After Calls for His Ouster, Reid Adds New Leaders to Mend Fences

Jon Tester, Elizabeth Warren gain seats at more balanced leadership table.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: (L-R) U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Senate Majority Leader Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), and Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) listen to questions from members of the media after a Democratic Senate leadership election at the U.S. Capitol November 13, 2014 in Washington, DC. Sen. Reid was re-elected as the leader in the election. He also included Sen. Warren, Sen. Tester and Sen. Klobuchar in the new leadership team with new positions. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Nov. 13, 2014, 2:46 p.m.

Sen­ate Demo­crats gathered Thursday morn­ing for what was ex­pec­ted to be a quick meet­ing to reelect their lead­er­ship. What soon-to-be-Minor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id got in­stead was an ear­ful.

Fol­low­ing dif­fi­cult losses in the 2014 midterms that ex­ceeded even the most pess­im­ist­ic Demo­crat­ic pre­dic­tions, sev­er­al mem­bers of the Demo­crat­ic caucus on Thursday called for Re­id to step aside. What was sup­posed to be an un­con­tested lead­er­ship elec­tion-by-af­firm­a­tion turned in­to a four-hour talk­a­thon in which sev­er­al red-state Demo­crats stood up to cri­ti­cize Re­id’s lead­er­ship and the Nevadan moun­ted a strong de­fense of his work.

When the dust settled, long after the new Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity had se­lec­ted its lead­ers, Re­id held onto his po­s­i­tion, but in­vited both a red-state Demo­crat and a lib­er­al li­on­ess in­to the fold, bal­an­cing out his lead­er­ship team in a move that could pla­cate de­tract­ors.

Re­id se­lec­ted Sen. Jon Test­er of Montana to lead the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee and cre­ated a new lead­er­ship po­s­i­tion for Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren of Mas­sachu­setts. The two sen­at­ors rep­res­ent op­pos­ite ends of the party ideo­lo­gic­ally and groups that haven’t al­ways been well-al­lied with Re­id.

On Thursday morn­ing, Sens. Claire Mc­Caskill of Mis­souri and Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia led the fight against Re­id, after in­form­ing the lead­er earli­er in the week that they would op­pose his reelec­tion. The elec­tion was con­duc­ted by secret bal­lot, con­ceal­ing the iden­tit­ies of Re­id’s op­pon­ents, though Mc­Caskill, Manchin, and Sen. Mary Landrieu—who is still caught in an up­hill run­off elec­tion to re­tain her Louisi­ana seat—all copped to vot­ing against Re­id. Neither Manchin nor Mc­Caskill would say how many oth­er mem­bers joined in their move­ment. “There were a num­ber of voices that spoke out; it wasn’t just me,” Mc­Caskill told re­port­ers. “… People came up to me after the meet­ing say­ing, ‘I’m glad some of you said things that needed to be said.’ ” 

Demo­crat­ic losses in 2014 made it clear that the voters want change—not just in their in­di­vidu­al mem­bers, but in the way that the Demo­crat­ic caucus op­er­ates, both Manchin and Mc­Caskill said. “We’ve all had to make changes in our of­fices and had some dif­fi­cult de­cisions to make,” Manchin told re­port­ers. “It can’t be per­son­al. Harry Re­id’s a good man. I just felt—and I was very up-front and for­ward with every­body—I just felt we needed a lead­er­ship change.”

Demo­crat­ic de­tract­ors did not have an al­tern­at­ive choice for lead­er. Manchin said he had asked Re­id to delay the elec­tion for one week so that they could come up with a stand­ard-bear­er, but his re­quest was ig­nored. “This type of an elec­tion, this type of a mo­nu­ment­al switch needs time,” Manchin said after the vote. “And we should dis­cuss it and de­bate it. Harry could’ve made his pitch. If someone else would have come for­ward, we could have had her pitch.”

But Manchin and Mc­Caskill said that re­gard­less of the ef­fic­acy of their nay votes, the con­ver­sa­tion was im­port­ant.

“We need to work harder on mak­ing sure that what we’re do­ing every day is show­ing the Amer­ic­an people that we’re here to work for them and get things done—not to make the oth­er guy look bad, not to score polit­ic­al points, not to be ob­struc­tion­ist, but to get things done for the Amer­ic­an people that they’re hanker­ing to see us do,” Mc­Caskill said. “They want to see us work and do our jobs.”

And the in­clu­sion of Test­er and War­ren in­to the lead­er­ship could help to mend some of the frayed re­la­tion­ships between Re­id’s cur­rent team and the rest of a di­verse caucus.

On the Left, War­ren’s ap­point­ment could ease some fears among lib­er­als in the caucus, which will soon be forced to take a vote on the Key­stone pipeline. Sev­er­al mem­bers on the Left, in­clud­ing Tammy Bald­win of Wis­con­sin, Chris Murphy of Con­necti­c­ut, and in­de­pend­ent Bernie Sanders of Ver­mont, said that they did not blame Re­id for al­low­ing the vote, ac­know­ledging that the bill would come up for a vote soon­er or later giv­en the new Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity.

Non­ethe­less, they and oth­er lib­er­als have strongly signaled their op­pos­i­tion to the meas­ure. Hav­ing War­ren in lead­er­ship could give those mem­bers a stronger voice in the next Con­gress.

For mod­er­ates, Test­er rep­res­ents one of their own. The red-state Demo­crat called Thursday morn­ing’s air­ing of griev­ances a “con­struct­ive con­ver­sa­tion” and said he would “ab­so­lutely” bring his col­leagues’ con­cerns to the lead­er­ship table. “I think there was one mes­sage the voters sent out—a lot of them by not vot­ing—was that we need to work to­geth­er,” he said in a press con­fer­ence, flanked by Re­id, War­ren, and oth­er mem­bers of the Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship.

Asked after the press con­fer­ence about the con­cerns raised in the room, Test­er said: “I think that we’ve got a very tal­en­ted caucus, and those opin­ions that were put for­ward today are, I think, very valu­able if we’re go­ing to be able to win this cycle and next cycle.”

Mc­Caskill said that hav­ing a per­son like Test­er at the lead­er­ship table would be­ne­fit red-state Demo­crats like her­self. “Jon is one of my best friends in the caucus, and he does come from a state like mine in terms of polit­ics, so I think hav­ing him out there as one face of the lead­er­ship is im­port­ant for states that aren’t bright blue,” Mc­Caskill said. “But most im­port­antly, he’s smart, he works in­cred­ibly hard—I mean, this is a guy who goes home and re­pairs his own tract­ors on the week­end. He gets hard work.”

Mc­Caskill also praised War­ren’s ap­point­ment, not­ing: “We do our best work when we hear all dif­fer­ent voices.”

What We're Following See More »
CONCERNED ABOUT A PUBLIC SPECTACLE
Mueller Agrees to Testify, but Only in Private
1 days ago
THE LATEST
FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T BLOCK SUBPOENA OF BANK RECORDS
Trump Loses in Court Again
3 days ago
THE LATEST
SAYS HE CAN'T DO IT WHILE INVESTIGATIONS CONTINUE
Trump Pulls the Plug on Infrastructure
3 days ago
THE LATEST
ADMINISTRATION IS 0-FOR-1 ON STONEWALLING THIS WEEK
Parties Go to Court Today Over Trump Banking Records
3 days ago
THE LATEST
ARRIVAL UNDER "EXTREME SECRECY"
Tillerson Talking to House Foreign Affairs
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was spotted entering a congressional office building on Tuesday morning for what a committee aide told The Daily Beast was a meeting with the leaders of the House Foreign Affairs committee and relevant staff about his time working in the Trump administration. ... Tillerson’s arrival at the Capitol was handled with extreme secrecy. No media advisories or press releases were sent out announcing his appearance. And he took a little noticed route into the building in order to avoid being seen by members of the media."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login