Obama’s Split-Screen Appeal Lost in Ferguson’s Anger

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
James Oliphant
Nov. 24, 2014, 6:02 p.m.

It will be an im­age that may en­dure bey­ond Barack Obama’s ten­ure: The pres­id­ent call­ing for calm on one side of the TV screen; the scene in Fer­guson, Mo. es­cal­at­ing with sirens, smoke, flash gren­ades, and furi­ous res­id­ents on the oth­er.

Obama emerged in­to the White House Brief­ing Room shortly after 10 pm ET, a little more than 90 minutes after pro­sec­utors in St. Louis County an­nounced that a grand jury had voted to not in­dict Of­ficer Dar­ren Wilson in the sum­mer shoot­ing death of Mi­chael Brown.

Even as the pres­id­ent spoke, it felt as if the situ­ation on the ground in Fer­guson was be­gin­ning to spir­al. And view­ers could be for­giv­en for be­com­ing trans­fixed by the pic­tures and tun­ing out Obama’s calls for calm.

Obama was who he usu­ally was: reas­on­able, pro­fess­or­i­al, try­ing to present both sides of the con­tro­versy over Brown’s death. None of it came as a sur­prise; pres­id­ents stand for law and or­der—and this pres­id­ent, mind­ful as al­ways of his unique place in his­tory, walked the line tight­er than most. “We are a na­tion built on the rule of the law,” Obama said. “We need to ac­cept this was a de­cision that was the grand jury’s to make.”

The po­lice, he said, “put their lives on the line for us every single day.”

If any­thing, Obama tried to stay too above the fray, per­haps not giv­ing enough heed to the an­ger ra­ging in Afric­an-Amer­ic­an com­munit­ies in Mis­souri and else­where. At one point, Obama seemed to dis­miss the vi­ol­ent protests as just cable-news-driv­en sen­sa­tion­al­ism, say­ing the tu­mult would “make for good TV.”

But in truth, there was little that Obama, or any­one in his po­s­i­tion, could do. The ten­sion had been build­ing for days—and few on the streets were pay­ing any at­ten­tion to the pres­id­ent. Just minutes after he spoke, there were un­con­firmed re­ports of tear gas be­ing used, of po­lice cars be­ing turned over and burned. That was fol­lowed by loot­ing. Obama had tried to strike a hope­ful, en­cour­aging chord, but it felt al­most too op­tim­ist­ic—and was all but drowned out by the din. He noted that Amer­ic­ans had made “enorm­ous pro­gress in race re­la­tions,” adding that, “I have wit­nessed that in my own life and to deny that pro­gress I think is to deny Amer­ica’s ca­pa­city for change.”

And speak­ing to the ag­grieved in Fer­guson, he said, “But what is also true is that there are still prob­lems and that com­munit­ies of col­or aren’t just mak­ing those prob­lems up.”

It was a per­fect ex­ample of Obama’s on-one-hand-and-on-the-oth­er style, but it also showed his lim­its, both the ones im­posed by his of­fice and the ones he’s im­posed on him­self. Pos­sibly, when the smoke clears Tues­day, his words will gain new res­on­ance. As to wheth­er Obama him­self will travel to Fer­guson to make an­oth­er ap­peal for re­straint, he was non­com­mit­tal.

“Let’s take a look and see how things are go­ing,” he said in re­sponse to a ques­tion. If he was watch­ing tele­vi­sion after his re­marks, he could see that for him­self. And things wer­en’t go­ing very well.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.