How Ebola Makes Conservatives More Conservative

Conservatives react more strongly to negative things—like disease.

Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Oct. 15, 2014, 1 a.m.

Thomas Eric Duncan, the first per­son to die of Ebola in the United States, came to this coun­try by air. He did not cross the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der. And yet, for some con­ser­vat­ive politi­cians, the ar­rival of Ebola here has piqued con­cerns about the se­cur­ity of the south­ern bor­der.

“If people are com­ing through nor­mal chan­nels [with Ebola],” Sen­ate can­did­ate Scott Brown said re­cently in a ra­dio in­ter­view, “can you ima­gine what they can do through our por­ous bor­ders?” Oth­er politi­cians are like-minded, call­ing for the out­right clos­ure of the bor­der.

The scen­ario that Ebola enters the U.S. through Mex­ico is not out­right im­possible. It’s just un­likely con­sid­er­ing the facts. There have been no re­por­ted cases of Ebola in Mex­ico or Cent­ral Amer­ica. Con­ceiv­ably, it could be pos­sible for someone in­fec­ted with Ebola to enter the United States in a car from Mex­ico. But for that to hap­pen right now, the Ebola car­ri­er would have had to spend some time in West Africa be­fore head­ing to Mex­ico. Then, the per­son would have to travel to the U.S. be­fore the dis­ease’s symp­toms kick in, which can take two to 21 days after ex­pos­ure.

So why are con­ser­vat­ives so con­cerned about the south­ern bor­der in the wake of Ebola? Psy­cho­logy has an an­swer: Ebola is mak­ing con­ser­vat­ives more con­ser­vat­ive.

Let’s step back.

It’s likely that hu­man­ity has evolved to have people with lib­er­al and con­ser­vat­ive minds in any giv­en so­ci­ety. Ac­cord­ing to mount­ing psy­cho­lo­gic­al re­search, lib­er­als tend to be open to new ex­per­i­ences, while con­ser­vat­ives seek to pro­tect what they already have. Of­ten these mind-sets res­ult in polit­ic­al clashes. But the ten­sion between lib­er­al brains and con­ser­vat­ive brains makes sense for sur­viv­al. There are times when it’s im­port­ant to dis­cov­er new things, and there are times when it’s im­port­ant to avoid dangers. The ten­sion between those two strategies is what has fueled hu­man polit­ic­al con­flict for mil­len­nia as groups ar­gue over how a so­ci­ety should be run. But it has also kept us alive.

Through this evol­u­tion­ary lens, con­ser­vat­ism is a strategy to pro­tect a so­ci­ety from harm from both out­siders and dis­eases. Ebola hits this ex­act con­ser­vat­ive nerve—it’s a deadly dis­ease from a for­eign coun­try. Ebola is ac­tiv­at­ing all the evol­u­tion­ary alarms of the con­ser­vat­ive mind.

John Hi­b­bing, a lead­ing re­search­er in polit­ic­al physiology, ex­plains it like this: “What we’ve found is pretty clear and con­sist­ent—that con­ser­vat­ives tend to have more re­ac­tion to neg­at­ive things. We like to see not just if they re­port in a sur­vey-type format wheth­er they are bothered by that, but ac­tu­ally physiolo­gic­ally if there has been a change.”

In his ex­per­i­ments, Hi­b­bing of­ten at­taches elec­trodes to lib­er­al and con­ser­vat­ive par­ti­cipants’ skin and then shows them dis­turb­ing im­ages, such as a man eat­ing a hand­ful of worms. In these tests, con­ser­vat­ives sweat more (i.e., have a stronger gut re­ac­tion) in re­sponse to the dis­gust­ing stim­u­lus. And when Hi­b­bing hooks par­ti­cipants up to eye-track­ing ma­chines, he finds con­ser­vat­ives mon­it­or more closely the things that make them squirm. So they are more read­ily pro­voked and more vi­gil­ant. These dif­fer­ences between lib­er­als and con­ser­vat­ives are likely deep seated in the brain: sci­ent­ists have found that con­ser­vat­ives tend to have lar­ger amy­g­dala, a re­gion of the brain in­volved in fear pro­cessing, than lib­er­als do.

And when people be­come fear­ful, they’re more likely put dis­tance between their group and oth­ers. “Since out-group mem­bers are more likely to carry patho­gens to which mem­bers of the in-group have not yet de­veloped im­munity, avoid­ance of out-groups can be ad­apt­ive when the threat of the dis­ease is sa­li­ent,” UCLA re­search­ers wrote in a 2006 pa­per.

In that pa­per, the re­search­ers found that when par­ti­cipants were primed to think about dis­ease, they “in­creased their pref­er­ence for the Amer­ic­an over the for­eign­er and in­creased their at­trac­tion to the Amer­ic­an.” They be­came less re­cept­ive to out­siders, just like cer­tain politi­cians seem to be do­ing right now in the wake of Ebola.

“It doesn’t mean that con­ser­vat­ives are deeply flawed,” Hi­b­bing said. “From an evol­u­tion­ary point of view, re­spond­ing to neg­at­ive things in the en­vir­on­ment makes a lot of sense. You need to be aware of them.”

Reena Flores contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
WILL FOCUS ON FUNDRAISING
Katie Walsh Leaving White House for Political Role
21 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"President Trump's deputy chief of staff Katie Walsh is leaving her current position to work with political groups whose help the White House is seeking as it plows ahead with an ambitious agenda, two sources familiar with the move told the Washington Examiner." On the one hand, Walsh is said to be a master fundraiser. On the other, she's butted heads with many of her colleagues in the White House.

Source:
MODELED ON “GANG OF 14” DEAL
McCain Aims to Deal with Dems on Gorsuch
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Sen. John McCain is looking to strike a deal with Senate Democrats that would confirm Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, while preserving the right of the minority party to filibuster some nominations. McCain is trying to reprise the "Gang of 14" deal, which temporarily preserved the 60-vote threshold for lower-court nominees. This time around, "a deal would require eight Democrats to vote to advance the nomination in return for a promise that in the future they would be able to block a nominee in extraordinary circumstances." But McCain admitted he's not optimistic.

Source:
WOULD LET STATES DENY FUNDING
Pence Breaks Tie on Planned Parenthood Vote
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The GOP held open for more than an hour a vote on a measure that would "allow states to block federal family-planning funds to Planned Parenthood." Sen. Johnny Isakson, who is recovering from back surgery, was summoned to the floor to make the vote 50-50, after which Vice President Pence broke the tie in favor of the measure. Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski were the lone Republicans to vote against it.

Source:
CONTRADICTS PRESIDENT
Ryan: I Won’t Work with Dems on Healthcare
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) in an interview to be broadcast early Thursday said he does not want to work with Democrats on healthcare legislation, breaking with President Trump's recent comments."

Source:
WILL HE TRY TO PRIMARY THEM?
Trump Puts the Freedom Caucus in His Crosshairs
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login