Why Are So Many People Getting Sentenced to Death in Houston?

Ten counties are responsible for more than a quarter of all U.S. executions, but one in Texas far surpasses all others.

A view of the death chamber from the witness room at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility in Lucasville, Ohio. 
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
Sept. 24, 2014, 1 a.m.

Just 10 U.S. counties—roughly 0.3 per­cent of the na­tion’s total—ac­count for more than a quarter of all the Amer­ic­an ex­e­cu­tions that have been car­ried out since 1976.

Texas’s Har­ris County, which in­cludes Hou­s­ton, is far and away the lead­er in ex­e­cu­tions dur­ing that peri­od. That dis­trict has handed out 122 death sen­tences that were car­ried to com­ple­tion, more than double the next highest. Har­ris County alone is re­spons­ible for more ex­e­cu­tions than any state be­sides Texas.

Dal­las County, which in­cludes the Dal­las-Fort Worth area, comes in second at 53.

Ac­cord­ing to data main­tained by the Death Pen­alty In­form­a­tion Cen­ter, a D.C.-based or­gan­iz­a­tion that op­poses the death pen­alty, the 10 counties with the most ex­e­cu­tions are:

1. Har­ris County (Hou­s­ton), Texas: 122

2. Dal­las County (Dal­las/Fort Worth), Texas: 53

3. Ok­lahoma County (Ok­lahoma City), Ok­lahoma: 40

4. Tar­rant County (Fort Worth), Texas: 38

5. Bex­ar County (San Ant­o­nio), Texas: 37

6. Tulsa County, Ok­lahoma: 17

7. Mont­gomery County, Texas: 16

8. Jef­fer­son County, Texas: 16

9. St. Louis County, Mis­souri: 15

10 (tie). St. Louis City, Mis­souri: 13

10 (tie). Pima County (Tuc­son), Ari­zona: 13

While a tiny por­tion of counties are re­spons­ible for a large share of ex­e­cu­tions since 1976, 85 per­cent of counties—in­clud­ing a ma­jor­ity of those in Texas—have not been re­spons­ible for any ex­e­cu­tions in the last 40 years. Just four of Texas’s 254 counties ac­count for about half of all the state’s ex­e­cu­tions.

The map be­low provides a visu­al il­lus­tra­tion of the county dis­tri­bu­tion of ex­e­cu­tions. Har­ris is rep­res­en­ted by the large purple circle:

Data from us-ex­e­cu­tions.silk.co

States are gen­er­ally re­spons­ible for ad­min­is­ter­ing ex­e­cu­tions, but the sen­tences be­gin at the county level. So why do some counties hand out so many more death-pen­alty sen­tences than oth­ers?

There are some ob­vi­ous factors: Some counties are in states where cap­it­al pun­ish­ment is banned, tak­ing them out of con­sid­er­a­tion. And lar­ger counties, by vir­tue of hav­ing more people, are also likely to have more crimes and more crimes that qual­i­fy for death sen­tences. Har­ris County, for ex­ample, has more than 4 mil­lion people—mak­ing it one of the largest in the coun­try.

Death-pen­alty op­pon­ents, however, have noted dis­crep­an­cies that are un­cor­rel­ated with state laws or county sizes.

A study re­leased last year by the Death Pen­alty In­form­a­tion Cen­ter found that 2 per­cent of counties ac­count for more than half of all death-row sen­tences and ex­e­cu­tions. The re­port ar­gued that death sen­tences “de­pend more on the loc­a­tion of the county line than on the sever­ity of the crime.” In many states, the de­cision to pur­sue a death sen­tence is made by the county’s dis­trict at­tor­ney, a po­s­i­tion that is of­ten elec­ted.

The re­port’s au­thors sug­ges­ted that urb­an areas, largely in the South, where pro­sec­utors have abund­ant re­sources are most likely to pur­sue and achieve a death sen­tence. Be­cause court ap­peals reach­ing up to the Su­preme Court can drag on for years, if not dec­ades, smal­ler counties are less able to tie their hands with a cap­it­al case.

“To take on a death-pen­alty case, that’s a mul­ti­year com­mit­ment of a mil­lion dol­lars or more,” said Richard Di­eter, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Death Pen­alty In­form­a­tion Cen­ter. “If you’re in Hou­s­ton, there are 200 at­tor­neys in the D.A.’s of­fice, at least. They can do a lot of death-pen­alty cases.”

“Cer­tain pro­sec­utors, par­tic­u­larly in cer­tain re­gions, will de­vel­op ex­pert­ise, not just in an abil­ity to se­cure a cap­it­al ver­dict “¦ but to know how to pick a jury that is more death-in­clined,” said Douglas Ber­man, a sen­ten­cing ex­pert at Ohio State Uni­versity’s law school who con­siders him­self neither for or against the death pen­alty.

Pop­u­la­tion in­deed plays a role, Ber­man ad­ded, but not just be­cause the sheer amount of crimes com­mit­ted. By hav­ing more hom­icides on their dock­et, pro­sec­utors can cherry-pick the cases most likely to turn back a cap­it­al sen­tence and pur­sue those ones ag­gress­ively, he said.

“No pro­sec­utor likes to lose a case,” Ber­man said. “They would es­pe­cially by frus­trated to put all this en­ergy in pur­su­ing a death sen­tence and have it come back as a life sen­tence. You sort of take a gulp and ask your­self, ‘Wow, is that sort of case right for the death pen­alty?’ “

Death-pen­alty ad­voc­ates don’t dis­pute that a pro­sec­utori­al dis­cre­tion plays a role in de­term­in­ing how many cap­it­al sen­tences ori­gin­ate from a spe­cif­ic county. But that hardly in­dic­ates the sys­tem is broken, said Kent Scheide­g­ger, the chief law­yer for the Sac­ra­mento-based Crim­in­al Justice Leg­al Found­a­tion.

“The reas­on we elect our pro­sec­utors loc­ally is that we can have that sort of in­flu­ence,” Scheide­g­ger said, adding that those with dis­pro­por­tion­ately low, not high, num­bers of ex­e­cu­tions are prob­lem­at­ic. “There are places where the death pen­alty is not im­posed enough.”

So, why is Har­ris County’s death count so much high­er than any­where else? Former Dis­trict At­tor­ney Johnny Holmes de­serves a lot of cred­it, ac­cord­ing to Di­eter. Dur­ing Holmes’s 21-year ten­ure, which ended in 2000, the “gen­tle­man ranch­er” presided over more than 200 death-row sen­tences.

“His philo­sophy was to seek the death pen­alty of­ten, and he ran on that plat­form,” Di­eter said. “Since Johnny left, the num­ber of death sen­tences [in Har­ris County] has dropped dra­mat­ic­ally.”

The Su­preme Court in 1972 put a morator­i­um on the death pen­alty due to con­cerns it was be­ing ap­plied ran­domly and without suf­fi­cient leg­al guid­ance to jur­ors. But cap­it­al pun­ish­ment was re­in­stated in 1976 with some guidelines in­ten­ded to lim­it sub­ject­ive dis­cre­tion in its sen­ten­cing.

Since 1976, a total of 1,389 ex­e­cu­tions have taken place in the U.S.

What We're Following See More »
White House Adds Five New SCOTUS Candidates
8 hours ago

President Trump added five new names to his Supreme Court short list on Friday, should a need arise to appoint a new justice. The list now numbers 25 individuals. They are: 7th Circuit Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt C. Grant, District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, 11th Circuit Appeals Judge Kevin C. Newsom, and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.

Sessions: DOJ Will No Longer Issue Guidance Documents
9 hours ago

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”

Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
10 hours ago
Steele Says Follow the Money
12 hours ago

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
12 hours ago

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.