Hillary Clinton’s Play for Pennsylvania

Obama lost ground in the traditionally-Democratic state in 2012. But with the convention in Philadelphia, Democrats are confident they will extend their winning streak.

Hillary Clinton speaks during a rally in Philadelphia the night she won the Pennsylvania primary on April 22, 2008.
National Journal
Emily Schultheis
Add to Briefcase
Emily Schultheis
Feb. 12, 2015, 3 p.m.

Demo­crats face two ma­jor demo­graph­ic chal­lenges in the 2016 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. First, can Hil­lary Clin­ton, as­sum­ing she’s the party’s nom­in­ee, win back the white work­ing-class voters who have drif­ted to­ward Re­pub­lic­ans in re­cent years? And second, will she be able to main­tain the Demo­crat­ic co­ali­tion that twice elec­ted Barack Obama pres­id­ent — in­clud­ing the sky-high turnout among Afric­an-Amer­ic­an voters his cam­paign spurred?

Those ques­tions will be partly answered in Pennsylvania, where Demo­crats have just an­nounced they’re hold­ing their 2016 con­ven­tion.

As Phil­adelphia’s se­lec­tion for the 2016 Demo­crat­ic con­ven­tion spurs head­lines about the sym­bol­ism of In­de­pend­ence Hall and the Liberty Bell, the im­port­ance of the state goes far bey­ond that. It’s a mi­cro­cosm of the chal­lenges Demo­crats face in put­ting to­geth­er a win­ning co­ali­tion.

Pennsylvania is the GOP’s per­en­ni­al white whale: Every four years, Re­pub­lic­ans puts money and time in­to a last-minute ef­fort to mine the state’s elect­or­al votes — and every time since 1988, they’ve been un­suc­cess­ful. Though it’s still early, Demo­crats and ob­serv­ers in the state say that with Demo­crats’ pres­id­en­tial-year elect­or­al ad­vant­ages there, there’s little chance that dy­nam­ic will change this time around.

“It’s a state that has be­come solidly blue in pres­id­en­tial polit­ics and now, in many ways, is a corner­stone of the Demo­crat­ic elect­or­al co­ali­tion, along with oth­er big states — along with New York, Illinois, and Cali­for­nia,” said Chris Bor­ick, a vet­er­an Pennsylvania poll­ster at Muh­len­berg Col­lege, adding that win­ning Pennsylvania is “al­most a giv­en for Demo­crats.”

A Feb­ru­ary Quin­nipi­ac poll found Clin­ton start­ing out strong in Pennsylvania with high fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ings and double-di­git leads over all her would-be GOP chal­lengers. Fifty-five per­cent of the state’s voters viewed her fa­vor­ably, com­pared with 38 per­cent who viewed her un­fa­vor­ably — far bet­ter than any of the GOP hope­fuls fared. In hy­po­thet­ic­al head-to-head match­ups, Clin­ton bested New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie by 11 points (50-39), former Flor­ida Gov. Jeb Bush by 15 points (50-35), Sen. Rand Paul of Ken­tucky by 19 points (53-34), and both former Arkan­sas Gov. Mike Hucka­bee and former Sen. Rick San­tor­um of Pennsylvania by 20 points (54-34).

But Pennsylvania is a geo­graph­ic­ally and demo­graph­ic­ally di­verse state — and how Clin­ton fares there among the state’s elect­or­ate will be an in­dic­a­tion of her abil­ity to shape a win­ning na­tion­al co­ali­tion. Vic­tory for Demo­crats now largely hinges on the south­east­ern part of the state, where they need to draw a strong turnout in Phil­adelphia prop­er and to win a ma­jor­ity in the four sub­urb­an counties (Mont­gomery, Bucks, Chester, and Delaware) that sur­round it. At the same time, a sig­ni­fic­ant chunk of the state — the south­west­ern part near Pitt­s­burgh and the north­east­ern part sur­round­ing Scrant­on — is full of white, work­ing-class voters whom Demo­crats have struggled with in re­cent years.

Pennsylvania Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ives and ob­serv­ers say Clin­ton has a track re­cord of con­nect­ing bet­ter with the state’s work­ing-class elect­or­ate than Obama did in 2008 and 2012 — but that Afric­an-Amer­ic­an turnout drop-off is cer­tainly a con­cern. In an in­ter­view with BuzzFeed, Obama said he didn’t “think any pres­id­ent in­her­its a co­ali­tion,” adding that “any can­did­ate has to win over people based on what they stand for, what their mes­sage is, what their vis­ion is for the fu­ture.”

Back in the 2008 Demo­crat­ic primary, when Clin­ton de­feated Obama by just un­der 10 points, the former sec­ret­ary of State did well among ex­actly those kinds of voters. Exit polls found Clin­ton ahead of Obama among Pennsylvania’s white voters, low- and middle-in­come voters, and those without a col­lege de­gree.

“Her fath­er came from Scrant­on, so she’s al­ways had a strong base there in the same way that Joe Biden has,” said Charlie Ly­ons, a vet­er­an Demo­crat­ic strategist in the state. “And I think she comes out of that area strong, and in the south­w­est I think she has the po­ten­tial to come out per­haps even stronger than the pres­id­ent did.”

As a sur­rog­ate for now-Gov. Tom Wolf in Phil­adelphia last fall, Clin­ton came out swinging with what ob­serv­ers say is the closest in­dic­a­tion she’s giv­en of the kind of mes­sage her cam­paign could have — one heavy on eco­nom­ic fair­ness, equal pay, and edu­ca­tion fund­ing. These are the kinds of is­sues that play well among both minor­ity voters and work­ing-class whites.

As for Afric­an-Amer­ic­an voters in Phil­adelphia, ob­serv­ers in the state say it would be tough for Clin­ton to match the kind of turnout Obama drew among that demo­graph­ic — but that the drop-off wouldn’t be enough to af­fect her chances in the state. In 2008, exit polling data showed Obama win­ning 95 per­cent of Afric­an-Amer­ic­an voters in Pennsylvania, com­pared with just 5 per­cent for Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­ee John Mc­Cain; even if turnout among that demo­graph­ic de­creases, the mar­gins will likely be sim­il­ar.

“She clearly has room to build on voters that Obama didn’t have — while be­ing chal­lenged to make sure she has the same or close levels of turnout in the Demo­crat-rich Phil­adelphia city lim­its,” Bor­ick said.

Even if Pennsylvania seems un­likely to top 2016’s list of pres­id­en­tial swing states, it will un­doubtedly be home to one of the most com­pet­it­ive Sen­ate cam­paigns on the map this cycle: the race to un­seat GOP Sen. Pat Toomey, who rode in­to of­fice on the Re­pub­lic­an wave of 2010.

And while party con­ven­tions rarely have an ef­fect on the pres­id­en­tial elect­or­al out­come in a state, they’re known for en­er­giz­ing the party base and draw­ing at­ten­tion to in-state can­did­ates — which, for Phil­adelphia, could have a pos­it­ive ef­fect on turn­ing the city’s Afric­an-Amer­ic­an voters out to the polls that fall for both Clin­ton and Toomey’s Demo­crat­ic chal­lenger.

“Pat Toomey is go­ing to be ser­i­ously chal­lenged,” said Dan Fee, a vet­er­an of both of former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell’s gubernat­ori­al cam­paigns. “This is a year, and this is a race, in which there will be sig­ni­fic­ant turnout in areas that will nev­er vote for Pat Toomey.”

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
13 hours ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
16 hours ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
18 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login