Proof That the Left Is Ready for a Clinton Presidential Run

Progressives’ fast pushback against Rand Paul shows they’re determined to give Hillary Clinton the upper hand politically on climate change.

Senator Hillary Clinton listens to questions during her confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, January 13, 2009.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Sept. 6, 2014, 1 a.m.

At mid­day Fri­day I pos­ted a short item about GOP Sen. Rand Paul bash­ing Hil­lary Clin­ton over cli­mate change.

Clin­ton called cli­mate change “the most con­sequen­tial, ur­gent, sweep­ing col­lec­tion of chal­lenges we face.” Paul ac­cused Clin­ton of want­ing to battle cli­mate change in­stead of ter­ror­ism.

It was a note­worthy ex­change between a pair of po­ten­tial 2016 con­tenders, but the dis­agree­ment it­self is not par­tic­u­larly sur­pris­ing: Clin­ton is a long­time pro­ponent of cli­mate ac­tion. Paul is a crit­ic of Clin­ton’s and lives on the oth­er side of the par­tis­an di­vide.

It was what happened next that caught my eye: Shortly after Paul’s re­marks, a pro-Clin­ton “rap­id re­sponse” group called Cor­rect The Re­cord cir­cu­lated a state­ment at­tack­ing the Ken­tucky sen­at­or. They also emailed me per­son­ally to (po­litely) in­quire if I might add it to Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s story.

And they wer­en’t alone.

Later in the af­ter­noon, the League of Con­ser­va­tion Voters chimed in with a de­fense of Clin­ton’s re­marks at a green-en­ergy con­fer­ence Thursday night in Nevada, claim­ing that Paul’s re­sponse “re­flects a pro­found lack of un­der­stand­ing of how ser­i­ous a threat” cli­mate change poses.

Nex­t­Gen Cli­mate, the group backed by bil­lion­aire green act­iv­ist Tom Stey­er, also went after Paul for his stance on glob­al warm­ing: “A real threat would come from a sci­ence-den­ier as the lead­er of the free world.”

It re­mains to be seen wheth­er Clin­ton will run in 2016—she says she’ll de­cide early next year. But Fri­day’s press flurry demon­strates that en­vir­on­ment­al groups and oth­ers on the left are already circ­ling the wag­ons be­hind their po­ten­tial front-run­ner. And it’s demon­strat­ive of the cam­paign in­fra­struc­ture that would be await­ing Clin­ton the mo­ment she entered the race.

So what did Paul say that set off the green fury?

He at­tacked Clin­ton dur­ing a Fox News in­ter­view about bat­tling the rad­ic­al Is­lam­ist group IS­IS, ar­guing: “For her to be out there say­ing that the biggest threat to our safety and to our well-be­ing is cli­mate change, I think … goes to the heart of the mat­ter or wheth­er or not she has the wis­dom to lead the coun­try, which I think it’s ob­vi­ous that she doesn’t.”

That promp­ted en­vir­on­ment­al­ists to of­fer re­mind­ers of mil­it­ary plan­ners’ warn­ings about the se­cur­ity di­men­sions of cli­mate change. They said:

“Rather than re­peat­ing tea-party and Koch Broth­ers talk­ing points to deny the sci­ence of cli­mate change, Sen­at­or Paul would be bet­ter served read­ing the De­part­ment of De­fense’s latest Quad­ren­ni­al re­view, which re­cog­nized that the im­pacts of cli­mate change like ex­treme weath­er, drought, and sea-level rise will act as ‘threat mul­ti­pli­ers that will ag­grav­ate stressors abroad such as poverty, en­vir­on­ment­al de­grad­a­tion, polit­ic­al in­stabil­ity, and so­cial ten­sions—con­di­tions that can en­able ter­ror­ist activ­ity and oth­er forms of vi­ol­ence.’ “

Nex­t­Gen Cli­mate, which is bil­lion­aire cli­mate act­iv­ist Tom Stey­er’s group, also made the mil­it­ary link in a state­ment titled “Sci­ence-Den­ier-In-Chief Rand Paul Thinks He Knows Bet­ter Than the Mil­it­ary.”

“Rand Paul, listen to the four-star gen­er­als: 16 re­tired three- and four-star gen­er­als and ad­mir­als is­sued a re­port and iden­ti­fied cli­mate change as a ‘cata­lyst for con­flict,’ ” the group said in a state­ment.

What We're Following See More »
Senate Rules Aims to Speed Confirmation of Nominees
6 minutes ago

"Republicans on Wednesday will begin a push to change Senate rules in a way that would allow the faster confirmation of President Trump's nominees, after months of complaints that Democrats are dragging out the process. The Senate Rules Committee will meet in the afternoon to consider a resolution that would reduce post-cloture debate for most Executive Branch nominees from 30 hours to just 8 hours. The goal is to prevent Democrats from stretching out debate over several days."

GOP Holds onto AZ-08 Seat Narrowly
19 minutes ago

Arizona Republican Debbie Lesko won a special election to fill the deep red seat Trent Franks retired from earlier this year. Unofficial balloting had her up 52.9% to 47.2%. This victory is a bit close for comfort, considering Donald Trump's 21-point victory there in 2016. This victory will do very little to calm GOP nerves five months before Election Day.

Apple CEO To Meet With Trump
53 minutes ago

Apple CEO Tim Cook will meet with President Trump today, "at a time of heightened trade tensions between the U.S. and China with technology caught up in the spat. Both countries have proposed import tariffs on each others' products, but the U.S. has been tough on Chinese technology firms." China is an important market for Apple, and Cook is expected to bring up the worsening trade relationship.

Mick Mulvaney Admits To Selling Access As Representative
1 hours ago
District Court: Trump Must Reopen DACA
1 hours ago

U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ordered the Trump Administration to continue DACA, and for the first time, ordered it be reopened to new applicants. Bates said the decision to end the immigration program was "'arbitrary and capricious' and therefore 'unlawful.' However, he stayed his ruling for 90 days to give the Department of Homeland Security a chance to provide more solid reasoning for ending the program." Bates is the third judge to rule against the Trump administration. "Federal judges in California and New York have also blocked the administration’s plans on [the same] grounds, and ordered the administration to renew work permits for immigrants enrolled in the program."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.