Obama’s Oil Complex

The administration plans to open East Coast waters to future drilling even as it toughens protections in Alaska.

National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
Jan. 26, 2015, 2:39 p.m.

When it comes to oil drilling and en­vir­on­ment­al re­stric­tions, the White House is all over the map this week — lit­er­ally.

Pres­id­ent Obama on Sunday said he wants to per­man­ently de­clare more than 12 mil­lion acres of Alaska’s Arc­tic Na­tion­al Wild­life Refuge as wil­der­ness, block­ing oil and gas de­vel­op­ment in the coastal plain of the refuge that the state and oil com­pan­ies have long coveted for drilling.

But Obama’s In­teri­or De­part­ment is also set to pro­pose al­low­ing new off­shore drilling in the At­lantic Ocean, which is cur­rently off-lim­its to de­vel­op­ment, mul­tiple sources tell Na­tion­al Journ­al. The draft plan could be an­nounced as soon as Tues­day, and it’s ex­pec­ted to in­clude leas­ing off the coasts of North and South Car­o­lina, and Vir­gin­ia.

The same plan, a sched­ule of oil-and-gas drilling lease auc­tions between 2017 and 2022, will also pro­pose new re­stric­tions against ex­plor­a­tion in Arc­tic wa­ters off the Alaska coast­line, ac­cord­ing to the of­fice of Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

For the White House, the suite of policy de­cisions re­flects a polit­ic­ally com­plic­ated re­la­tion­ship with do­mest­ic oil de­vel­op­ment, and it will in­vite sep­ar­ate battles with both Re­pub­lic­ans and green act­iv­ists.

En­ergy con­sult­ant Kev­in Book says Obama’s over­all en­ergy policy, not just oil and gas, is “give a little, take a little.” He points out reg­u­lat­ory re­stric­tions on moun­tain­top coal min­ing in Ap­palachia, while reg­u­lat­ors haven’t gone after West­ern states’ coal pro­duc­tion.

When it comes to oil and gas spe­cific­ally, Book sees a “green­ing up,” point­ing to re­cent policies such as planned meth­ane pol­lu­tion reg­u­la­tions. “It seems like in the fi­nal two years there may be more take than give when it comes to oil and gas,” said Book, the man­aging dir­ect­or of Clear­View En­ergy Part­ners.

En­vir­on­ment­al­ists, since early in Obama’s first term, have used closed-door meet­ings with White House of­fi­cials and pub­lic ad­vocacy to press for new pro­tec­tions for the Arc­tic, in­clud­ing the refuge. Drilling isn’t al­lowed in AN­WR now, and it would take an act of Con­gress and a sup­port­ive pres­id­ent to ap­prove it, but green groups want even firmer pro­tec­tions.

At the same time, the ad­min­is­tra­tion has for years been ap­plaud­ing the surge in do­mest­ic oil pro­duc­tion, which, while largely on state and private lands, hasn’t stopped Obama from re­mind­ing voters it has oc­curred on his watch.

Obama has pushed for At­lantic Coast leas­ing be­fore. In late March 2010, he gave a speech an­noun­cing an In­teri­or lease sale plan that would open areas in the mid- and south At­lantic to drilling. Long-stand­ing con­gres­sion­al bans had fallen apart in 2008 amid soar­ing oil prices.

But just three weeks after the an­nounce­ment, the Deep­wa­ter Ho­ri­zon drilling rig blew up in the Gulf of Mex­ico, claim­ing 11 lives and touch­ing off the worst oil spill in U.S. his­tory. The White House backed off, and the plan kept the At­lantic off-lim­its even though the le­gis­lat­ive morator­i­ums were gone.

Obama’s AN­WR pro­pos­al is also a throw­back of sorts, put­ting the long-sim­mer­ing, emo­tion­al battle over the refuge back in the polit­ic­al spot­light.

Murkowski, who strongly fa­vors de­vel­op­ment, spoke per­son­ally with In­teri­or Sec­ret­ary Sally Jew­ell on Fri­day even­ing after meet­ing with a top In­teri­or aide about vari­ous Alaska policies earli­er in the day, spokes­man Robert Dillon said. Murkowski is furi­ous over the White House ef­forts on AN­WR, off­shore drilling, and oth­er policies she calls a “stun­ning at­tack” on her state’s sov­er­eignty.

“I have tried to work with this ad­min­is­tra­tion — even though they’ve made it ex­tremely dif­fi­cult every step of the way — but those days are of­fi­cially over. We are left with no choice but to hit back as hard as we can,” said Murkowski, the chair­wo­man of the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee and the sub­pan­el of the Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee that over­sees In­teri­or’s budget.

Ac­cord­ing to Murkowski’s of­fice, the 2017-2022 plan will put wide swaths of Arc­tic wa­ters off Alaska’s coast off lim­its. A num­ber of en­ergy com­pan­ies already hold leases in por­tions of the Beaufort and Chuk­chi seas, and Murkowski’s of­fice said they’re con­cerned that while those leases are pro­tec­ted, new re­stric­tions nearby could make de­vel­op­ing them more dif­fi­cult.

Wil­der­ness pro­tec­tion was not a big fo­cus for the White House dur­ing Obama’s first term, but the ad­min­is­tra­tion has got­ten far more ag­gress­ive in the second by des­ig­nat­ing a series of ma­jor new na­tion­al monu­ments.

But Obama doesn’t have the same power to per­man­ently keep AN­WR off-lim­its to drilling without Con­gress, and the chances of con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al of Obama’s wil­der­ness pitch are re­mote.

In most re­spects, In­teri­or’s new con­ser­va­tion plan an­nounced Sunday changes little be­cause the area is already off-lim­its to rigs, but act­iv­ists were non­ethe­less de­lighted by what they say is now a form­al pro-pro­tec­tion stance by In­teri­or reg­u­lat­ors.

Ac­cord­ing to In­teri­or, it’s the first time the de­part­ment has taken a form­al po­s­i­tion on AN­WR man­age­ment since 1987, when the Re­agan ad­min­is­tra­tion urged Con­gress to open it up for drilling.

“This is the first pro­act­ive con­ser­va­tion step on the refuge in a really long time,” said Kristen Miller, con­ser­va­tion dir­ect­or for the Alaska Wil­der­ness League. “This is an amaz­ing step.”

But while he’s draw­ing cheers from his green base on AN­WR, Obama will face op­pos­i­tion from en­vir­on­ment­al­ists by in­clud­ing At­lantic Coast wa­ters in the new off­shore leas­ing plan.

Claire Dou­glass, the cam­paign dir­ect­or for cli­mate and en­ergy with the group Oceana, said the or­gan­iz­a­tion is work­ing with oth­er en­vir­on­ment­al groups and loc­al com­munit­ies to push back. She called oil-and-gas leas­ing a threat to coastal in­dus­tries such as tour­ism and fish­ing.

“We ex­pect it in the draft; however, we are con­fid­ent that the ad­min­is­tra­tion will do the right thing and listen to the loc­al op­pos­i­tion and take out the At­lantic from the fi­nal pro­gram,” Dou­glass said in an in­ter­view.

This story has been up­dated.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
20 hours ago

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
21 hours ago

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
21 hours ago

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."