Harry Reid Moves for Senate Vote on NSA Reform

The Senate majority leader is hoping to move the bulk data-collection bill before his party returns to the minority.

A sign stands outside the National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday, June 6, 2013.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Nov. 12, 2014, 12:42 p.m.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id on Wed­nes­day moved to ad­vance a bill that would ush­er in sweep­ing re­forms to the gov­ern­ment’s most con­tro­ver­sial do­mest­ic-spy­ing pro­gram, more than a year after Ed­ward Snowden’s leaks ex­posed it pub­licly.

Re­id filed for clo­ture on the meas­ure late Wed­nes­day, a sur­pris­ing move in­ten­ded to ad­dress the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s mass-sur­veil­lance prac­tices be­fore Re­pub­lic­ans take over the Sen­ate next year. To ad­vance fur­ther, the le­gis­la­tion would need 60 votes to end de­bate, and then a ma­jor­ity vote to pass it through the cham­ber.

The bill, the USA Free­dom Act, would ef­fect­ively end the gov­ern­ment’s bulk col­lec­tion of metadata—the num­bers and time stamps of phone calls but not their ac­tu­al con­tent. Phone com­pan­ies such as Ve­r­i­zon would in­stead re­tain those re­cords, which in­tel­li­gence agen­cies could ob­tain only after be­ing gran­ted ap­prov­al from the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court. The bill would also ush­er in a host of ad­di­tion­al pri­vacy and trans­par­ency meas­ures, in­clud­ing a more pre­cise defin­i­tion of what can be con­sidered a sur­veil­lance tar­get.

The meas­ure is sponsored by Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Chair­man Patrick Leahy, and has earned co­spon­sors ran­ging from Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Ted Cruz to lib­er­al Sens. Ed­ward Mar­key and Chuck Schu­mer. It also boasts sup­port from a wide ar­ray of tech com­pan­ies, pri­vacy and civil-liber­ties groups, the White House, and seni­or mem­bers of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity.

The bill is a re­worked ver­sion of a sim­il­ar bill that passed the House in May, though that ver­sion was ac­cused by pri­vacy ad­voc­ates and the tech in­dustry of be­ing “watered down” dur­ing 11th-hour ne­go­ti­ations.

Leahy spent months work­ing to build con­sensus around his bill, and he nearly achieved it be­fore de­b­ut­ing the meas­ure in late Ju­ly. It still faces op­pos­i­tion from some de­fense hawks, in­clud­ing Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein. And two of the loudest crit­ics of NSA spy­ing, Sens. Ron Wyden and Mark Ud­all, have cri­ti­cized the meas­ure for not go­ing far enough. The two Demo­crats said they wanted to strengthen the bill to re­quire war­rants for “back­door” searches of Amer­ic­ans’ In­ter­net data that can be in­cid­ent­ally col­lec­ted dur­ing for­eign-sur­veil­lance hauls.

NSA crit­ics have been wait­ing the en­tire year to see Con­gress come to an agree­ment on how to cur­tail the gov­ern­ment’s mass-sur­veil­lance activ­it­ies. In Janu­ary, Pres­id­ent Obama pledged in a ma­jor policy speech to re­form the NSA, but said he could only do so when Con­gress sent him a bill that closely matched his re­com­men­ded changes.

Leahy has in­sisted for weeks that the Sen­ate take up his bill early in the lame duck. “The Amer­ic­an people are won­der­ing wheth­er Con­gress can get any­thing done,” Leahy said Wed­nes­day night, after Re­id filed for clo­ture. “The an­swer is yes. Con­gress can and should take up and pass the bi­par­tis­an USA Free­dom Act, without delay.”

Re­id’s fil­ing was not ex­pec­ted by many sur­veil­lance crit­ics, who had thought the lame-duck ses­sion was too packed with oth­er le­gis­lat­ive agen­das to leave any room for NSA re­form. But grow­ing un­cer­tainty about where the is­sue ranked for Re­pub­lic­ans may have forced Re­id’s hand.

Fur­ther com­plic­at­ing ne­go­ti­ations is the June 2015 sun­set of the post-9/11 Pat­ri­ot Act, the law that grants the gov­ern­ment much of its leg­al au­thor­ity for do­mest­ic sur­veil­lance. It is widely ex­pec­ted that Con­gress would not reau­thor­ize the Pat­ri­ot Act in its cur­rent form.

“That sun­set could very eas­ily touch off an ugly in­tra-party battle among both Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans,” said Har­ley Gei­ger, seni­or coun­sel at the Cen­ter for Demo­cracy & Trans­par­ency, which sup­ports NSA re­form. “Every­one ex­pec­ted it to be ugly.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.