de­fen­ded their de­cision to spare nuc­le­ar-arms per­son­nel from the force cut­backs hap­pen­ing in oth­er parts of the ser­vice.

The Air Force an­nounced in June that it had de­cided to re­tain 4,000 air­men work­ing in the nuc­le­ar mis­sion who would oth­er­wise have faced pos­sible in­vol­un­tary sep­ar­a­tion from the ser­vice. In ex­plain­ing the de­cision, Air Force Sec­ret­ary De­borah Lee James said it was ne­ces­sary to have “full man­ning in our nuc­le­ar po­s­i­tions” be­cause of the “vi­tal im­port­ance of this mis­sion.” Earli­er this spring, the sec­ret­ary told the Air Force Times that due to budget con­straints the ser­vice in­ten­ded to re­duce its act­ive-duty force by 16,700 per­son­nel in the next fisc­al year.

At a Pentagon press con­fer­ence, James said it was ne­ces­sary for the Air Force to pri­or­it­ize its mis­sions. “Nuc­le­ar is num­ber one. And people need to un­der­stand that,” she was quoted as say­ing in an of­fi­cial tran­script.

The Air Force this year has pub­licly shown more con­cern for its stra­tegic de­terrence mis­sion, after a num­ber of scan­dals high­lighted low mor­ale and a lack of pro­fes­sion­al­ism by some air­men as­signed to main­tain, op­er­ate and pro­tect the ser­vice’s ar­sen­al of stra­tegic nuc­le­ar-tipped mis­siles.

Of­fi­cial in­vest­ig­a­tions and in­de­pend­ent ana­lys­is of the prob­lem con­cluded that a num­ber of mis­sileers per­ceived that the nuc­le­ar arms mis­sion had be­come a lower pri­or­ity for ser­vice lead­ers, as evid­enced, for ex­ample, by the lack of at­ten­tion be­ing giv­en to their de­grad­ing sup­port in­fra­struc­ture.

“We’re shift­ing re­sources and we’re shift­ing per­son­nel,” James said on Wed­nes­day. “The per­son­nel aren’t all there on sta­tion yet, but they’ll be com­ing.”

The Air Force in June said it was re­dir­ect­ing $50 mil­lion in fisc­al 2014 funds to­ward the im­me­di­ate re­hab­il­it­a­tion of the in­fra­struc­ture that nuc­le­ar air­men rely on. The money also would help to ad­dress cer­tain “people is­sues,” ac­cord­ing to the ser­vice.

What We're Following See More »
Clinton Rips Into Trump
29 minutes ago

Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.

Quinnipiac Has Clinton Over 50%
3 hours ago

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.

Trump Not on Ballot in Minnesota
5 hours ago
Chelsea to Stay on Board of Clinton Foundation
5 hours ago

Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."

Navy Calls Iranian Ships’ Actions Dangerous, Unprofessional
6 hours ago

"Four Iranian ships made reckless maneuvers close to a U.S. warship this week, the Pentagon said Thursday, in an incident that officials said could have led to dangerous escalation." The four Iranian vessels engaged in a "high-speed intercept" of a U.S. destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz. A Navy spokesman said the Iranina actions "created a dangerous, harassing situation that could have led to further escalation including additional defensive measures" by the destroyer.