As Flores Wins RSC Race, Tension Simmers Between Leaders and Conservatives

Result fuels dissension, as Mulvaney’s supporters accuse leadership of meddling in contest.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 04: U.S. Rep. Bill Flores (R-TX) calls on the Senate pass the budget that cleared the House last April during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol October 4, 2011 in Washington, DC. Noting that the Senate has not passed a budget in 888 days, Flores and fellow House GOP freshmen put forward their 'Operation Turnaround,' a slate of 12 House-passed bills they say will spur job growth, reduce regulation, shrink the national debt and balance the budget. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
National Journal
Nov. 18, 2014, 7:59 a.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans emerged from their land­slide elec­tion preach­ing unity and un­an­im­ously reelec­ted their top lead­ers last week, but a hotly con­tested race on Tues­day ex­posed per­sist­ing fis­sures in the con­fer­ence between du­el­ing con­ser­vat­ive camps.

Rep. Bill Flores was elec­ted the next chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee, prom­ising a more col­lab­or­at­ive re­la­tion­ship with lead­er­ship but an­ger­ing hard-line con­ser­vat­ives who see the group as the right­ward rud­der of the con­fer­ence, and want it to be more com­bat­ive to that end.

RSC mem­bers elec­ted Flores over Rep. Mick Mul­vaney, who had im­plied Flores would be a shill for lead­er­ship and prom­ised that un­der his own stew­ard­ship, the group could cause prob­lems for Speak­er John Boehner and his team. Flores won on an 84-57 vote on the second bal­lot. The first bal­lot had Flores one vote shy of an out­right vic­tory, with 71 votes to Mul­vaney’s 55 and Louie Gohmert’s 16.

Flores said the de­cid­ing factor was his earn­est and am­ic­able way of dis­agree­ing with lead­er­ship, a con­trast with the brash Mul­vaney, who has at times vo­cally con­tra­dicted House GOP lead­ers, in­clud­ing de­clin­ing to vote for Boehner at the out­set of the 113th Con­gress.

“I haven’t done things pub­licly to hurt con­ser­vat­ives. I have dis­agree­ments with lead­er­ship, I have dis­agree­ments with the speak­er, but I have those one-on-one,” Flores said, after the elec­tion. “I don’t go to the me­dia to do it, I don’t go to the House floor to do it.”

Flores’s ap­proach to deal­ing with lead­er­ship could have a sig­ni­fic­ant im­pact on how ag­gress­ively con­ser­vat­ives push Boehner to con­front the White House on a host of fronts, in­clud­ing next year’s ex­pec­ted battle over rais­ing the debt ceil­ing and the on­go­ing de­bate over im­mig­ra­tion policy. (Flores per­son­ally sup­ports the idea of passing com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form but has said he would not push his own views on the RSC.)

Mul­vaney said after Tues­day’s vote that he was “dis­ap­poin­ted” by his loss. “I am now in the un­com­fort­able po­s­i­tion of hav­ing to write about 80 thank-you notes to the 57 people who voted for me,” he quipped—re­fer­ring to the ap­par­ent in­ac­cur­acy of his whip count—be­fore con­grat­u­lat­ing Flores on his win.

Mem­bers of Mul­vaney’s camp took the news less jovi­ally. Rep. Raul Lab­rador, who un­suc­cess­fully chal­lenged Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy for the lead­er po­s­i­tion earli­er this year, said lead­er­ship meddled in the elec­tion on Flores’s be­half.

“It’s al­ways lead­er­ship, when lead­er­ship gets in­volved in elec­tions,” he said, when asked what was the de­cid­ing factor in the race. “Twist­ing arms.”

When asked wheth­er he and oth­ers would re­nounce their mem­ber­ship in the group, Lab­rador said only, “We’ll see.”

Flores, however, said Lab­rador is ly­ing about lead­er­ship’s in­flu­ence in the race. “That’s not true; that’s a false state­ment,” Flores said. “If they were do­ing it for me I would know about it, but I didn’t know any­thing about it.”

Some RSC mem­bers, in­clud­ing Mul­vaney and his top whip, former RSC Chair­man Jim Jordan, be­came mem­bers of a splinter group called the House Liberty Caucus out of dis­sat­is­fac­tion with what they saw as the more mod­er­ate tack the RSC had taken.

The Liberty Caucus’s founder, Rep. Justin Amash, said after the RSC elec­tion that the res­ult is dis­heart­en­ing and that he does not have much faith in the group.

“I’m dis­ap­poin­ted,” he said. “Our mem­ber­ship has gone up be­cause people have been dis­sat­is­fied with the RSC over the past few years; and I wish Bill Flores all the best, but I’m not per­suaded that the RSC is go­ing to turn in­to the or­gan­iz­a­tion that con­ser­vat­ives ex­pect it to be.”

Flores said he re­cog­nizes that there are hurt feel­ings, but he pre­dicted that things will smooth over in a few days once mem­bers get a chance to see what kind of a lead­er he can be. But he ad­ded that he does not see the RSC’s mis­sion as solely to push lead­er­ship to the right, but rather to ad­voc­ate for spe­cif­ic con­ser­vat­ive policies.

“People are either com­mit­ted to the RSC or they’re not,” he said. “If they’re com­mit­ted to the mis­sion state­ment of the RSC, they’re go­ing to be happy with me as their chair. If they’re com­mit­ted to an­oth­er vis­ion, then they may not be happy with me.”

The res­ult is re­min­is­cent of the last RSC elec­tion, when Rep. Tom Graves was up­set by Rep. Steve Scal­ise. A sim­il­ar dy­nam­ic played out then, with Graves win­ning the en­dorse­ment of move­ment con­ser­vat­ives and Scal­ise, now the ma­jor­ity whip, prom­ising a more col­lab­or­at­ive tone with lead­ers.

But House Re­pub­lic­ans’ chief deputy whip, Rep. Patrick McHenry, said fol­low­ing the vote that Mul­vaney is still an im­port­ant voice in the GOP Con­fer­ence.

“Re­gard­less of what happened with the vote, Mick will be con­sul­ted with. He’s still a force in the con­fer­ence,” McHenry said.

What We're Following See More »
CRITICS CALL RULE "AN INDIRECT WAY TO DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD"
Trump Blocks Federal Funding to Groups that Make Abortion Referrals
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration took aim at Planned Parenthood Friday, issuing a rule barring groups that provide abortions or abortion referrals from participating in the $286 million federal family planning program — a move that is expected to direct millions toward faith-based providers."

Source:
SENATE MUST THEN VOTE ON MEASURE WITHIN 18 DAYS
House Expects Tuesday Vote to End National Emergency
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House plans to vote Tuesday on legislation to formally block President Donald Trump’s attempt to circumvent Congress to fund his border wall, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Friday. The privileged resolution to stop Trump’s emergency declaration — which has 226 co-sponsors, including one Republican — is expected to easily pass the House. It then will be voted in the Senate within 18 days."

Source:
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login