Parsing Patriotism

Defining the bounds of acceptable political rhetoric is child’s play.

National Journal
Ron Fournier
Add to Briefcase
Ron Fournier
Feb. 21, 2015, 9:57 a.m.

Child-de­vel­op­ment ex­perts cau­tion par­ents to choose their words care­fully when ad­mon­ish­ing their kids. Say your teen­ager is mis­be­hav­ing in school and bul­ly­ing class­mates. You could say, “You’re an ass” or “You’re act­ing like an ass.” Both in­sults are hurt­ful, but the lat­ter will do less harm.

Vil­i­fy the be­ha­vi­or, ex­perts say, not the child.

Now let’s ex­tend that ana­logy to an­oth­er group of kids — Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic politi­cians and the pun­dits who feed off them (yes, in­clud­ing me).

In 2008, Demo­crat­ic pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate Barack Obama cri­ti­cized Pres­id­ent George W. Bush for adding $4 tril­lion to the U.S. debt. “That’s ir­re­spons­ible,” he said. “That’s un­pat­ri­ot­ic.”

By fo­cus­ing on the ac­tion rather than Bush as a per­son, Obama’s for­mu­la­tion is the rough equi­val­ent to a moth­er telling her child, “You’re act­ing like an ass.”

Sim­il­arly, I cri­ti­cized Re­pub­lic­ans in late 2013 for root­ing for the Af­ford­able Care Act to fail, adding on MS­N­BC’S “Daily Run­down”: “And I frankly find that un­pat­ri­ot­ic. The law’s been passed. We should all be do­ing what we can to make it work.”

I called the act of un­der­min­ing a law passed by Con­gress and signed by the pres­id­ent un­pat­ri­ot­ic. I did not call Re­pub­lic­ans un­pat­ri­ot­ic.

Still, that’s not what many con­ser­vat­ives heard. My dis­tinc­tion made no dif­fer­ence to people who now think I ques­tioned their pat­ri­ot­ism.

I re­gret that. I need to be more care­ful with my words.

Go back to our par­ent­ing ana­logy. “Over time, chil­dren be­come who we tell them they are, so we have to be very care­ful with our words,” says Steph­en Gray Wal­lace, au­thor and school psy­cho­lo­gist who runs the Cen­ter for Ad­oles­cent Re­search and Edu­ca­tion (CARE). “It’s one thing to identi­fy the be­ha­vi­or. It’s an­oth­er to then ascribe your dis­pleas­ure to a per­son.”

“So you might say to a kid, ‘I don’t think you’re work­ing as hard as you could.’ That’s very dif­fer­ent than, ‘You’re lazy.’”

Wal­lace says the polit­ic­al ana­logue on Obama­care would be for me to ar­gue that Amer­ica is at its best when we share re­spons­ib­il­ity for mak­ing laws work, even when we dis­agree with them. Obama might have spoken to the cross-gen­er­a­tion­al value of fisc­al san­ity rather than call Bush’s ac­tions un­pat­ri­ot­ic.

In polit­ics and life, cer­tain words in­flame and should be avoided. Like “lazy” and “ass” for a par­ent — and “un­pat­ri­ot­ic” for a pres­id­ent or pun­dit.

An­oth­er loaded word is “lie.” I’ve used it on oc­ca­sion to de­scribe what I be­lieve to be a know­ing de­cep­tion by mem­bers of the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion to jus­ti­fy war in Ir­aq. I don’t think Bush him­self lied, but Judge Laurence H. Sil­ber­man re­cently quoted me mak­ing that ac­cus­a­tion on FOX News.

I could quibble with the quote. I could say I mis­s­poke. I could make the dis­tinc­tion between the Bush and his ad­min­is­tra­tion. But, again, I ask my­self: Can I choose my words more care­fully? Yes.

Which brings me to Rudy Gi­uliani. The former New York may­or and hero of 9/11 has nu­mer­ous con­cerns about the dir­ec­tion Obama has taken the coun­try. Wheth­er you agree with Gi­uliani or not, no fair-minded per­son would deny him the right to strongly cri­ti­cize Obama’s stance to­ward Is­lam­ic ex­trem­ism and his policies to fight IS­IS.

Gi­uliani could have said Obama’s ac­tions and policies are en­dan­ger­ing Amer­ica or, step­ping it up a notch, “The pres­id­ent’s policies to­ward IS­IS are un­pat­ri­ot­ic.”

In­stead, he made it harshly per­son­al. He jumped the rails: “I do not be­lieve the pres­id­ent loves Amer­ica.”

Nobody knows what’s in an­oth­er per­son’s heart. The pre­sump­tion is that every Amer­ic­an loves this coun­try un­less it can be proved oth­er­wise — and there is a high bar for es­tab­lish­ing treas­on.

The worst you can say about Obama is he’s a bad pres­id­ent. Go ahead, say it. But don’t say he’s a bad Amer­ic­an un­less you’re will­ing to be judged just as shal­lowly, even dan­ger­ously, by people who don’t share your ideo­logy.

Ask any par­ent: Our cul­ture is coarsen­ing. Ci­vil­ity is erod­ing. The In­ter­net eas­ily re­in­forces and amp­li­fies hate­ful lan­guage. Nobody wants to live in a coun­try where the sin­gu­lar meas­ure of pat­ri­ot­ism is that you agree with me.

Gi­uliani isn’t a de­plor­able man. His words were.

What We're Following See More »
Congress Heads Back to Work to End Shutdown
7 hours ago

"The Senate was expected to be back in session at noon, while House lawmakers were told to return to work for a 9 a.m. session. Mr. Trump on Friday had canceled plans to travel to his private resort on Palm Beach, Fla., where a celebration had been planned for Saturday to celebrate the anniversary of his first year in office."

Government Shutdown Begins, as Senate Balks at Stopgap
10 hours ago

"A stopgap spending bill stalled in the Senate Friday night, leading to a government shutdown for the first time since 2013. The continuing resolution funding agencies expired at midnight, and lawmakers were unable to spell out any path forward to keep government open. The Senate on Friday night failed to reach cloture on a four-week spending bill the House had already approved."

Mueller’s Team Scrutinizing Russian Embassy Transactions
2 days ago
FBI Investigating Potential Russian Donations to NRA
2 days ago

"The FBI is investigating whether a top Russian banker with ties to the Kremlin illegally funneled money to the National Rifle Association to help Donald Trump win the presidency." Investigators have focused on Alexander Torshin, the deputy governor of Russia’s central bank "who is known for his close relationships with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and the NRA." The solicitation or use of foreign funds is illegal in U.S. elections under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) by either lobbying groups or political campaigns. The NRA reported spending a record $55 million on the 2016 elections.

Mueller Investigation Leads to Hundreds of New FARA Filings
2 days ago

"Hundreds of new and supplemental FARA filings by U.S. lobbyists and public relations firms" have been submitted "since Special Counsel Mueller charged two Trump aides with failing to disclose their lobbying work on behalf of foreign countries. The number of first-time filings ... rose 50 percent to 102 between 2016 and 2017, an NBC News analysis found. The number of supplemental filings, which include details about campaign donations, meetings and phone calls more than doubled from 618 to 1,244 last year as lobbyists scrambled to avoid the same fate as some of Trump's associates and their business partners."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.