Parsing Patriotism

Defining the bounds of acceptable political rhetoric is child’s play.

National Journal
Ron Fournier
Add to Briefcase
Ron Fournier
Feb. 21, 2015, 9:57 a.m.

Child-de­vel­op­ment ex­perts cau­tion par­ents to choose their words care­fully when ad­mon­ish­ing their kids. Say your teen­ager is mis­be­hav­ing in school and bul­ly­ing class­mates. You could say, “You’re an ass” or “You’re act­ing like an ass.” Both in­sults are hurt­ful, but the lat­ter will do less harm.

Vil­i­fy the be­ha­vi­or, ex­perts say, not the child.

Now let’s ex­tend that ana­logy to an­oth­er group of kids — Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic politi­cians and the pun­dits who feed off them (yes, in­clud­ing me).

In 2008, Demo­crat­ic pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate Barack Obama cri­ti­cized Pres­id­ent George W. Bush for adding $4 tril­lion to the U.S. debt. “That’s ir­re­spons­ible,” he said. “That’s un­pat­ri­ot­ic.”

By fo­cus­ing on the ac­tion rather than Bush as a per­son, Obama’s for­mu­la­tion is the rough equi­val­ent to a moth­er telling her child, “You’re act­ing like an ass.”

Sim­il­arly, I cri­ti­cized Re­pub­lic­ans in late 2013 for root­ing for the Af­ford­able Care Act to fail, adding on MS­N­BC’S “Daily Run­down”: “And I frankly find that un­pat­ri­ot­ic. The law’s been passed. We should all be do­ing what we can to make it work.”

I called the act of un­der­min­ing a law passed by Con­gress and signed by the pres­id­ent un­pat­ri­ot­ic. I did not call Re­pub­lic­ans un­pat­ri­ot­ic.

Still, that’s not what many con­ser­vat­ives heard. My dis­tinc­tion made no dif­fer­ence to people who now think I ques­tioned their pat­ri­ot­ism.

I re­gret that. I need to be more care­ful with my words.

Go back to our par­ent­ing ana­logy. “Over time, chil­dren be­come who we tell them they are, so we have to be very care­ful with our words,” says Steph­en Gray Wal­lace, au­thor and school psy­cho­lo­gist who runs the Cen­ter for Ad­oles­cent Re­search and Edu­ca­tion (CARE). “It’s one thing to identi­fy the be­ha­vi­or. It’s an­oth­er to then ascribe your dis­pleas­ure to a per­son.”

“So you might say to a kid, ‘I don’t think you’re work­ing as hard as you could.’ That’s very dif­fer­ent than, ‘You’re lazy.’”

Wal­lace says the polit­ic­al ana­logue on Obama­care would be for me to ar­gue that Amer­ica is at its best when we share re­spons­ib­il­ity for mak­ing laws work, even when we dis­agree with them. Obama might have spoken to the cross-gen­er­a­tion­al value of fisc­al san­ity rather than call Bush’s ac­tions un­pat­ri­ot­ic.

In polit­ics and life, cer­tain words in­flame and should be avoided. Like “lazy” and “ass” for a par­ent — and “un­pat­ri­ot­ic” for a pres­id­ent or pun­dit.

An­oth­er loaded word is “lie.” I’ve used it on oc­ca­sion to de­scribe what I be­lieve to be a know­ing de­cep­tion by mem­bers of the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion to jus­ti­fy war in Ir­aq. I don’t think Bush him­self lied, but Judge Laurence H. Sil­ber­man re­cently quoted me mak­ing that ac­cus­a­tion on FOX News.

I could quibble with the quote. I could say I mis­s­poke. I could make the dis­tinc­tion between the Bush and his ad­min­is­tra­tion. But, again, I ask my­self: Can I choose my words more care­fully? Yes.

Which brings me to Rudy Gi­uliani. The former New York may­or and hero of 9/11 has nu­mer­ous con­cerns about the dir­ec­tion Obama has taken the coun­try. Wheth­er you agree with Gi­uliani or not, no fair-minded per­son would deny him the right to strongly cri­ti­cize Obama’s stance to­ward Is­lam­ic ex­trem­ism and his policies to fight IS­IS.

Gi­uliani could have said Obama’s ac­tions and policies are en­dan­ger­ing Amer­ica or, step­ping it up a notch, “The pres­id­ent’s policies to­ward IS­IS are un­pat­ri­ot­ic.”

In­stead, he made it harshly per­son­al. He jumped the rails: “I do not be­lieve the pres­id­ent loves Amer­ica.”

Nobody knows what’s in an­oth­er per­son’s heart. The pre­sump­tion is that every Amer­ic­an loves this coun­try un­less it can be proved oth­er­wise — and there is a high bar for es­tab­lish­ing treas­on.

The worst you can say about Obama is he’s a bad pres­id­ent. Go ahead, say it. But don’t say he’s a bad Amer­ic­an un­less you’re will­ing to be judged just as shal­lowly, even dan­ger­ously, by people who don’t share your ideo­logy.

Ask any par­ent: Our cul­ture is coarsen­ing. Ci­vil­ity is erod­ing. The In­ter­net eas­ily re­in­forces and amp­li­fies hate­ful lan­guage. Nobody wants to live in a coun­try where the sin­gu­lar meas­ure of pat­ri­ot­ism is that you agree with me.

Gi­uliani isn’t a de­plor­able man. His words were.

What We're Following See More »
SEEKS COMPENSATORY DAMAGES
DNC Files Sweeping Lawsuit Over 2016 Election
51 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Democratic National Committee filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit Friday against the Russian government, the Trump campaign and the WikiLeaks organization alleging a far-reaching conspiracy to disrupt the 2016 campaign and tilt the election to Donald Trump. The complaint, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, alleges that top Trump campaign officials conspired with the Russian government and its military spy agency to hurt Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and help Trump by hacking the computer networks of the Democratic Party and disseminating stolen material found there." The DNC is seeking "millions of dollars in compensation to offset damage it claims the party suffered from the hacks," and is arguing the cyberattack" undermined its ability to communicate with voters, collect donations and operate effectively as its employees faced personal harassment and, in some cases, death threats."

Source:
BIGGEST FINE OF TRUMP ERA
Wells-Fargo Fined $1 Billion For Defrauding Customers
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have fined Wells Fargo $1 billion dollars for convincing customers to buy insurance they did not need, and could not afford. "In October, the bank revealed that some mortgage borrowers were inappropriately charged for missing a deadline to lock in promised interest rates, even though the delays were Wells Fargo's fault." The bank has also apologized for . "charging as many as 570,000 clients for car insurance they didn't need," and found that about 20,000 of those customers "may have defaulted on their car loans and had their vehicles repossessed in part because of those unnecessary insurance costs."

Source:
ON UNOFFICIAL MARIJUANA HOLIDAY, 4/20
Schumer To Introduce Bill Legalizing Marijuana
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., plans to introduce legislation on Friday to decriminalize marijuana on the federal level, adding a high-profile advocate in the effort to decriminalize, legalize and normalize marijuana use in America." The bill would "remove marijuana from the list of scheduled substances," establish funding sources for businesses and research, and establish regulations akin to those for tobacco and alcohol. "'If smoking marijuana doesn't hurt anybody else, why shouldn't we allow people to do it and not make it criminal?' Schumer told HBO's Vice News in a Thursday interview previewing his bill."

Source:
LEVERAGE FOR SPECIAL COUNSEL PROTECTION
Democrats Consider Holding Up Pompeo Nomination
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democrats on the Foreign Relations Committee are considering "refusing to vote to discharge" President Trump's nominee for Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, in order pressure Sen. McConnell to take up a "sense-of-the-Senate resolution" that Special Counsel Mueller should be allowed to continue his investigation. If the Democratic Senators move forward with the plan, Republicans say McConnell "could simply trigger the so-called nuclear option" by declaring the move out-of-order, and bring Pompeo's nomination to the floor through a majority vote. The move is politically risky, as it would likely "heighten partisan tensions and play into President Trump’s arguments that Democrats are actively obstructing him."

Source:
“WALK-INS” STARTED ON MONDAY
Arizona Teachers Vote For Walk-Outs
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login