How Government—and This Columnist—Failed Flint

Michigan officials poisoned the city’s drinking water, the EPA covered it up, and I took my eye off the ball.

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder delivers his State of the State address in 2015.
AP Photo/Al Goldis
Jan. 19, 2016, 12:13 a.m.

FLINT, Mich.—As I was knock­ing around Flint, a city neg­lected and ul­ti­mately poisoned by every level of gov­ern­ment, my thoughts kept drift­ing to two phrases: “re­fresh­ing ap­proach” and “in noth­ing we trust.”

The first phrase is my de­scrip­tion, in a column last month, of Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder’s lead­er­ship style. What was I think­ing? More on that later.

The second is the head­line on an April 2012 cov­er story I wrote for Na­tion­al Journ­al magazine about a dec­ades-long trend that threatens the na­tion’s soul: the fail­ure of nearly every Amer­ic­an in­sti­tu­tion to ad­apt to rap­id so­cial change and main­tain the pub­lic’s trust. The story was told through the eyes of Johnny Whit­mire, an un­em­ployed con­struc­tion work­er who I met in a Muncie, In­di­ana, court­house. He was fight­ing a $300 fine for fail­ing to cut the lawn of a home he had for­feited to the bank.

Whit­mire is an angry man. He is among a group of voters most skep­tic­al of Pres­id­ent Obama: non­col­lege-edu­cated white males. He feels be­trayed—not just by Obama, who won his vote in 2008, but by the in­sti­tu­tions that were sup­posed to pro­tect him: his state, which laid off his wife; his gov­ern­ment in Wash­ing­ton, which couldn’t res­cue homeown­ers who had played by the rules; his bank, which failed to walk him through the cor­rect pa­per­work or warn him about a po­ten­tial mort­gage hike; his city, which pen­al­ized him for some­body else’s er­ror; and even his em­ploy­er, a con­struc­tion com­pany he likes even though he got laid off.

Tak­ing a break from mow­ing his bank’s weeds, Johnny told me, “You can’t trust any­body or any­thing any­more.”

Flint is a hard-bit­ten in­dus­tri­al town filled with Johnny Whit­mires. People too proud to give up and too poor to mat­ter. People who play by the rules and get played—played by their bosses and banks, their uni­ons and preach­ers; played by small busi­nesses and big me­dia; played by cops and judges and jur­ies; and, of course, played by those damned politi­cians.

The latest in­dig­nity to plague this city of nearly 100,000 is lead pois­on­ing via their drink­ing wa­ter, a man-made dis­aster cre­ated by the ar­rog­ance and in­com­pet­ence of gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials in Flint, Lans­ing, and Wash­ing­ton—Demo­crats as well as Re­pub­lic­ans.

Any­body angry enough to call for GOP Gov. Rick Snyder’s resig­na­tion should also want the scalp of an Obama ap­pointee at the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency who sat on lead test res­ults.

“The EPA bur­ied this,” said Vir­gin­ia Tech re­search­er Marc Ed­wards, whose wa­ter ana­lys­is in 2015 helped ex­pose Flint’s con­tam­in­a­tion.

The tragedy began in April 2014, after the city stopped get­ting its drink­ing wa­ter from the De­troit Wa­ter and Sew­er­age De­part­ment and switched to the re­gion­al Karegnondi Wa­ter Au­thor­ity, which uses Lake Hur­on as a source. There is no pipeline yet built to Flint, so the city used wa­ter from the Flint River as a cost-sav­ing stop­gap.

For months, Flint res­id­ents com­plained about the foul smell and dirty look of their wa­ter, and re­por­ted as­sor­ted health prob­lems. In­de­pend­ent test­ing at Vir­gin­ia Tech showed el­ev­ated levels of lead in the wa­ter in April 2015. Still, noth­ing was done un­til Septem­ber, when re­search­ers at Hur­ley Med­ic­al Cen­ter in Flint re­por­ted that blood tests showed a doub­ling of lead con­tam­in­a­tion in chil­dren young­er than 5.

Chil­dren young­er than 6 are most sus­cept­ible to lead pois­on­ing, ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion, and even low levels can cause per­man­ent brain dam­age.

Who’s to blame? Let’s start at the bot­tom, where the city gov­ern­ment in Flint is so fisc­ally mis­man­aged that Snyder ap­poin­ted a string of emer­gency man­agers who mostly usurped the elec­ted city coun­cil and may­or. (In Michigan, loc­al gov­ern­ments are giv­en power by the state, and that which can be giv­en can also be taken away).

It was a Snyder-ap­poin­ted emer­gency man­ager who made the fate­ful de­cision to switch the city source, one reas­on why Demo­crat­ic crit­ics want the gov­ernor to resign.

Dayne Walling, the Demo­crat­ic may­or at the time of the de­cision, said he feels “be­trayed” by city, state, and fed­er­al of­fi­cials who with­held in­form­a­tion from him. While the emer­gency-man­ager sys­tem dra­mat­ic­ally re­duced his au­thor­ity, Walling said he’s haunted by his fail­ure as a lead­er.

“I think about it every day,” said Walling, who nar­rowly lost reelec­tion last year over the wa­ter crisis. “I wish I would have real­ized that I had to dig deep­er in­to what I was be­ing told—and not be­ing told.”

Hav­ing ap­poin­ted the emer­gency man­ager is only half of Snyder’s prob­lem. His ap­pointees at the state de­part­ments of health and en­vir­on­ment­al qual­ity botched the ex­e­cu­tion of the wa­ter-source switch, vi­ol­at­ing fed­er­al reg­u­la­tions re­quir­ing an­ti­cor­ro­sion treat­ment for the city’s an­cient wa­ter pipes. That lapse caused the lead pois­on­ing, but went un­re­por­ted un­til two non­gov­ern­ment­al watch­dogs—Vir­gin­ia Tech and Hur­ley Med­ic­al Cen­ter—blew the whistle.

Both the dir­ect­or and chief spokes­man of the Michigan De­part­ment of En­vir­on­ment­al Qual­ity were forced to resign, and Snyder has taken sev­er­al steps—al­beit be­latedly—to help Flint identi­fy the ex­tent of the con­tam­in­a­tion and to re­spond to it. He plans to re­veal more ac­tion in Tues­day night’s state of the state ad­dress.

In a wide-ran­ging con­ver­sa­tion with me Monday, Snyder con­ceded that his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s hand­ling of the Flint wa­ter crisis is a stain on his leg­acy, re­flects poorly on his lead­er­ship, and is aptly com­pared to Pres­id­ent Bush’s mis­hand­ling of Hur­ricane Kat­rina. He knows he squandered the pub­lic’s trust. (You can read the full in­ter­view here: “Snyder Con­cedes Flint Is His ‘Kat­rina,’ a Fail­ure of Lead­er­ship.”)

Snyder ac­cep­ted re­spons­ib­il­ity for the lack of ad­equate fol­low-up with his de­part­ment heads, but the twice-elec­ted GOP gov­ernor said he would not heed calls for his resig­na­tion.

“I want to solve this prob­lem,” Snyder said. “I don’t want to walk away from it.”

In Feb­ru­ary 2015, months be­fore Ed­wards helped ex­pose the con­tam­in­a­tion, an EPA wa­ter ex­pert named Miguel Del Tor­al iden­ti­fied po­ten­tial prob­lems in Flint’s drink­ing wa­ter. He con­firmed his sus­pi­cions in April and sum­mar­ized the crisis in a June in­tern­al memo. The memo was kept un­der wraps by EPA Mid­w­est chief Susan Hed­man, and the ana­lyst was for­bid­den from mak­ing his find­ing pub­lic, ac­cord­ing to Ed­wards, who se­cured an em­bar­rass­ing batch of EPA emails via Free­dom of In­form­a­tion Act re­quests.

Hed­man con­cedes that her de­part­ment knew as early as April about the lack of cor­ro­sion con­trol in Flint’s wa­ter sup­ply, but said her hands were tied by in­ter­agency pro­tocol.

“Pro­tocol?” Ed­wards told me. “She bur­ied the memo and gagged the ana­lys­is while kids were be­ing poisoned.”

Even Walling, a Demo­crat like Hed­man, said he doesn’t un­der­stand why some­body at Obama’s EPA didn’t give him a heads-up about Del Tor­al’s find­ing—even off the re­cord—be­fore Walling pub­licly test­i­fied to the wa­ter’s safety, chug­ging a glass of the poisoned li­quid on tele­vi­sion.

He rolled his eyes at Hed­man’s sug­ges­tion that she needed a leg­al opin­ion on wheth­er the EPA could force ac­tion.

“They hid it,” the Demo­crat said. “They knew and used the law as a shield against the truth.”

There is no love lost for Snyder in this largely Demo­crat­ic city, but there is also little doubt that the prob­lems are deep­er than one man or one party. Of all the people I talked to in Flint, nobody ex­pressed the sense of ut­ter be­tray­al bet­ter than Lawrence White, a 43-year-old state em­ploy­ee and own­er of a small se­cur­ity firm. He spent the week­end de­liv­er­ing wa­ter through tears.

“I’m not just singling out Gov­ernor Snyder,” said the Demo­crat, an Afric­an Amer­ic­an. “All the politi­cians in­clud­ing the EPA are play­ing tit-for-tat, play­ing games at our ex­pense. It’s every­body. It’s Re­pub­lic­ans. It’s Demo­crats. It’s a glob­al­iz­a­tion of not caring for the people of Flint.”

Like the story about Johnny Whit­mire, the scan­dal in Flint is a re­mind­er of how gov­ern­ment and oth­er in­sti­tu­tions fail.

—Ar­rog­ant lead­er­ship, with a lack trans­par­ency, fol­low-up, and sin­gu­lar at­ten­tion to mis­sion.

—Lack of power at the bot­tom of so­ci­ety’s bru­tal peck­ing or­der. This would not have happened in a wealthy city like Tra­verse City, Michigan, or Snyder’s ho­met­own of Ann Ar­bor.

—Fi­nally, a lack of over­sight from tra­di­tion­al in­sti­tu­tions. Where was the state le­gis­lature and Con­gress? Where was the me­dia? Why did a sci­ent­ist in Vir­gin­ia crack the case with a FOIA re­quest, rather than an in­vest­ig­at­ive journ­al­ist?

For that mat­ter, why did I write a column about Snyder’s lead­er­ship that didn’t even men­tion Flint? There’s no good an­swer, no ex­cuse. I took my eye off the ball. I blew it.

Now that I’ve caught up, I still think Snyder wants to bring re­fresh­ing change to Michigan polit­ics. Even as he ac­know­ledges a cata­stroph­ic lack of lead­er­ship, I be­lieve he cares about the people he serves. So does Obama, for that mat­ter, and most oth­er politi­cians I know.

That’s what my gut tells me. But can I trust it?

NOTE: Lawrence White’s name was mis­spelled in the ori­gin­al ver­sion of this post.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 days ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
1 days ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
2 days ago

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
2 days ago

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

House Passes Funding Deal
2 days ago

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.