GOP Knives Come Out Against US-China Carbon Pact, Paris Climate Talks

A day after President Obama touted the deal with China on Capitol Hill, a Senate amendment would declare it null and void.

Sen. James Inhofe
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
Jan. 21, 2015, 7:49 a.m.

Two prom­in­ent Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans have launched a polit­ic­al as­sault on Pres­id­ent Obama’s re­cent cli­mate pact with China, an ef­fort that ar­rives the morn­ing after Obama high­lighted the deal in his State of the Uni­on speech.

Sens. Roy Blunt and James In­hofe on Wed­nes­day floated a “sense of the Sen­ate” amend­ment to Key­stone pipeline le­gis­la­tion de­clar­ing that the pact reached in Novem­ber has “no force and ef­fect” in the U.S.

White House of­fi­cials say the bi­lat­er­al agree­ment is provid­ing mo­mentum for wider glob­al cli­mate talks. “[B]ecause the world’s two largest eco­nom­ies came to­geth­er, oth­er na­tions are now step­ping up and of­fer­ing hope that this year the world will fi­nally reach an agree­ment to pro­tect the one plan­et we’ve got,” Obama said in his speech Tues­day night.

The new GOP amend­ment fore­shad­ows a fight over the cli­mate ac­cord that dip­lo­mats hope to reach at make-or-break United Na­tions talks in Par­is late this year.

The non­bind­ing Sen­ate meas­ure says that both the U.S.-China pact and U.S. agree­ment with the hoped-for Par­is deal would re­quire Sen­ate ap­prov­al.

The emer­ging ar­chi­tec­ture of the in­ter­na­tion­al cli­mate pact that ne­go­ti­at­ors plan to com­plete in Par­is would stop short of a form­al new treaty that re­quires Sen­ate sign-off, which is a near-im­possible pro­spect.

Blunt bashed the U.S.-China deal on the Sen­ate floor Wed­nes­day. “We think this is a bad deal, Sen­at­or In­hofe and I, and I think many oth­ers will join us. A bad deal for our coun­try, it’s eco­nom­ic­ally un­fair, it is en­vir­on­ment­ally ir­re­spons­ible,” said Blunt, who is vice chair­man of the Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence. In­hofe heads the Sen­ate’s En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee.

China, the world’s largest green­house-gas emit­ter, agreed to a peak in its soar­ing car­bon emis­sions in 2030 at the latest, and also vowed to sharply in­crease use of car­bon-free fuels to reach 20 per­cent of its en­ergy con­sump­tion by 2030.

The U.S., the world’s second-biggest pol­luter, pledged to cut green­house-gas emis­sions by 26-28 per­cent be­low 2005 levels by 2025, build­ing on the ex­ist­ing tar­get of a 17 per­cent cut by 2020. Obama and Chinese Pres­id­ent Xi Jin­ping an­nounced the plan in Beijing in Novem­ber after months of quiet, high-level talks between the na­tions.

“In Beijing, we made a his­tor­ic an­nounce­ment: The United States will double the pace at which we cut car­bon pol­lu­tion. And China com­mit­ted, for the first time, to lim­it­ing their emis­sions,” Obama said in the State of the Uni­on ad­dress.

Blunt said he wants a vote on the plan, but law­makers from both parties have filed dozens of amend­ments to le­gis­la­tion to ap­prove the Key­stone XL pipeline, and its not clear which meas­ures will ul­ti­mately re­ceive votes.

The amend­ment calls the U.S.-China cli­mate plan a raw deal for the U.S. that will boost power prices and hinder man­u­fac­tur­ing and oth­er in­dus­tries, while China’s emis­sions are al­lowed to con­tin­ue rising for years to come.

But U.S. of­fi­cials say the deal will re­quire China to take near-term steps to en­sure the sweep­ing trans­form­a­tion of its en­ergy sec­tor pledged un­der the agree­ment.

“To meet its goal, China will need to de­ploy an ad­di­tion­al 800 to 1,000 gigawatts of nuc­le­ar, wind, sol­ar, and oth­er re­new­able gen­er­a­tion ca­pa­city by 2030 — an enorm­ous amount, about the same as all the coal-fired power plants in China today, and nearly as much as the total elec­tri­city gen­er­a­tion ca­pa­city of the United States,” Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry said in a Novem­ber op-ed tout­ing the pact.

What We're Following See More »
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
4 hours ago

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Senate Votes To Fund Government
1 days ago
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.