This Is What Functioning Government Looks Like

After an embarrassing start, public-private sector leaders get their acts together on Ebola.

Jan. 6, 2015, 6:09 a.m.

When the first per­son dia­gnosed with Ebola on U.S. soil died in Oc­to­ber, I sug­ges­ted there was something scar­i­er than the pro­spect of an out­break. More alarm­ing than a Texas hos­pit­al’s mis­dia­gnos­is of Thomas Duncan. More threat­en­ing than a bur­eau­crat­ic snafu at the state health de­part­ment that delayed san­it­iz­a­tion of Duncan’s apart­ment. More wor­ri­some than the slug­gish pace of U.S. aid to West Africa, ground zero for the vir­us.

Of all the reas­ons to get hys­ter­ic­al about Ebola, what con­cerned me most was the so­cial pre­ced­ent. The ini­tial re­sponse re­minded Amer­ic­ans of the lim­its of crit­ic­al U.S. in­sti­tu­tions—in this case, vari­ous state, loc­al, and fed­er­al agen­cies and private-sec­tor health sys­tems that re­spon­ded to Duncan’s ill­ness slowly, in­ef­fi­ciently, and with a lack of candor that Amer­ic­ans, un­for­tu­nately, have come to ex­pect.

In short, the United States faces crises of lead­er­ship and trust. Which, to me, is the scar­i­est thing about the Ebola out­break. I’m far less wor­ried about the dis­ease strik­ing me or my loved ones than I am about what this in­cid­ent says about the na­tion’s abil­ity to sur­vive a true cata­clysm. Wheth­er the next ex­ist­en­tial event is Ebola or IS­IS or any of the count­less 21st-cen­tury hor­rors, we are only as strong as our in­sti­tu­tions—and our trust in them.

Since I wrote that column on Oct. 4, the in­sti­tu­tions ral­lied. Our lead­ers got their acts to­geth­er. Pres­id­ent Obama and con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans, along with the pub­lic and private health sec­tors, de­serve cred­it for pos­it­ive steps taken since the Ebola crisis’s un­ac­cept­able start.

Two health care work­ers in­fec­ted by Duncan re­covered. Sev­en oth­er Amer­ic­ans were in­fec­ted with Ebola—all over­seas, and all but one re­covered. Most fam­ously, Dr. Craig Spen­cer fell ill after re­turn­ing from work­ing for Doc­tors Without Bor­ders in Guinea. While in­fec­ted, he used the New York sub­way and a car ser­vice, and went bowl­ing—all without trans­mit­ting the dis­ease. He is fully re­covered.

“Our best ex­perts thought that high-qual­ity health care could treat Ebola, but didn’t really know be­cause Ebola had nev­er been here be­fore,” said Ron Klain who was ap­poin­ted in the fall to be Obama’s so-called Ebola czar. Sit­ting in his of­fice over­look­ing the West Wing, Klain ticked off the ac­com­plish­ments of a co­ordin­ated pub­lic-private sec­tor at­tack.

  • “The num­ber of U.S. hos­pit­als cer­ti­fied to treat Ebola in­creased from three to 44.
  • “The num­ber of labs that can test for Ebola in­creased from 14 to 42.”
  • “The first-ever Ebola vac­cine com­pleted first-stage tri­als in Decem­ber, and 20,000 doses will be ad­min­istered in Africa in just weeks.”
  • A vol­un­tary self-mon­it­or­ing sys­tem for trav­el­ers was re­placed with an “act­ive mon­it­or­ing sys­tem” that routes any­one trav­el­ing from West Africa to one of five U.S. air­ports, where they are screened and giv­en a pre­pro­grammed cell phone with num­bers to call if they get ill. Each per­son is tracked by a state pub­lic health de­part­ment for 21 days. Trav­el­ers ex­posed to the vir­us get their tem­per­at­ure checked twice daily. Klain gets a daily up­date. On Monday, data were re­cor­ded on 98.9 per­cent of the people be­ing tracked.”
  • Con­gress took just five weeks to pass a $5.4 bil­lion pack­age aimed at pre­vent­ing fur­ther out­breaks. While the White House had asked for $6.2 bil­lion, Obama signed the bill, and Klain said the GOP made “reas­on­able changes.”“
  • In Liber­ia, Ebola treat­ment units were built by the United States on time, and the num­ber of news cases has dropped from about 100 per day to five or 10 per day. For all of West Africa, the epi­dem­ic is still rampant, al­though Klain said the num­ber of cases is be­low fore­cast

“The point here isn’t that the re­sponse has been per­fect,” Klain said. He noted that a lab er­ror at the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion in At­lanta may have ex­posed a tech­ni­cian to Ebola. In West Africa, Si­erra Le­one, and Guinea steep chal­lenges re­main. “But I think it is the case that the Ebola re­sponse has been co­ordin­ated, ef­fect­ive, and shown real res­ults.”

Klain said Obama de­serves cred­it for ig­nor­ing the clam­or for a West Afric­an quar­ant­ine, a step that might have helped the White House polit­ic­ally but that sci­ent­ists said would have made it harder to fight Ebola at its roots.

He also praised con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans, par­tic­u­larly out­go­ing Rep. Jack King­ston of Geor­gia, who chaired the Ap­pro­pri­ations Sub­com­mit­tee that over­sees health care fund­ing. After los­ing is Sen­ate bid, King­ston helped steer the aid bill through the House while a lame duck. “He bus­ted his butt,” Klain said.

Fi­nally, Klain said the pub­lic and private health care sys­tems de­serve huge praise for treat­ing and con­tain­ing Ebola. “They took up the chal­lenge very ag­gress­ively,” he said.

Policy ahead of polit­ics? Bi­par­tis­an­ship? Com­pet­ent bur­eau­cra­cies? Klain at­trib­uted the Ebola re­bound to “the clas­sic Amer­ic­an at­ti­tude of people hold­ing up their hands and say­ing, ‘I’m will­ing to do it.’ “

The in­sti­tu­tion faring worst in all of this may be mine: The me­dia, which seems to flit from crisis to crisis like a moth against a well-lit win­dow, con­vert­ing fear in­to rat­ings and page-views.

Nu­mer­ous polls show the me­dia lead­ing an un­healthy trend: Stead­ily, over the past four dec­ades, the na­tion has lost faith in vir­tu­ally every in­sti­tu­tion that is key to a func­tion­al so­ci­ety: banks, school, col­leges, char­it­ies, uni­ons, po­lice de­part­ments, or­gan­ized re­li­gion, big and small busi­ness, and, of course, polit­ics and gov­ern­ment.

While no single event will re­verse or even nudge the trend, on Ebola — of late, any­how — U.S. lead­ers seem worthy of our trust.

What We're Following See More »
Pelosi Pushing Legislation to End National Emergency
9 hours ago

"Speaker Nancy Pelosi is throwing her muscle behind a legislative effort to block President Donald Trump’s national emergency declaration, the first formal step to counter Trump and squeeze Republicans on the border wall. Democrats will introduce legislation Friday to terminate the emergency proclamation and Pelosi is urging House colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support the resolution, according to a letter obtained by POLITICO on Wednesday."

Cohen Testifying at House Oversight Feb. 27
11 hours ago
Trump Signs Border Deal
5 days ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
5 days ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
5 days ago

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.