How Black Middle-Class Kids Become Poor Adults

Once grown, African-American children are more likely than their white peers to backslide into a lower economic group.

National Journal
Gillian B. White, The Atlantic
Add to Briefcase
Gillian B. White, The Atlantic
Feb. 8, 2015, 8:43 p.m.

When it comes to fin­an­cial sta­bil­ity, black Amer­ic­ans are of­ten in much more pre­cari­ous situ­ations than white Amer­ic­ans. Their un­em­ploy­ment rate is high­er, and so is the level of poverty with­in the black com­munity. In 2013, the poverty rate among white Amer­ic­ans was 9.6 per­cent; among black Amer­ic­ans it was 27.2 per­cent. And the gap between the wealth of white fam­il­ies and black fam­il­ies has widened to its highest levels since 1989, ac­cord­ing to a 2014 study by Pew Re­search Cen­ter.

The facts of this rift aren’t new, or all that sur­pris­ing. But per­haps what’s most un­set­tling about the cur­rent eco­nom­ic cli­mate in black Amer­ica is that when black fam­il­ies at­tain middle-class status, the like­li­hood that their chil­dren will re­main there, or do bet­ter, isn’t high.

“Even black Amer­ic­ans who make it to the middle class are likely to see their kids fall down the lad­der,” writes Richard Reeves, a seni­or fel­low at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion. In a re­cent blog post Reeves says that sev­en of 10 black chil­dren who are born to fam­il­ies with in­come that falls in the middle quin­tile of the spec­trum will find them­selves with in­come that’s one to two quin­tiles be­low their par­ents’ dur­ing their own adult­hood.

A 2014 study from the Fed­er­al Re­serve Bank of Chica­go, which looked at factors such as par­ent­al in­come, edu­ca­tion, and fam­ily struc­ture, shows a sim­il­ar pat­tern: Many black Amer­ic­ans not only fail to move up, but also show an in­creased like­li­hood of back­slid­ing. Ac­cord­ing to the study, “In re­cent dec­ades, blacks have ex­per­i­enced sub­stan­tially less up­ward in­tergen­er­a­tion­al mo­bil­ity and sub­stan­tially more down­ward in­tergen­er­a­tion­al mo­bil­ity than whites.”

The great­er prob­ab­il­ity of slip­ping back ap­plies to blacks across in­come groups. Ac­cord­ing to the Fed study, about 60 per­cent of black chil­dren whose par­ents had in­come that fell in­to the top 50 per­cent of the dis­tri­bu­tion saw their own in­come fall in­to the bot­tom half dur­ing adult­hood. This type of down­ward slide was com­mon for only 36 per­cent of white chil­dren.

But the gap in mo­bil­ity was sig­ni­fic­ant for lower-class fam­il­ies as well. “For most of the bot­tom half of the in­come dis­tri­bu­tion, the ra­cial dif­fer­ences in up­ward mo­bil­ity are con­sist­ently between 20 and 30 per­cent,” writes seni­or eco­nom­ist Bhashkar Ma­zum­der, the study’s au­thor. “If fu­ture gen­er­a­tions of white and black Amer­ic­ans ex­per­i­ence the same rates of in­tergen­er­a­tion­al mo­bil­ity as these co­horts, we should ex­pect to see that blacks on av­er­age would not make any re­l­at­ive pro­gress.”

The ex­plan­a­tions for this phe­nomen­on are var­ied, but largely hinge on many of the ex­ist­ing cri­ti­cisms re­lat­ing to so­cioeco­nom­ics and race in the U.S. Eco­nom­ists cite lower edu­ca­tion­al at­tain­ment, high­er rates of single-par­ent house­holds, and geo­graph­ic se­greg­a­tion as po­ten­tial ex­plan­a­tions for these trends. The lat­ter de­term­ines not only what neigh­bor­hoods people live in, but of­ten what types of schools chil­dren at­tend — and that could play a role in hinder­ing their edu­ca­tion­al and pro­fes­sion­al at­tain­ment later on. Ac­cord­ing to Reeves, “In terms of op­por­tun­ity, there are still two Amer­icas, di­vided by race.”

Still, most eco­nom­ists lack a clear, defin­it­ive ex­plan­a­tion for why, after reach­ing the middle class, many black Amer­ic­an fam­il­ies quickly lose that status as their chil­dren fall be­hind.

What We're Following See More »
House GOP May Change Method for Committee Assignments
41 minutes ago

"House Republicans on Thursday will consider changes to their internal conference rules, with several amendments targeting the process for selecting committee leaders. The biggest proposed change comes from Wisconsin Rep. Mike Gallagher, who wants committee members to be able to choose their own chairmen or ranking members," rather than leadership or the steering committee.

Avenatti Arrested For Felony Domestic Violence
5 hours ago
Judge to Rule Thursday on Ranked-Choice Voting
6 hours ago
Flake Threatens to Withhold Support for Judges
6 hours ago
Mueller Probing Whether Roger Stone Intimidated Witness
8 hours ago

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office is exploring whether longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone tried to intimidate and discredit a witness who is contradicting Mr. Stone’s version of events about his contacts with WikiLeaks, according to people who have spoken to Mr. Mueller’s investigators. In grand jury sessions and interviews, prosecutors have repeatedly asked about emails, text messages and online posts involving Mr. Stone and his former friend, New York radio personality Randy Credico, the people said. Mr. Stone has asserted that Mr. Credico was his backchannel to WikiLeaks, a controversial transparency group, an assertion Mr. Credico denies."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.