Despite Obama’s Pledge to Curb It, NSA Mass Surveillance Wins Rubber Stamp

Mass surveillance just earned another 90-day blank check, nine months after President Obama promised to rein in the NSA’s spying powers.

A sign stands outside the National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday, June 6, 2013.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Sept. 13, 2014, 5:50 a.m.

In the face of con­gres­sion­al in­ac­tion, a fed­er­al court Fri­day re­newed an or­der al­low­ing the gov­ern­ment to col­lect phone re­cords on vir­tu­ally all calls with­in the United States.

The For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court ap­proved the Justice De­part­ment’s re­quest for an­oth­er 90-day ex­ten­sion of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s con­tro­ver­sial mass-sur­veil­lance pro­gram, ex­posed pub­licly last sum­mer by Ed­ward Snowden and au­thor­ized un­der Sec­tion 215 of the post-9/11 Pat­ri­ot Act. The spy­ing au­thor­ity is next set to ex­pire on Dec. 5.

“Giv­en that le­gis­la­tion has not yet been en­acted, and giv­en the im­port­ance of main­tain­ing the cap­ab­il­it­ies of the Sec­tion 215 tele­phony metadata pro­gram, the gov­ern­ment has sought a 90-day reau­thor­iz­a­tion of the ex­ist­ing pro­gram, as mod­i­fied by the changes the pres­id­ent an­nounced in Janu­ary,” the Justice De­part­ment and Of­fice of the Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence said in a joint state­ment.

The ex­ten­sion marks the third of its kind since Pres­id­ent Obama pledged in Janu­ary to re­form how the NSA spies on Amer­ic­ans dur­ing a ma­jor policy speech de­livered amid with­er­ing scru­tiny of the na­tion’s in­tel­li­gence-gath­er­ing prac­tices. Obama out­lined a series of im­me­di­ate steps to re­form gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance and boost trans­par­ency, but noted he would wait for Con­gress to de­liv­er him a bill be­fore end­ing the bulk col­lec­tion of U.S. call data.

At the time, Obama said he had asked At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er and the in­tel­li­gence com­munity to de­vise “op­tions for a new ap­proach” for phone-re­cords sur­veil­lance “be­fore the pro­gram comes up for reau­thor­iz­a­tion on March 28.” The pres­id­ent ad­ded that “dur­ing this peri­od, I will con­sult with the rel­ev­ant com­mit­tees in Con­gress to seek their views and then seek con­gres­sion­al au­thor­iz­a­tion for the new pro­gram, as needed.”

But at­tempts at NSA re­form on Cap­it­ol Hill this year have been slow go­ing. And in the ab­sence of le­gis­la­tion, the courts have now re­newed the col­lec­tion of tele­phone metadata—the num­bers and time stamps of calls but not their ac­tu­al con­tents—in March, June, and now Septem­ber.

Re­pub­lic­ans have claimed throughout the year that Obama has over­stepped the con­sti­tu­tion­al bounds of his of­fice, a charge that has even brought a law­suit from the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives. But NSA crit­ics have urged Obama to not wait for Con­gress and simply let the phone-re­cords pro­gram lapse. In June, more than two dozen pri­vacy groups sent the pres­id­ent a let­ter ask­ing him to not re­new the pro­gram, a de­cision they said was “solely with­in the au­thor­ity of the De­part­ment of Justice.”

In Ju­ly, Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Patrick Leahy in­tro­duced the USA Free­dom Act, which would ef­fect­ively end the gov­ern­ment’s col­lec­tion and stor­age of phone metadata and in­stead re­quire phone com­pan­ies to re­tain those re­cords, which in­tel­li­gence agen­cies could ob­tain only after earn­ing court ap­prov­al for their quer­ies. The meas­ure is a more am­bi­tious pro­pos­al of a ver­sion of the bill that passed the House in May, and it has ac­crued sup­port from tech com­pan­ies, pri­vacy groups, the ad­min­is­tra­tion, and Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence James Clap­per.

“Con­gress must en­sure that this is the last time the gov­ern­ment re­quests and the court ap­proves the bulk col­lec­tion of Amer­ic­ans’ re­cords,” Leahy said in a state­ment. “This an­nounce­ment un­der­scores, once again, that it is time for Con­gress to en­act mean­ing­ful re­forms to pro­tect in­di­vidu­al pri­vacy.”

In their joint state­ment, the Justice De­part­ment and Of­fice of the Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence en­dorsed the House ver­sion of the USA Free­dom Act, not­ing that “it re­flects a reas­on­able com­prom­ise that pre­serves es­sen­tial in­tel­li­gence com­munity cap­ab­il­it­ies, en­hances pri­vacy and civil liber­ties, and in­creases trans­par­ency.” The state­ment did not dir­ectly com­ment on Leahy’s pack­age.

Des­pite the wide breadth of sup­port for the Free­dom Act, the bill is un­likely to earn a vote in the Sen­ate be­fore the midterm elec­tions, and it could be tabled un­til next year.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.