Marco Rubio Flaps His Hawk Wings

The senator painted himself as a student of neoconservatism Wednesday.

National Journal
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
Emma Roller
Sept. 17, 2014, 11:55 a.m.

Dick Cheney has fi­nally found the Harry Pot­ter to his Al­bus Dumble­dore—Sen. Marco Ru­bio.

In a speech Wed­nes­day, Ru­bio, R-Fla., called Ed­ward Snowden a “trait­or,” out­lined an ag­gress­ive for­eign policy plat­form, and took some not-so-subtle jabs at Pres­id­ent Obama and some of his less-hawk­ish fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans.

Ru­bio’s speech was sponsored by the John Hay Ini­ti­at­ive, an or­gan­iz­a­tion that doesn’t have its own web­site. The group, which is the brainchild of Mitt Rom­ney’s former for­eign policy team, has been dis­creetly work­ing over the past year to help po­ten­tial pres­id­en­tial con­tenders sharpen their for­eign policy chops.

And 2016 provided the sub­text to Ru­bio’s speech on Wed­nes­day, as he verbally sub­tweeted his col­league and fel­low po­ten­tial 2016 can­did­ate Sen. Rand Paul.

“Too many lead­ers in both parties, in­clud­ing our pres­id­ent and some who as­pire to be pres­id­ent, have shown they would rather wait for poll num­bers to change than demon­strate the lead­er­ship ne­ces­sary to shape them,” Ru­bio said. “In­stead of out­lining the costs of in­ac­tion to our people months ago when they should have, they were con­tent to take the polit­ic­al path of least res­ist­ance.”

Ru­bio also used his speech to urge Con­gress to au­thor­ize more de­fense spend­ing—echo­ing a very sim­il­ar pitch that former Vice Pres­id­ent Dick Cheney made at the Amer­ic­an En­ter­prise In­sti­tute one week ago.

“Na­tion­al de­fense is not an area where we can flip a switch when a need sud­denly arises,” he said. “Mod­ern­iz­a­tion, in­nov­a­tion, and train­ing must be sus­tained pri­or­it­ies, even in times of re­l­at­ive peace.”

Com­pare that to part of Cheney’s speech at AEI last week: “Pres­id­ent Obama seems will­fully blind to one of the key facts about the post-9/11 se­cur­ity ap­par­at­us: It is not self-sus­tain­ing. Those pro­grams and policies must be kept strong and cur­rent.”

Ru­bio and Cheney’s sim­patico philo­sophies are not new. Last year, while dis­cuss­ing Ru­bio on Sean Han­nity’s ra­dio show, Cheney said, “Marco’s great…. I’m a big fan of his.” Nor is it news that Ru­bio has be­come the Re­pub­lic­an Party’s new face of neo­con­ser­vat­ism, wheth­er he wants to be or not.

Still, his speech was more defin­it­ive—and at times, more damning—than past re­marks he’s giv­en on the situ­ation in Ir­aq, and Amer­ic­an de­fense in gen­er­al.

On “de­clin­ing Amer­ic­an strength”:

“The trend of de­clin­ing Amer­ic­an strength had been largely in­cid­ent­al among pre­vi­ous ad­min­is­tra­tions, but now it is an act­ive pri­or­ity. Pre­vi­ous pres­id­ents had merely taken their foot off the gas ped­al of Amer­ic­an strength, but Pres­id­ent Obama has stomped on the brake.”

On de­fense spend­ing:

“First came de­fense cuts of $487 bil­lion over 10 years. Then, adding in­sult to in­jury, the sav­ings found in the de­fense budget were re­dir­ec­ted to already bloated do­mest­ic pro­grams.”

“The Army is set to be re­duced to pre-World War II levels. The Navy is at pre-WWI levels. And our Air Force has the smal­lest and old­est com­bat force in its his­tory.”

“Some ar­gue our equip­ment is more cap­able, so our force doesn’t need to be as large. But the world is still the same size. Even the most ad­vanced com­bat air­craft, ship, or sol­dier can only be in one place at a time.”

On in­tel­li­gence op­er­a­tions:

“When our in­tel­li­gence com­munity is fully re­sourced, it is bet­ter po­si­tioned to identi­fy po­ten­tial threats be­fore a single one of our troops or cit­izens is put at risk. Un­for­tu­nately, our in­tel­li­gence cap­ab­il­it­ies have been badly dam­aged un­der this pres­id­ent, and are go­ing to have to be re­built.”

“When our cap­ab­il­it­ies are ex­posed by leaks from with­in the ad­min­is­tra­tion and from trait­ors like Ed­ward Snowden, we are en­dangered. When we cease col­lect­ing on le­git­im­ate tar­gets, we re­duce our aware­ness.”

On draw­ing down ground troops in Afgh­anistan:

“Re­cent re­duc­tions to our Army and Mar­ine Corps have ris­en from the dan­ger­ous il­lu­sion that Amer­ica will nev­er again have sig­ni­fic­ant ground forces in com­bat. But as we’ve learned in Ir­aq, de­clar­ing wars over does not end them. Even as we con­tin­ue to draw down in Afgh­anistan, for in­stance, we need a siz­able force if we want to avoid re­peat­ing the mis­takes of Ir­aq.”

On cy­ber­se­cur­ity:

“The FBI has warned that cy­ber­at­tacks are fast be­com­ing the primary do­mest­ic threat to the United States. Our cy­ber su­peri­or­ity has been dwind­ling for the last dec­ade, and now the U.S. needs to make up for lost time. En­emies should be just as afraid to hack our serv­ers as they are to lob bombs at our cit­ies.”

Rebecca Nelson contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
McCain Returning for Health Care Vote
20 minutes ago
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
5 hours ago
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
6 hours ago

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
6 hours ago

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
6 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.