Is 21 Days Long Enough for Ebola Quarantine?

We really don’t know the upper limits of how long Ebola can remain dormant in the body.

Sean Gallup/Getty Images
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick
Oct. 16, 2014, 11:41 a.m.

Two to 21 days. If a per­son is ex­posed to the Ebola vir­us, that’s the time­frame in which the symp­toms of the dis­ease can mani­fest. The dis­ease kills about half of those it in­fects.

That’s the real­ity for the friends of Thomas Eric Duncan, the first vic­tim of Ebola to die in the United States, who made con­tact with him be­fore his hos­pit­al ad­mis­sion. Ac­cord­ing to NPR, the fam­ily that made con­tact with Duncan “has been ordered not to leave their home and is banned from host­ing any vis­it­ors un­til the 21-day in­cub­a­tion peri­od for Ebola has passed.” So does that mean that on the 22nd day, they are in the clear, com­pletely safe from con­tract­ing Ebola?

No. Sadly, it’s isn’t so simple.

“There is no quar­ant­ine time that will provide ab­so­lute as­sur­ance of no re­sid­ual risk from con­ta­gion,” Charles N. Haas, a mi­cro­bi­o­logy threat re­search­er at Drexel Uni­versity, writes in a re­cently pub­lished pa­per in the Journ­al PLOS Cur­rent Out­breaks.

Symp­toms typ­ic­ally be­gin to ap­pear after nine days, but the World Health Or­gan­iz­a­tion has even re­cor­ded in­stances of a per­son con­tract­ing the dis­ease after 30 days.

A few weeks ago, when Ebola was start­ing to per­meate the news, Haas began to won­der how WHO came to its 21-day quar­ant­ine re­com­mend­a­tion for Ebola. Haas then com­piled all the avail­able data on pre­vi­ous out­breaks. What he found was that, thank­fully, there aren’t many data on past out­breaks. In the past, Ebola has af­fected a few hun­dred people at a time; not the thou­sands who have been blighted in the cur­rent crisis. The small num­ber of data points means that while health au­thor­it­ies may have a good idea of how long Ebola can re­main dormant in the body, they do not know the up­per lim­its of what is pos­sible.

“If I pulled 12 people at ran­dom off the street and meas­ured their height,” Haas ex­plained, “and then used the greatest high of those 12 as an in­dex to what the max­im­um height would be for the hu­man pop­u­la­tion, I would be in­cred­ibly wrong.”

In his ana­lys­is, Haas found that 21 days of quar­ant­ine “does not ab­so­lutely re­duce the risk to zero of some­body sub­sequently be­com­ing symp­to­mat­ic,” he said. De­pend­ing on the data set, he said, there could be as high as a 12 per­cent risk that a per­son will de­vel­op symp­toms bey­ond 21 days.

“While the 21 day quar­ant­ine value cur­rently used may have arose from reas­on­able in­ter­pret­a­tion of early out­break data, this work sug­gests a re­con­sid­er­a­tion is in or­der and that 21 days may not be suf­fi­ciently pro­tect­ive to pub­lic health,” his pa­per con­cludes.

On Oct. 16, WHO pub­lished its pre­lim­in­ary data of the first nine months of the Ebola out­break in the New Eng­land Journ­al of Medi­cine. Draw­ing from the more than 4,000 cases doc­u­mented dur­ing that peri­od, WHO found “ap­prox­im­ately 95 per­cent of the case pa­tients had symp­tom on­set with­in 21 days after ex­pos­ure.” That also means that 5 per­cent of cases mani­fes­ted after 21 days.

The fol­low­ing chart plots the num­ber of cases re­cor­ded at each day after Ebola ex­pos­ure. There are a hand­ful re­por­ted after the 21-day mark.

“Even if you go out to a 30-day time, it only gives you a risk of about eight in 1,000 that someone would still pro­gress to symp­toms after that peri­od,” Haas said. “I wouldn’t want to char­ac­ter­ize that as low or high be­cause that is really a policy de­cision.” At some point, the cost to mon­it­or or quar­ant­ine a pos­sible Ebola con­tam­in­a­tion out­weighs the risks of in­fec­tion. In a small out­break, an eight-in-1,000 chance may not mean much. But in the worst case scen­ari­os, where in­fec­tions could reach 10,000 a week in Decem­ber, those eight in every thou­sand be­gin to add up.

“The bulk of people are de­vel­op­ing symp­toms by 15 days,” Mar­garet Ann Har­ris, a spokes­wo­man for WHO, told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “However, we do not de­clare a coun­try free of Ebola un­til 42 days have passed with no new cases.”

The les­son here isn’t about in­creased pan­ic, or that Ebola will strike the nurses or friends who treated Duncan without warn­ing a month or more from now. It is a les­son on how we should think about and com­mu­nic­ate about vir­al out­breaks. Sci­ence works on con­fid­ence in­ter­vals, dis­tri­bu­tions, and prob­ab­il­it­ies, which makes it tough to give an ex­act quar­ant­ine peri­od after which a per­son is safe from con­tract­ing Ebola. Sci­ence is not about ab­so­lutes.

Health au­thor­it­ies are get­ting a handle on this dis­ease, but it’s a tricky line as­sur­ing the pub­lic to be con­fid­ent that the out­break won’t reach apo­ca­lyptic levels, while be­ing real­ist­ic that Ebola may still hold some sur­prises. “I think a bit of frank shar­ing of the lack of know­ledge would ac­tu­ally be help­ful in hav­ing the pub­lic un­der­stand, Haas says.



Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.