Jeb Bush Is Dismissing the GOP Base at His Own Peril

Republican voters aren’t looking for reforms. They want to cut the size of government.

National Journal
Dec. 16, 2014, 3:28 p.m.

Six months after Pres­id­ent Obama’s 2008 land­slide vic­tory swept Demo­crats in­to power across the coun­try, Jeb Bush, Mitt Rom­ney, and Eric Can­tor sat down at a sub­urb­an Wash­ing­ton pizzer­ia to talk policy. They spent that May week­end ar­guing that the GOP’s best path back in­to power was to im­prove the party’s battered im­age by ad­voc­at­ing re­forms for edu­ca­tion, im­mig­ra­tion, and the eco­nomy. Can­tor saw the ses­sion as a rebrand­ing ex­er­cise, of­fer­ing mostly plat­it­udes about hav­ing a con­ver­sa­tion with the Amer­ic­an people. Rom­ney used the event as early pre­par­a­tion for his second pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, mostly stick­ing to talk­ing points. But Jeb Bush came pre­pared with a slew of cre­at­ive pro­pos­als to test out at the town hall, like char­ging lower tu­ition to stu­dents pur­su­ing high-end de­grees in en­gin­eer­ing and sci­ence.

After the event ended, sev­er­al re­port­ers (my­self in­cluded) chased after Bush to ask him the in­ev­it­able ques­tions about his in­terest in run­ning for pres­id­ent. He was vis­ibly an­noyed, lament­ing that Wash­ing­ton re­port­ers only ask about the polit­ic­al horse race and have no in­terest in policy.

With Bush’s an­nounce­ment Tues­day that he’s form­ing an ex­plor­at­ory com­mit­tee for pres­id­ent, he’ll be test­ing the pro­pos­i­tion that be­ing a policy wonk sells polit­ic­ally. In dis­cuss­ing pre­par­a­tions for a run this week, Bush con­fid­ently de­clared he wouldn’t pander to Re­pub­lic­an voters, stick­ing to his prin­ciples on im­mig­ra­tion and edu­ca­tion re­form. In prin­ciple, the ar­gu­ment is re­fresh­ing. In prac­tice, however, it ig­nores polit­ic­al real­ity.

The or­gan­iz­a­tion that Can­tor launched (the Na­tion­al Coun­cil for Amer­ica) nev­er got off the ground des­pite the hype. Re­pub­lic­ans won back con­trol of Con­gress simply by run­ning against an un­pop­u­lar pres­id­ent, not by of­fer­ing a set of solu­tions to fix the coun­try’s strug­gling eco­nomy. Des­pite be­ing House ma­jor­ity lead­er, Can­tor lost his primary to an ob­scure op­pon­ent—in part be­cause he over­es­tim­ated the polit­ic­al re­ward of pitch­ing lofty re­forms and ig­nored the day-to-day dis­sat­is­fac­tion from his own con­stitu­ents. In his second pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, Rom­ney struggled to lock up the nom­in­a­tion against a deeply con­ser­vat­ive field and was un­able to cap­it­al­ize on Obama’s me­diocre ap­prov­al rat­ings.

Oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans have talked in high-minded fash­ion about selling con­ser­vat­ive re­forms to GOP voters, but found there wasn’t much polit­ic­al be­ne­fit in do­ing so. New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie be­came fam­ous for his tough talk against waste­ful gov­ern­ment and teach­ers uni­ons in his first term, but has all but aban­doned ad­voc­at­ing new ideas since cam­paign­ing for reelec­tion. Lately, the fam­ously out­spoken gov­ernor has avoided policy ques­tions on im­mig­ra­tion (des­pite trav­el­ing in Mex­ico!) and on the Sen­ate re­port on the CIA’s in­ter­rog­a­tion tech­niques. Louisi­ana Gov. Bobby Jin­dal has got­ten little polit­ic­al trac­tion pro­mot­ing re­forms on health care, en­ergy, edu­ca­tion, and na­tion­al se­cur­ity, and he’s care­ful to frame his ideas in op­pos­i­tion to Obama. Once a sup­port­er of the Com­mon Core edu­ca­tion­al stand­ards that Jeb Bush cham­pi­ons, Jin­dal now com­pares them to So­viet cent­ral plan­ning.

Sen. Marco Ru­bio of Flor­ida, a Jeb Bush aco­lyte who is mulling a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign of his own, learned firsthand the polit­ic­al risk in em­bra­cing change. By cham­pi­on­ing com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form, Ru­bio ali­en­ated much of the con­ser­vat­ive base and got side­tracked from oth­er is­sues that could also broaden the party’s ap­peal. Bush is an equally en­thu­si­ast­ic pro­ponent of im­mig­ra­tion re­form, but un­like Ru­bio, he plans to con­tin­ue push­ing it in a GOP primary. Ru­bio re­spon­ded this year by de­liv­er­ing a series of speeches centered on eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­ity, but now Bush’s planned can­did­acy puts a crimp in his path to the nom­in­a­tion.

Can­did­ates want to be seen as hav­ing a de­tailed blue­print on how to get the coun­try back on track, but it’s those very de­tails that lead to un­in­ten­ded con­sequences. Re­pub­lic­an of­fi­cials con­fid­ently pro­moted com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form as a sure­fire way to im­prove the party’s stand­ing with His­pan­ics, but blow­back from the base and res­ist­ance from the pub­lic tempered the en­thu­si­asm. The polit­ic­al be­ne­fits of court­ing His­pan­ics was off­set by the risk of ali­en­at­ing the GOP’s base of work­ing-class whites.

Edu­ca­tion re­form is a rare is­sue that unites ele­ments of the Demo­crat­ic and Re­pub­lic­an parties, but the de­tails of im­prov­ing ac­count­ab­il­ity spark in­tense op­pos­i­tion. Some con­ser­vat­ives op­pose any top-down re­forms em­an­at­ing from Wash­ing­ton, while some lib­er­als res­ist a one-size-fits-all sys­tem ham­stringing teach­er cre­ativ­ity. Not to men­tion that the sprawl­ing edu­ca­tion­al bur­eau­cracy, the tar­get of many re­forms, is a re­li­able source of em­ploy­ment.

Cut­ting en­ti­tle­ments to bal­ance the budget is an­oth­er is­sue that is em­braced by gov­ern­ment re­formers, but is very hard to win sup­port for polit­ic­ally. Polls show that even the most con­ser­vat­ive voters op­pose cut­ting So­cial Se­cur­ity or Medi­care be­ne­fits. Rom­ney’s choice of Paul Ry­an as his run­ning mate was in­ten­ded to send the mes­sage that he was com­mit­ted to mak­ing the tough choices to get the coun­try’s eco­nomy back on track. In real­ity, in­clud­ing one of the GOP’s most re­spec­ted fisc­al re­formers car­ried little be­ne­fit for the Re­pub­lic­an tick­et.

Last week, Bush said that to make a cam­paign suc­cess­ful, he must “lose the primary to win the gen­er­al.” But it’s im­port­ant for him to make it clear­er that he’s cri­ti­ciz­ing the primary pro­cess, yet not dis­miss­ing the Re­pub­lic­an Party’s voters. A ma­jor­ity of the GOP elect­or­ate is in­her­ently skep­tic­al of gov­ern­ment’s abil­ity to do good, even when it’s used to pro­mote mar­ket-based re­forms. Those feel­ings have in­tens­i­fied un­der Obama, who has ag­gress­ively ex­pan­ded gov­ern­ment’s reach and re­lied on ex­ec­ut­ive or­ders as a sub­sti­tute for work­ing with Con­gress to pass le­gis­la­tion. Obama’s ad­min­is­tra­tion is filled with tech­no­crats who con­fid­ently be­lieve they’re smarter than the av­er­age Amer­ic­an.

Bush is something of a con­ser­vat­ive tech­no­crat him­self, fo­cus­ing his ef­forts on fig­ur­ing out how to make gov­ern­ment work most ef­fect­ively—not on cut­ting it down to size. He’d prob­ably find com­mon ground with lib­er­al former San Fran­cisco May­or Gav­in New­s­om, whose book Cit­izen­ville ar­gued that in or­der for Demo­crats to make the case for a more act­iv­ist gov­ern­ment, they needed to in­nov­ate from with­in first.

But that’s not how many Re­pub­lic­an voters feel, and it goes well bey­ond the tea-party wing of the party. In Septem­ber, Gal­lup found that only 41 per­cent of re­spond­ents thought that “gov­ern­ment should do more to solve the coun­try’s prob­lems.” Bush can’t af­ford to simply dis­miss the con­ser­vat­ive crit­ics and run a gen­er­al-elec­tion strategy from the out­set. He’ll need to ag­gress­ively win the de­bate from with­in.

What We're Following See More »
House Intel Postpones Testimony by Felix Sater
2 hours ago
McConnell Blocks Vote on Making Mueller Report Public
3 hours ago
Michael Avenatti Charged with Extortion
5 hours ago

"Michael Avenatti, the attorney who shot to national fame for representing adult film actress Stormy Daniels in her case against President Donald Trump, was arrested Monday in two separate cases of alleged financial crimes on both coasts.New York prosecutors accused Avenatti of attempting to extract more than $20 million from Nike Inc. by threatening to inflict financial and reputational harm on the company. Avenatti, a frequent attacker of Trump who flirted with a 2020 presidential bid, is also facing separate bank and wire fraud charges in Los Angeles, authorities said."

Barr to Testify Before House April 9
7 hours ago
FHA Tightening Rules for First-Time Homebuyers
7 hours ago

"The federal agency that insures mortgages for first-time home buyers is tightening its standards, concerned it is allowing too many risky loans to be extended. The Federal Housing Administration told lenders this month it would begin flagging more loans as high risk. Those mortgages, many of which are extended to borrowers with low credit scores and high loan payments relative to their incomes, will now go through a more rigorous manual underwriting process, the FHA said."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.