A game of chicken is shaping up over the Obama administration’s decision to let the oil industry collect fresh data on energy supplies off the Atlantic Coast.
The Interior Department, over the protests of environmentalists, said in July that it would allow the oil industry to use seismic air cannons to search for oil and gas underneath federal waters in the Atlantic.
But industry trade groups, in new comments to Interior, say that decision means little unless regulators signal that the industry will actually be able to drill for oil if they find it. Otherwise, what’s the incentive to look?
Right now the Atlantic Coast is off-limits to drilling. But oil-and-gas companies want Interior to make clear that the federal 2017-2022 offshore lease sale plan, which is in the early stages of development, will include blocs off the Atlantic Coast states.
The American Petroleum Institute and 10 other groups, in new comments on the plan, say that right now “the timing of the 2017-2022 Five-Year Program development process and industry’s seismic data collection are out of sync.”
They want Interior to include mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic regions in the draft 2017-2022 program. The groups note that under the current permitting timeline for seismic testing, companies will not be able to collect data until early 2015 at the earliest. Add in the data-processing time, and 2016 would be the earliest that regulators and the industry would have new resource estimates from the testing, they say.
“If the Atlantic [Outer Continental Shelf] is not included in the Draft Proposed Program, then new seismic data will likely not be available since the incentive for companies to collect the data—and the prospect of a future lease sale—will be gone,” state the comments from API, America’s Natural Gas Alliance, the National Ocean Industries Association, the International Association of Geophysical Contractors, and other groups.
An API spokesman said the group has heard that the draft plan could be out by the end of 2014. Interior did not provide a timeline Thursday.
What We're Following See More »
Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 49%-44% in a new CNN/ORC poll out Monday afternoon. But it's Gary Johnson's performance, or lack thereof, that's the real story. Johnson, who had cleared 10% in some surveys earlier this fall, as he made a bid to qualify for the debates, is down to 3% support. He must hit 5% nationwide for the Libertarian Party to qualify for some federal matching funds in future elections.
While the organization praised him for being "perhaps the most pro-LGBT presidential nominee in the history of the Republican Party," the Log Cabin Republicans refused to endorse Donald Trump for president. The organization, which is the largest gay organization in the United States, said that Trump failed to earn its endorsement because he surrounded himself with anti-LGBTQ people "and committed himself to supporting legislation such as the so-called 'First Amendment Defense Act' that Log Cabin Republicans opposes."
The majority and minority leader of the House are both saying "California's veterans are not to blame for being mistakenly overpaid, after a Los Angeles Times story revealed that officials are trying to claw back millions in bonuses from California National Guardsmen. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy called the efforts to recoup the money 'disgraceful,' and asked for the Department of Defense to waive the repayments soldiers would be forced to make if they inappropriately received re-enlistment bonuses for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan." Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said she's looking for a "legislative fix" in the lame-duck session.
A new Investor’s Business Daily/TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence poll shows Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump each earning 41% support. On the one hand, the poll has been skewing in Trump's favor this year, relative to other polls. But on the other, data guru Nate Silver called the IBD/TIPP poll the most accurate in 2012.