Could the ‘Perfect’ Campaign Lose?

Kay Hagan is trying to prove months of good work can withstand a national climate that’s threatening other Dems. Republicans are confident she can’t.

Oct. 23, 2014, 4:04 p.m.

RALEIGH, N.C.—It took Kay Hagan 10 minutes to cov­er everything she wanted to say about pub­lic edu­ca­tion. The 61-year-old sen­at­or had picked the stu­dent uni­on here at North Car­o­lina State Uni­versity to de­liv­er a sem­in­ar of her own about all the ways she was build­ing up edu­ca­tion and all the ways her op­pon­ent Thom Tillis was tear­ing it down. She left no cri­ti­cism un­men­tioned: Tillis, who is speak­er of the state House, was even ac­cused of mak­ing it more ex­pens­ive for col­lege stu­dents to buy food.

Un­til a few weeks ago, this was Hagan’s secret sauce, the reas­on her cam­paign re­tained a slight lead while Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates else­where wil­ted dur­ing the sum­mer and early fall. The one-term sen­at­or had re­lent­lessly fo­cused on edu­ca­tion fund­ing in Au­gust and Septem­ber, beat­ing up on her GOP foe’s budget-cut­ting ten­ure like a box­er de­term­ined to meth­od­ic­ally wear down her op­pon­ent with body blows. For Hagan, keep­ing the fo­cus of her fed­er­al race on a loc­al is­sue had the be­ne­fit of in­su­lat­ing her­self from the tox­ic na­tion­al at­mo­sphere. As one Hagan ad­viser joked, “We turned this in­to a school-board race.”

But a smat­ter­ing of a few dozen stu­dents and journ­al­ists gathered to listen to Hagan had ap­par­ently heard enough. When the sen­at­or asked if the stu­dents seated in front of her—or the journ­al­ists milling be­hind them—had ad­di­tion­al ques­tions about her edu­ca­tion agenda, nobody spoke. When an aide then asked the me­dia if they had any ques­tions on oth­er top­ics, we nearly sur­roun­ded her.

Hagan tried to steer the dis­cus­sion back to­ward edu­ca­tion, but the ques­tions fo­cused else­where: Was she hy­po­crit­ic­al to com­plain about out­side-group money when some of them were back­ing her can­did­acy? Why was she not at­tend­ing the de­bate later that night? And had she re­versed her­self last week when she said she sup­por­ted a lim­ited travel ban to Ebola-stricken coun­tries?

“From the very, very be­gin­ning,” Hagan said, “I said a travel ban could be part “…”

A re­port­er cut her off. “Could or should be?”

“You know, I said it could be part of a broad­er strategy,” she con­tin­ued. “And that’s ex­actly where we are.”

Journ­al­ists rarely ask the ques­tions politi­cians want, no mat­ter the situ­ation. But the ex­change neatly cap­tured a shift­ing dy­nam­ic in North Car­o­lina: Since the start of Oc­to­ber, the is­sues at the con­test’s fore­front have moved from the loc­al mat­ters pre­ferred by Team Hagan to the na­tion­al top­ics, Ebola and IS­IS, that have be­ne­fit­ted Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates na­tion­wide. And it’s cre­ated a sense that Tillis, whose own cam­paign has be­come a punch­ing bag for Re­pub­lic­ans crit­ic­al of its ef­forts, could sneak through to a last-minute vic­tory.

In­ter­views with nearly a dozen top Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ives re­vealed most of them share two ba­sic as­sess­ments of the race. For about a six-month stretch start­ing in April, thanks mostly to her own cam­paign’s su­per­i­or ef­forts, just about everything went right for Kay Hagan. And still, she might lose.

“If she loses, it’s be­cause of the na­tion­al en­vir­on­ment,” said Thomas Mills, a vet­er­an Demo­crat­ic strategist in the state. “And if Hagan wins, it’s be­cause of her cam­paign.”

The ter­rain has morph­ed in North Car­o­lina; now it’s up to Hagan and her cam­paign to prove they can hold on to the lead for an­oth­er 10 days.

The would-be polit­ic­al geni­us

Thom Tillis skips steps when he walks up stairs. He had just left a large room on the first floor of the state GOP headquar­ters, where he and Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee Chair­man Re­ince Priebus last Sat­urday had told a few dozen ded­ic­ated sup­port­ers that North Car­o­lina was “ground zero” for re­gain­ing the Sen­ate ma­jor­ity. The top-rank­ing state House Re­pub­lic­an, now sit­ting in a second-floor board­room, ex­plains to me that he nor­mally does moun­tain-bik­ing to stay in shape but has had to cut back be­cause of the busy-ness of a Sen­ate cam­paign—hence, the stair-skip­ping.

The 54-year-old looks like a polit­ic­al op­er­at­ive—fit, with closely trimmed white hair and a sports coat paired with jeans—and he talks like one, too. He’s the only Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate in re­cent memory to de­clare that he wants to run the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Sen­at­ori­al Com­mit­tee, and most who have watched his met­eor­ic rise in the state Le­gis­lature (he was first elec­ted there in only 2006) de­scribe him as a polit­ic­al an­im­al.

So it’s con­fus­ing that the story of his cam­paign would be one of stra­tegic mis­steps, of strug­gling to build a co­hes­ive case against his op­pon­ent. Only the last-month in­tru­sion of the na­tion­al polit­ic­al cli­mate has giv­en his can­did­acy hope.

Tillis him­self seemed to ac­know­ledge one of the prob­lems halfway through a stem-winder dur­ing Sat­urday’s rally. He had already checked off a list of cri­ti­cisms that soun­ded like a sum­mary of everything that’s gone wrong for the White House this year: the dif­fi­cult im­ple­ment­a­tion of Obama­care, scan­dal at Vet­er­ans Ad­min­is­tra­tion hos­pit­als, the rise of IS­IS in Syr­ia and Ir­aq, and the ar­rival of the Ebola vir­us in Dal­las. He even­tu­ally me­andered in­to a cri­ti­cism of the stim­u­lus and Hagan’s fam­ily mem­bers who be­ne­fit­ted from it, be­fore seem­ing to catch him­self.

“I could go on and on,” he said. “The prob­lem with Sen­at­or Hagan is that there are so many things to talk about that you can al­most not get the mes­sage out.”

In­deed, for months it was hard to tell what Tillis’ case against Hagan was, bey­ond his con­ten­tion that she was an ally of the un­pop­u­lar pres­id­ent. It had the feel of a cam­paign that was re­act­ing to the is­sue of the day in­stead of de­lib­er­ately build­ing a case for months. (The Re­pub­lic­an even turned the series of high-pro­file fail­ures of the Secret Ser­vice in­to an ar­gu­ment that if Obama couldn’t pro­tect the White House, he couldn’t pro­tect Amer­ica.)

“People can only ab­sorb so much, so you really have to fo­cus on her fail­ure with jobs and eco­nomy, her fail­ure on the safety and se­cur­ity is­sues,” he told me in an in­ter­view. “You have so many friends call up and say, ‘What about this po­s­i­tion or an­oth­er po­s­i­tion?’ EPA reg­u­la­tions are an­oth­er ex­ample.”

I asked wheth­er he still thinks his cri­ti­cism of the Secret Ser­vice was fair game. “I think it weaves in­to the nar­rat­ive of what I con­sider a crisis of com­pet­ence,” he said. “Wheth­er it’s the IRS scan­dal, Benghazi, NSA, the Secret Ser­vice, it just really raises a ques­tion about this pres­id­ent’s abil­ity to lead.”

But since the on­set of Oc­to­ber, Tillis’s kit­chen-sink ap­proach has not­ably left one is­sue out—edu­ca­tion. It wasn’t al­ways the case: The GOP cam­paign had tried to push back on at­tacks that he had cut edu­ca­tion fund­ing and poin­ted to le­gis­la­tion he passed over the sum­mer to raise teach­er pay. But, out­gunned by Hagan, one of the cycle’s top fun­draisers, and Demo­crat­ic-aligned out­side groups, the de­fense fell flat.

So Tillis moved on. And he did so about the same time the na­tion­al cli­mate seemed to take hold in North Car­o­lina, giv­ing him free rein to run TV ads about IS­IS, Hagan’s missed hear­ings for the Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, and the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol’s Ebola mis­haps. For the first time, his cam­paign was cut­ting through. He’s also be­ne­fit­ted from ma­jor in­vest­ments from out­side groups, loc­al stor­ies that put Hagan on the de­fens­ive, and a de­bate this week that Hagan de­clined to at­tend—giv­ing the Re­pub­lic­an es­sen­tially a free hour-long ad­vert­ise­ment. The state’s par­tic­u­lar war­i­ness to­ward the Re­pub­lic­an Party, a prob­lem in le­gis­lat­ive races there, has lif­ted some­what for the fed­er­al race.

“What you’re see­ing na­tion­ally, what you’re see­ing on the ground, is what people are start­ing to pick up on,” said Jordan Shaw, Tillis’s cam­paign man­ager. “She delayed a lot of this move­ment for as long as she could. But now that we’ve had de­bates, now that she’s been forced to talk about is­sues oth­er than edu­ca­tion, I think you’re start­ing to see the nar­rat­ive of this race has changed.”

Tillis might not have dis­covered the one de­fin­ing mes­sage of his cam­paign, but he also might not need one.

Back in the state GOP’s board­room, Tillis is con­fid­ent the comeback is already un­der­way. “We’re mov­ing in the right dir­ec­tion,” he said.

Hagan strikes back

Hagan is vis­ibly shiv­er­ing when she tells me she’s “frus­trated” with the pres­id­ent. She’s in Ashev­ille, a city em­bed­ded in the Ap­palachi­an Moun­tains on the state’s west­ern edge, and it’s a chilly fall Sunday morn­ing. She’s at a small biod­ies­el pro­duc­tion plant for the first stop on a nine-city “mes­sage tour” of the state.

“It seems to take a peri­od of time be­fore it’s re­cog­nized that it’s a very im­port­ant is­sue that needs more time and at­ten­tion,” Hagan says dur­ing a brief in­ter­view when I ask how she feels about the pres­id­ent’s ap­par­ent slow-footed re­sponse to the VA scan­dal and Ebola. It’s more a care­fully worded slap-on-the wrist than sear­ing in­dict­ment, but this close to Elec­tion Day, with a lib­er­al base to mo­tiv­ate, it counts as real cri­ti­cism.

Hagan’s cam­paign doesn’t pre­tend the race’s en­vir­on­ment hasn’t changed or that Obama is any­thing oth­er than a drag on the tick­et. They’re just equally con­vinced that the last­ing dam­age of their edu­ca­tion cam­paign won’t dis­sip­ate so quickly, and that the cam­paign’s new at­tack will leave a mark of its own.

The best be­ne­fit of Hagan’s fo­cus on edu­ca­tion might not be the dam­age it did in and of it­self. In­stead, it’s the lux­ury it provided the North Car­o­lina Demo­crat, who was able to save all of her TV ads on abor­tion rights and con­tra­cep­tion ac­cess un­til Oc­to­ber. While some Demo­crat­ic cam­paigns have beaten that mes­sage in­to the ground since the sum­mer, she’s kept those at­tacks fresh for the home stretch.

“Every­body’s got a plan un­til they get hit in the mouth, but it was al­ways our in­ten­tion to hold back the speak­er’s re­cord on wo­men’s is­sues un­til after we had fully defined his edu­ca­tion cuts and tax policies,” said one cam­paign strategist tied to the Hagan cam­paign. “Each of those ex­changes dam­aged his cred­ib­il­ity, mak­ing his re­cord of op­pos­ing equal pay and de­fund­ing Planned Par­ent­hood that much stronger of an in­dict­ment.”

It’s hard to re­mem­ber now, when Hagan has out­per­formed not only red-state Demo­crats like Mark Pry­or and Mary Landrieu but blue-state in­cum­bents like Mark Ud­all, that she was once seen as one of the party’s weak­est can­did­ates. She didn’t have the fam­ous last name like Pry­or or Landrieu, and her poll num­bers tumbled dur­ing the winter when Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity launched a mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar TV ad blitz.

She did just about everything right since then.

“For her to win, she had to run a per­fect cam­paign,” Mills said. “And she’s run a damn near per­fect cam­paign.”

For months, polls showed Hagan with a slight lead in a three-way race that in­cluded the Liber­tari­an can­did­ate, Sean Haugh. Two re­cent sur­veys showed Tillis gain­ing ground, even hold­ing a slight lead, and one Re­pub­lic­an strategist track­ing loc­al races says he’s seen a bump in Tillis sup­port. But Demo­crats are adam­ant that Hagan’s num­bers haven’t dipped, and there’s been a not­able ab­sence of qual­ity polling in North Car­o­lina.

Re­mark­ably, both cam­paigns gen­er­ally agree about how the race has shaped up thus far: Tillis’s pop­ular­ity took a dive dur­ing the sum­mer’s le­gis­lat­ive ses­sion, Hagan’s edu­ca­tion-fo­cused mes­sage con­sumed the months of Au­gust and Septem­ber, Tillis was smart to stop re­spond­ing to those at­tacks, na­tion­al is­sues have taken hold of the con­ver­sa­tion in Oc­to­ber, and the race is very close.

They just dis­agree on one thing: Is the en­vir­on­ment or Hagan’s cam­paign go­ing to win out in the end?

What We're Following See More »
Congress, White House Reach Disaster Aid Deal
7 hours ago
Banker Indicted in New York for Bribery Scheme with Manafort
10 hours ago
Modi Wins Reelection as India's PM
10 hours ago
Trump Headed to UK Next Month
11 hours ago
Trump Loses in Court Again
1 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.