Boehner to Sue Obama, Again

The speaker is planning to hold a House vote authorizing a suit against the president over his executive orders on immigration.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Daniel Newhauser
Jan. 27, 2015, 6:11 a.m.

Speak­er John Boehner is fi­nal­iz­ing a plan to sue Pres­id­ent Obama again, this time over the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­cision to grant work visas to mil­lions of un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants.

Boehner told his con­fer­ence at a closed-door meet­ing Tues­day morn­ing that he has a team ex­plor­ing the best op­tions to chal­lenge last year’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion, un­der which the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment will be­gin grant­ing leg­al work­ing status to mil­lions of im­mig­rants, ac­cord­ing to sources in the room.

“Our team has been work­ing on lit­ig­a­tion. We are fi­nal­iz­ing a plan to au­thor­ize lit­ig­a­tion on this is­sue — one we be­lieve gives us the best chance of suc­cess,” he said, ac­cord­ing to a source in the room.

The move to­ward a law­suit comes as the GOP’s le­gis­lat­ive op­tions to tar­get the pres­id­ent’s policies are wan­ing. The House passed a bill fund­ing DHS that con­tained pro­vi­sions rolling back Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion and oth­er ad­min­is­trat­ive re­lax­a­tions of im­mig­ra­tion en­force­ment, in­clud­ing de­ferred ac­tion for child­hood ar­rivals, oth­er­wise known as Dream­ers. But the bill faces an un­cer­tain fu­ture in the Sen­ate, where the im­mig­ra­tion-re­lated meas­ures are thought not to have the re­quis­ite Demo­crat­ic sup­port to ex­ceed the 60-vote fili­buster threshold.

If the bill comes back to the House with less-strin­gent meas­ures tar­get­ing the White House’s im­mig­ra­tion policy — or, in­deed, none at all — it is un­clear that it can pass the cham­ber. So chal­len­ging the pres­id­ent in ven­ue oth­er than the Cap­it­ol could as­suage GOP House mem­bers who have said un­equi­voc­ally that they do not want to move any oth­er im­mig­ra­tion meas­ures un­til the pres­id­ent’s ac­tions are dealt with.

It is un­clear wheth­er a con­gres­sion­al law­suit would also chal­lenge the de­ferred ac­tion for child­hood ar­rivals policy, which has already put off de­port­a­tion for more than a half- mil­lion un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants. The House would have to vote on a res­ol­u­tion au­thor­iz­ing leg­al ac­tion, and that could come in the form of its own law­suit, or in the form of join­ing an ex­ist­ing suit chal­len­ging Obama’s ac­tions.

Boehner’s com­ments come a day after GOP lead­ers de­cided to pull a bor­der-se­cur­ity meas­ure from House con­sid­er­a­tion. Lead­er­ship aides said the snowy weath­er and a short le­gis­lat­ive week were to blame, but the meas­ure faced prob­lems of its own, namely from some con­ser­vat­ives who think it does not go far enough to shore up in­teri­or en­force­ment.

At a press con­fer­ence Tues­day, Boehner ac­know­ledged that out­stand­ing is­sues need to be dealt with, ones that are bey­ond the Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee’s jur­is­dic­tion.

“We’re go­ing to have to walk through all of this with our mem­bers,” he said, “and when we’re ready to move, we will.”

A new group of about 30 House con­ser­vat­ives named the House Free­dom Caucus met Monday night, and the near-un­an­im­ous sen­ti­ment in the private meet­ing was that any bor­der-se­cur­ity bill should not be moved without a com­pan­ion bill that shores up en­force­ment with­in the na­tion’s bor­ders. Oth­ers still said that no im­mig­ra­tion bills should be rushed to the floor un­til there is some fi­nal­ity on wheth­er the pending DHS bill can block Obama’s ac­tions, mean­ing a bill would not come un­til March. Fund­ing for DHS runs out Feb. 27.

“There’s a grow­ing body of people that are sick and tired of the, ‘Trust me, we’ll do it later ap­proach’ and want us to deal with both in­teri­or en­force­ment and bor­der se­cur­ity at the same time,” said Rep. Matt Sal­mon, a House Free­dom Caucus found­ing mem­ber.

Ul­ti­mately, though, Rep. Tom Cole, a Boehner ally, said dis­cus­sions will con­tin­ue next week, with the bill to be put to the floor soon­er rather than later — and that mem­bers are un­likely to vote against a bor­der-se­cur­ity bill.

“We’ve al­ways said we’re go­ing to do this piece by piece, so you can’t take that po­s­i­tion and then turn around and try and do a com­pre­hens­ive bill,” Cole said. “That’s not what we be­lieve in. We be­lieve in rifle-shot le­gis­la­tion.”

Any law­suit from Con­gress tar­get­ing White House im­mig­ra­tion policy would not be alone in the courts. More than half of the states, led by Texas, have already sued, chal­len­ging in fed­er­al court wheth­er Obama’s dir­ect­ives should be al­lowed to go in­to ef­fect. Oth­er states and cit­ies have filed briefs in the case de­fend­ing the ac­tion.

Late last year, a fed­er­al judge threw out an­oth­er, sim­il­ar case, filed by Ari­zona’s Mari­copa County Sher­iff Joe Arpaio and an im­mig­ra­tion act­iv­ist.

The House is already su­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion on an­oth­er is­sue. Last year, the cham­ber voted along party lines to au­thor­ize a law­suit chal­len­ging, among oth­er parts of the law, the leg­al­ity of Obama’s delay of a rule man­dat­ing that em­ploy­ers provide health in­sur­ance to their work­ers.

House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi seized on the news Tues­day as “an ad­mis­sion of fail­ure” by the GOP on im­mig­ra­tion policy.

“Re­pub­lic­ans’ rad­ic­al anti-im­mig­rant le­gis­la­tion is dead on ar­rival,” Pelosi spokes­man Drew Ham­mill said in a state­ment. “Once again, House Re­pub­lic­ans are crawl­ing to the courts to re­lieve them of their re­spons­ib­il­ity to gov­ern.”

COR­REC­TION: An earli­er ver­sion of this art­icle misat­trib­uted a state­ment from House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi’s of­fice. The state­ment was made by Pelosi spokes­man Drew Hammill.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5485) }}

Contributions by Rachel Roubein

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.