Time for a Democratic Reboot? The Party’s House Campaign Chair Doesn’t Think So

DCCC’s Ben Ray Lujan offers a could’ve-been-worse review of the 2014 midterms.

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 11: U.S. Rep. Ben Luján (D-NM) (5th L) speaks as (L-R) Rep. Tony Cardenas (D-CA), Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), and Rep. Rubén Hinojosa (D-TX) listen during a news conference July 11, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus held a news conference to discuss unaccompanied minors crossing the U.S. border. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Dec. 7, 2014, 2:56 p.m.

After an­oth­er dis­ap­point­ing elec­tion for House Demo­crats, one that gave Re­pub­lic­ans their largest ma­jor­ity in al­most a cen­tury, the new chair­man of the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee has a seem­ingly in­con­gru­ous mes­sage: Keep calm and carry on.

DCCC Chair­man Ben Ray Lu­jan is adam­ant, des­pite a 13-seat loss in Novem­ber, that the com­mit­tee has more to build on than to fix. After all, you don’t have to make mis­takes to lose an elec­tion, es­pe­cially in the kind of hor­rible en­vir­on­ment Demo­crats faced this year.

Yet even some fel­low Demo­crats who ac­know­ledge that truth are chaf­ing at the no­tion after be­ing re­leg­ated to a 188-seat minor­ity in the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives.

“You’ll see where some of those shifts are go­ing to take place,” Lu­jan said in an in­ter­view in his new DCCC of­fice. “But I think we really have to take in­to con­sid­er­a­tion that based on some of the mod­el­ing and the na­tion­al mood last cycle “¦ we could have lost 20 or more seats.”

“The team we had in place “¦ kept that to 13,” Lu­jan said. “As we’re mov­ing in­to all of this, that’s something to build off of.”

The com­mit­tee has nu­mer­ous build­ing blocks—its field pro­gram, di­git­al pro­gram, ag­gress­ive re­cruit­ing, and es­pe­cially its strong fun­drais­ing—for 2016 that helped mit­ig­ate Novem­ber’s losses and will po­s­i­tion the party to take ad­vant­age when there is a bet­ter polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment in the fu­ture, Lu­jan said. Un­like the polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment or over­all party mes­saging, those factors are un­der the DCCC’s com­plete con­trol.

But some Demo­crats on and off Cap­it­ol Hill have grown con­cerned since the elec­tion about wheth­er the DCCC is re­act­ing with enough ur­gency to an­oth­er dis­ap­point­ing elec­tion res­ult. Lu­jan’s first move as chair­man was to re­tain Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or Kelly Ward, who echoed the new chair­man’s could’ve-been-worse at­ti­tude in a state­ment when she was re­hired. The Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee has con­vened a “Vic­tory Task Force” to pin­point areas where the party “can strengthen and im­prove op­er­a­tions,” but Lu­jan didn’t of­fer spe­cif­ics on areas where the DCCC could im­prove.

Asked to name one thing he would change at the com­mit­tee after hav­ing some time to re­view things, Lu­jan said, “We want to win more seats.” And, he said, he wants to keep fel­low mem­bers en­gaged with the com­mit­tee.

That’s hardly a re­boot.

“After three cycles of un­der­per­form­ing ex­pect­a­tions, that would seem to high­light the need for new think­ing,” said one Demo­crat­ic con­sult­ant who asked for an­onym­ity to speak freely. (The con­sult­ant com­pared the DCCC’s line to Kev­in Ba­con’s char­ac­ter in An­im­al House, who shouts, “Re­main calm! All is well!” dur­ing the movie’s cli­mactic stam­pede.) “I would think that at some point they’re go­ing to have a prob­lem con­vin­cing donors to give money without res­ults.”

That com­plaint is not uni­ver­sal, though. “I’m frankly amazed at the money they raised and that they didn’t lose more seats,” said Steve El­men­d­orf, a Demo­crat­ic lob­by­ist and donor. “People are al­ways frus­trated when you don’t win, but what do you want to do? “¦ I have not heard any un­der­cur­rent or over­cur­rent of it be­ing the DCCC’s fault or any­thing.”

The DCCC out­raised its Re­pub­lic­an coun­ter­part in both of out­go­ing Chair­man Steve Is­rael’s cycles at the helm, a vir­tu­ally un­pre­ced­en­ted ac­com­plish­ment for the party out of power and one that likely saved seats.

Much of that fund­ing came through the com­mit­tee’s di­git­al de­part­ment, which doubled in size un­der Is­rael and drove the DCCC’s fun­drais­ing, in­clud­ing over 4 mil­lion in­di­vidu­al dona­tions. Also on the di­git­al front, the com­mit­tee spent over $3 mil­lion mes­saging per­suad­able voters on­line in 2014 along with over $67 mil­lion on TV ads.

On the cam­paign side, Lu­jan is re­pris­ing Is­rael’s early re­cruit­ing ef­forts from years past. One of Demo­crats’ los­ing 2014 can­did­ates, Emily Cain of Maine, came to the DCCC Wed­nes­day morn­ing for meet­ings with Lu­jan and oth­er party lead­ers about run­ning for the Demo­crat­ic-lean­ing dis­trict again in 2016. Lu­jan cited dis­tricts Demo­crats lost in Nevada and Iowa, plus a GOP-held open seat in the Phil­adelphia sub­urbs, as top tar­gets on which he’s already fo­cused.

Pres­id­ent Obama car­ried 26 GOP-held dis­tricts when he won reelec­tion in 2012, in­clud­ing the Maine seat that Lu­jan wants Cain to run for again.

And Lu­jan also cited a com­mit­tee field pro­gram—guided this year by an in­tern­al tar­get­ing de­part­ment—that at­temp­ted about 42 mil­lion voter con­tacts in 2014 and re­gistered 80,000 new voters. In some dis­tricts, like Rep.-elect Gwen Gra­ham’s, the num­ber of new DCCC-re­gistered voters was big­ger than the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates’ win­ning mar­gins.

“People don’t dis­miss field, but it’s not something every­body knows how to do well,” said Mary­Anne Pintar, who man­aged Demo­crat­ic Rep. Scott Peters’s reelec­tion cam­paign in San Diego. Peters won by about 6,000 votes. “If you’re a cam­paign man­ager, you are pay­ing at­ten­tion to budget and mail and TV and earned me­dia mes­saging and more, and hav­ing their as­sist­ance and early sup­port on the field end was tre­mend­ous.”

In a postelec­tion con­fer­ence call for House Demo­crats and a sub­sequent caucus meet­ing, both reelec­ted and de­feated mem­bers lined up to voice their sup­port for the DCCC. One of them was Peters, who touted the field pro­gram (as did Reps. Ron Barber, Ami Be­ra, Ju­lia Brown­ley, Eliza­beth Esty, and Rick No­lan), ac­cord­ing to a source in the room at the Nov. 13 caucus meet­ing. Out­go­ing Rep. Car­ol Shea-Port­er said Is­rael and the com­mit­tee he led didn’t de­serve “any of the cri­ti­cism he’s get­ting,” ac­cord­ing to the source. “I lost my dis­trict by 4 points and Jeanne Shaheen lost it too,” Shea-Port­er re­portedly said. “It wasn’t about a move here or a move there.”

But the post-elec­tion call “struck a num­ber of mem­bers as prob­lem­at­ic,” said one House Demo­crat­ic aide. “I think that for a lot of them there was a feel­ing there wasn’t go­ing to be any op­por­tun­ity to have an hon­est dis­cus­sion of what happened in the cycle. The idea that the day after a tough elec­tion was just go­ing to be a lit­any of thank yous, it just didn’t con­nect.”

Still, House Demo­crats didn’t suf­fer the kind of shock­ing losses—like los­ing the Mary­land gubernat­ori­al race—that plagued oth­er arms of their party. A Demo­crat­ic source noted that nearly half of the DCCC’s in­de­pend­ent ex­pendit­ures went in­to races that the party won, in­clud­ing a num­ber of very tight con­tests, des­pite na­tion­al polling show­ing a worse polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment than 2010, by some meas­ures. Lu­jan pledged that the DCCC is “go­ing to be on of­fense” in two years and said “the House is def­in­itely go­ing to be in play in 2016.”

Demo­crats would need to gain 30 seats to re­take the House, a tall or­der that has some in the party won­der­ing if they might need a new round of re­dis­trict­ing or a GOP pres­id­ent as a foil in or­der to take the ma­jor­ity once more. Lu­jan said he’s op­tim­ist­ic that high­er turnout in 2016 will solve some of the party’s prob­lems.

“We need more people vot­ing,” Lu­jan said. “We saw turnout across the coun­try at the low­est it’s been in a long, long time, so the more we can get people ex­cited about get­ting to the polls, which hap­pens in pres­id­en­tial elec­tion years, is something I’m look­ing for­ward to and why I think we’ll be on of­fense in­stead of de­fense.”

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login