Air Force Defends Shielding Nuclear Force from Service Cutbacks

Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James and service Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh speak to reporters at the Pentagon on Wednesday. The leaders defended a decision to shield nuclear-weapons personnel from the cutbacks that are being implemented in other parts of the service.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald
July 31, 2014, 7:48 a.m.

Air Force brass on Wed­nes­day de­fen­ded their de­cision to spare nuc­le­ar-arms per­son­nel from the force cut­backs hap­pen­ing in oth­er parts of the ser­vice.

The Air Force an­nounced in June that it had de­cided to re­tain 4,000 air­men work­ing in the nuc­le­ar mis­sion who would oth­er­wise have faced pos­sible in­vol­un­tary sep­ar­a­tion from the ser­vice. In ex­plain­ing the de­cision, Air Force Sec­ret­ary De­borah Lee James said it was ne­ces­sary to have “full man­ning in our nuc­le­ar po­s­i­tions” be­cause of the “vi­tal im­port­ance of this mis­sion.” Earli­er this spring, the sec­ret­ary told the Air Force Times that due to budget con­straints the ser­vice in­ten­ded to re­duce its act­ive-duty force by 16,700 per­son­nel in the next fisc­al year.

At a Pentagon press con­fer­ence, James said it was ne­ces­sary for the Air Force to pri­or­it­ize its mis­sions. “Nuc­le­ar is num­ber one. And people need to un­der­stand that,” she was quoted as say­ing in an of­fi­cial tran­script.

The Air Force this year has pub­licly shown more con­cern for its stra­tegic de­terrence mis­sion, after a num­ber of scan­dals high­lighted low mor­ale and a lack of pro­fes­sion­al­ism by some air­men as­signed to main­tain, op­er­ate and pro­tect the ser­vice’s ar­sen­al of stra­tegic nuc­le­ar-tipped mis­siles.

Of­fi­cial in­vest­ig­a­tions and in­de­pend­ent ana­lys­is of the prob­lem con­cluded that a num­ber of mis­sileers per­ceived that the nuc­le­ar arms mis­sion had be­come a lower pri­or­ity for ser­vice lead­ers, as evid­enced, for ex­ample, by the lack of at­ten­tion be­ing giv­en to their de­grad­ing sup­port in­fra­struc­ture.

“We’re shift­ing re­sources and we’re shift­ing per­son­nel,” James said on Wed­nes­day. “The per­son­nel aren’t all there on sta­tion yet, but they’ll be com­ing.”

The Air Force in June said it was re­dir­ect­ing $50 mil­lion in fisc­al 2014 funds to­ward the im­me­di­ate re­hab­il­it­a­tion of the in­fra­struc­ture that nuc­le­ar air­men rely on. The money also would help to ad­dress cer­tain “people is­sues,” ac­cord­ing to the ser­vice.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
1 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login