NSA Reform Stalls, Rand Paul Votes No

The defeat marks an abrupt setback for the post-Snowden movement to rein in U.S. spying practices.

The new NSA Data Center on October 8, 2013 in Bluffdale, Utah.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Nov. 18, 2014, 2:43 p.m.

Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans blocked le­gis­la­tion Tues­day that would lim­it the gov­ern­ment’s sweep­ing do­mest­ic spy­ing powers, deal­ing a massive blow to the post-Snowden ef­forts to re­form the U.S. sur­veil­lance state.

At a fi­nal vote of 58 to 42, nearly every Demo­crat and four Re­pub­lic­ans voted for the bill, the USA Free­dom Act, but it failed to clear the 60-vote threshold ne­ces­sary to move for­ward in the up­per cham­ber. Its de­feat al­most cer­tainly means that any re­forms to the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency will have to wait un­til next year, when Re­pub­lic­ans take over the Sen­ate.

The Free­dom Act, which first emerged in Con­gress in the months fol­low­ing former NSA con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden’s leaks last sum­mer, was widely sup­por­ted by the tech in­dustry, pri­vacy and civil-liber­ties ad­voc­ates, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, and even seni­or mem­bers of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity.

But with the coun­try en­gaged in mil­it­ary op­er­a­tions with the Is­lam­ic State in Ir­aq and Syr­ia, a ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans ral­lied against the Free­dom Act. Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, Sen. Marco Ru­bio of Flor­ida, and oth­ers sug­ges­ted the bill could make Amer­ic­ans more vul­ner­able to ter­ror­ist at­tacks.

Sen. Rand Paul, who has long cri­ti­cized the NSA, also voted against the meas­ure. Last week, Paul’s of­fice said the Ken­tucki­an would op­pose the meas­ure be­cause it does not go far enough and would re­new a por­tion of the post-9/11 USA Pat­ri­ot Act, which grants the gov­ern­ment ex­pans­ive spy­ing powers. Back­ers of the Free­dom Act saw Paul as a cru­cial and ne­ces­sary ally to punch the bill through the Sen­ate.

In a state­ment is­sued after the vote, Paul touted his role in pre­vent­ing the bill’s pas­sage.

“Today’s vote to op­pose fur­ther con­sid­er­a­tion of the Pat­ri­ot Act ex­ten­sion proves that we are one step closer to restor­ing civil liber­ties in Amer­ica,” Paul said.

The meas­ure did earn some Re­pub­lic­an sup­port, from Sens. Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Dean Heller, and Lisa Murkowski. Cruz in re­cent weeks had be­come more vo­cal in his cri­ti­cisms of the NSA, which he said has ac­ted with dis­reg­ard of the Con­sti­tu­tion.

Sen. Bill Nel­son of Flor­ida was the lone Demo­crat to vote down the bill.

The meas­ure, au­thored chiefly by Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Patrick Leahy, would ef­fect­ively end the gov­ern­ment’s mass col­lec­tion of metadata—the num­bers and time stamps of phone calls but not their ac­tu­al con­tent. The once-secret prac­tice was the first pro­gram ex­posed by Snowden last sum­mer, which kicked off a tor­rent of dis­clos­ures re­veal­ing the size and scope of the U.S. gov­ern­ment’s broad sur­veil­lance au­thor­ity.

Un­der the bill, phone com­pan­ies such as Ve­r­i­zon would in­stead re­tain those re­cords, which in­tel­li­gence agen­cies could ob­tain only after be­ing gran­ted ap­prov­al from the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court. The bill would also ush­er in a host of ad­di­tion­al pri­vacy and trans­par­ency meas­ures, in­clud­ing a more pre­cise defin­i­tion of what can be con­sidered a sur­veil­lance tar­get.

The House passed its own ver­sion of the bill in May, but last-minute changes caused pri­vacy groups to drop their sup­port for the meas­ure.

The is­sue will have to re­sur­face next year be­cause core pro­vi­sions of the Pat­ri­ot Act are set to ex­pire in June. Pri­vacy ad­voc­ates will lobby for re­stric­tions on the NSA’s powers in any meas­ure to reau­thor­ize the con­tro­ver­sial law. But law­makers may ul­ti­mately back only lim­ited re­forms if the only oth­er op­tion is killing NSA au­thor­it­ies al­to­geth­er.

In Janu­ary, Obama an­nounced that his ad­min­is­tra­tion would re­form the way the NSA col­lects and stores tele­phone metadata of vir­tu­ally all Amer­ic­ans. The pres­id­ent also prom­ised fur­ther trans­par­ency meas­ures and said he wanted to re­store the na­tion’s trust in the gov­ern­ment’s in­tel­li­gence agen­cies.

But Obama also said he could only do so when Con­gress sent him a bill that closely matched his re­com­men­ded changes.

Contributions by Brendan SassoSarah Mimms

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.