Vitter Blocks OPM Pick Over Hill Staff ‘Obamacare Exemption’

Senator wants an explanation for why congressional aides can get employer subsidies to buy health insurance.

A woman looks at the insurance exchange internet site October 1, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Feb. 11, 2015, 12:13 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama’s uni­lat­er­al ac­tion on im­mig­ra­tion isn’t to blame for the latest GOP move to block one of his nom­in­ees. This time, it’s health care.

On Wed­nes­day, Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter an­nounced he would hold the nom­in­a­tion of re­tired U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Earl Gay to serve as the deputy dir­ect­or of the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment. Gay cur­rently serves as seni­or ad­viser to the dir­ect­or of OPM, the typ­ic­ally non­con­tro­ver­sial agency that man­ages fed­er­al job-an­nounce­ment post­ings, con­ducts back­ground checks on pro­spect­ive em­ploy­ees, man­ages pen­sion be­ne­fits, and more.

And why? Be­cause of what the Louisi­ana Re­pub­lic­an calls the “Wash­ing­ton Ex­emp­tion from Obama­care,” which Vit­ter has of­ten railed against.

Es­sen­tially, the Af­ford­able Care Act re­quires law­makers and some con­gres­sion­al staff to re­ceive their health in­sur­ance on the Wash­ing­ton, D.C., health ex­change, called D.C. Health Link. But some staff can be con­sidered “un­of­fi­cial.” And, voilà, that loop­hole has al­lowed staff to get their health in­sur­ance the old way, through the Fed­er­al Em­ploy­ees Health Be­ne­fits pro­gram, where they are al­loc­ated a sti­pend to pay for health in­sur­ance.

But, here’s the catch that Vit­ter calls the “Wash­ing­ton Ex­emp­tion”: OPM de­cided that staffers, those des­ig­nated as “of­fi­cial staff,” would sign up through the D.C. small-busi­ness health mar­ket­place. This means their em­ploy­ers are al­lowed to make con­tri­bu­tions to their health plan (though there’s a lim­it to how much can be giv­en).

“OPM cre­ated the Wash­ing­ton Ex­emp­tion from Obama­care, and they still haven’t answered ques­tions about how and why,” Vit­ter said in a state­ment. “Once they an­swer some spe­cif­ic ques­tions about why they think Con­gress is en­titled to a spe­cial ex­emp­tion from Obama­care, I’ll re­lease the hold.”

Vit­ter has con­tin­ued to push for a change. In Decem­ber, he pro­posed a non­bind­ing party rule to Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans, ur­ging them to put their per­son­al, com­mit­tee, and lead­er­ship staff on D.C.’s health ex­change. It passed un­an­im­ously by voice vote. Last week, he launched an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to why Con­gress is clas­si­fied as a small busi­ness for health in­sur­ance pur­poses. Pro­ponents of this clas­si­fic­a­tion ar­gue that each of­fice and com­mit­tee has its own fi­nite budget and staff.

But oth­er Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans have already signed off on Gay’s nom­in­a­tion, as it passed the Sen­ate Home­land Se­cur­ity and Gov­ern­ment­al Af­fairs Com­mit­tee last month.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell is now tasked with scut­tling ob­jec­tions to Obama’s nom­in­ees from his party — and it’s his prob­lem to solve, said Adam Jentleson, Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id’s spokes­man.

“Noth­ing’s changed,” Jentleson said. “It’s just more of the same Re­pub­lic­an ob­struc­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump Inauguration Spending Now Under Investigation
6 hours ago

"Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it raised from donations, people familiar with the matter said. The criminal probe by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which is in its early stages, also is examining whether some of the committee’s top donors gave money in exchange for access to the incoming Trump administration, policy concessions or to influence official administration positions."

Federal Judges Nix Proposed Atlantic Pipeline
8 hours ago

In a rare rebuke to energy companies in the Trump era, "a panel of federal judges has rejected permits for the Atlantic Coast natural gas pipeline to cross two national forests and the Appalachian trail in Virginia, finding that the national Forest Service 'abdicated its responsibility' and kowtowed to private industry in approving the project. The harshly worded, 60-page decision issued Thursday by three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is part of a string of legal setbacks for the 600-mile pipeline. The $7 billion project, being built by a consortium of companies led by Dominion Energy, is planned to carry natural gas from West Virginia, through Virginia and into North Carolina."

Senate Moves to End Support for Saudi War
8 hours ago
Federal Judge Upholds Ranked-Choice Voting in Maine
10 hours ago

"A federal judge on Thursday rejected Republican U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin’s constitutional claims against ranked-choice voting and denied the incumbent’s request for a new election against Democratic Congressman-elect Jared Golden. U.S. District Court Judge Lance Walker ruled that, contrary to the arguments of Poliquin’s legal team, the U.S. Constitution does not require that whichever congressional candidates receives the most votes—or 'a plurality'—be declared the winner. Instead, Walker ruled the Constitution grants states broad discretion to run elections."

Mueller Probing Middle East Countries' Influence Campaigns
11 hours ago

Officials working under Special Counsel Robert Mueller are investigating Middle Eastern countries' attempts to influence American politics, and are set to release the findings in early 2019. "Various witnesses affiliated with the Trump campaign have been questioned about their conversations with deeply connected individuals from the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Israel ... Topics in those meetings ranged from the use of social-media manipulation to help install Trump in the White House to the overthrow of the regime in Iran." Investigators are also probing meetings organized by Lebanese-American businessman George Nader, and Joel Zamel, "a self-styled Mark Zuckerberg of the national-security world with deep ties to Israeli intelligence."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.