Mitch McConnell Announces a Vote on Clean DHS Funding Is Coming

The Senate majority leader is making his move to try and prevent a shutdown.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 29: Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks while flanked by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) (L) on January 29, 2015 at the US Capitol in Washington, DC. The US Senate is holding a cloture vote on the Keystone XL Pipeline. 
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Mimms and Lauren Fox
Feb. 24, 2015, 9:32 a.m.

With the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment set to shut down on Sat­urday, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell on Tues­day offered Sen­ate Demo­crats everything they wanted. And then, as with mice and cook­ies, they asked for some more.


Mc­Con­nell told re­port­ers Tues­day that after two months of beg­ging, he would fi­nally agree to give Demo­crats a clean vote to fund DHS through the end of the fisc­al year. The fund­ing, based on an agree­ment between Demo­crat­ic and Re­pub­lic­an ap­pro­pri­at­ors last year, would come with no strings at­tached.

“I’ve in­dic­ated to the Demo­crat­ic lead­er that I’d be happy to have his co­oper­a­tion to ad­vance the con­sid­er­a­tion of a clean DHS bill which would carry us through till Septem­ber 30th,” Mc­Con­nell said to press Tues­day.

Then, he would hold a vote Fri­day to de­fund Pres­id­ent Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion on im­mig­ra­tion, as a con­sol­a­tion prize for con­ser­vat­ives in the House and Sen­ate who have pushed to tie the two is­sues to­geth­er. That se­quence would keep DHS open and could earn enough Demo­crat­ic votes to pass the sep­ar­ate meas­ure de­fund­ing the pres­id­ent’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion. Already Sens. Claire Mc­Caskill and Joe Manchin have said they will vote to move for­ward the im­mig­ra­tion bill; al­though Mc­Caskill said that the DHS fund­ing must come first and hasn’t made a de­cision on wheth­er she’ll vote for the un­der­ly­ing im­mig­ra­tion meas­ure.

But when Demo­crats heard the news, they were not im­pressed. Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id said that he had a pos­it­ive meet­ing with Mc­Con­nell on Tues­day, but then asked for more: House Speak­er John Boehner’s guar­an­tee that the clean DHS fund­ing bill could pass the House.

That’s a tall or­der for Boehner, who will meet with his con­fer­ence to dis­cuss their op­tions on Wed­nes­day. It’s likely that a clean DHS fund­ing bill will earn the vast ma­jor­ity of Demo­crat­ic votes in the House, but with con­ser­vat­ives riled up about the im­mig­ra­tion meas­ure, it will be a much harder sell in Boehner’s own con­fer­ence.

Mc­Con­nell told re­port­ers Tues­day, “I do not know what the House will do.”

Mc­Con­nell spokes­man Don Stew­art would not say wheth­er Mc­Con­nell had told Boehner about his new strategy be­fore mak­ing the an­nounce­ment Monday night, al­though he ac­know­ledged that the two lead­ers speak of­ten.

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ar­iz., said Mc­Con­nell an­nounced the de­cision at a con­fer­ence lunch­eon Tues­day, but that the an­nounce­ment had drawn ire from more-con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers who be­lieve Mc­Con­nell was giv­ing in to Demo­crat­ic de­mands without hold­ing the pres­id­ent ac­count­able. Mul­tiple Re­pub­lic­ans in the meet­ing said there was still broad dis­agree­ment as to wheth­er a cav­ing to Demo­crats de­mands for a clean fund­ing bill was the best course for­ward.

“Most of us feel like the courts gave us a ma­jor vic­tory,” Sen. Bob Cork­er, R-Tenn., said out­lining the ra­tionale for Mc­Con­nell to of­fer a clean DHS bill now after weeks of not back­ing down. “Some­times it makes a lot of sense to bank vic­tor­ies and move ahead.”

Sen. Jeff Ses­sions, R-Ala., who has been a ma­jor ad­voc­ate of ty­ing DHS fund­ing to block­ing Obama’s ac­tions, says he thinks lead­er­ship should stick with the ori­gin­al plan.

“I think it is a big deal of huge, his­tor­ic im­port­ance,” Ses­sions says.” I will be glad to con­sider what our lead­ers have talked about, but I re­main firmly con­vinced that at this point Con­gress should put the heat where it be­longs, and that is on the pres­id­ent.”

Out­side con­ser­vat­ives, who have been known to in­flu­ence Boehner’s abil­ity to get his con­fer­ence to “yes” have already said they are op­posed to stand alone DHS fund­ing bill. Sen­ate Con­ser­vat­ives Fund tweeted Tues­day, “Sen­ate GOP lead­ers sur­render again “¦ plan to fund Obama’s am­nesty for the rest of the fisc­al year.”

The in­flu­ence, es­pe­cially of a group such as Her­it­age Ac­tion for Amer­ica, which an­nounced it will key vote a “no” on a clean DHS fund­ing vote, could still de­rail any DHS deal. “As the ma­jor­ity lead­er said last year, the power of the purse is the ‘only tool’ Con­gress has to rein in ex­ec­ut­ive over­reach,” Her­it­age Ac­tion CEO Mi­chael Need­ham said in a state­ment.

“I think it is clear that the House has not agreed on a strategy yet,” Flake told re­port­ers.

For Demo­crats, the only way to pass a DHS bill is without amend­ments de­fund­ing Obama’s uni­lat­er­al ac­tions. “Sep­ar­a­tion’s im­port­ant,” Sen­ate Minor­ity Whip Dick Durbin said after the press con­fer­ence, “and the or­der if it’s go­ing to be ac­com­plished be­fore the dead­line really re­quires us to move to the fund­ing bill first.”

“If this is a clean fund­ing bill for the De­part­ment of Home­land Se­cur­ity, it’s go­ing to have a lot of Demo­crat­ic sup­port,” Durbin ad­ded.

The deal ap­peared to still be very del­ic­ate Tues­day af­ter­noon, however, when a seni­or GOP House aide ac­cused Demo­crats of de­mand­ing too much.

“Ap­par­ently in­spired by Pres­id­ent Obama’s own over­reach, Sen­at­or Re­id is now shame­lessly threat­en­ing to fili­buster a ‘clean’ Home­land Se­cur­ity fund­ing bill,” the aide said. “The Amer­ic­an people are watch­ing, and there will be con­sequences for Sen­ate Demo­crats’ hy­po­crisy and ir­re­spons­ib­il­ity.”

Demo­crats will need to agree to Mc­Con­nell’s new plan for the DHS fund­ing bill to move for­ward. The minor­ity—or at least six of its mem­bers—will have to agree to al­low the Sen­ate to take up the House-passed DHS bill, which Demo­crats have already voted down four times. The House bill cur­rently in­cludes sev­er­al amend­ments de­fund­ing Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions on im­mig­ra­tion from the past three years, but Mc­Con­nell has prom­ised that he would move to re­move them once Demo­crats agree to get on the bill.

If Demo­crats con­tin­ue to fili­buster the fund­ing bill, Mc­Con­nell said Tues­day he would bring up the im­mig­ra­tion meas­ure from Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, on Fri­day any­way.

“Every ex­cuse that they’ve had, we’ve now taken away, and they’re still ob­ject­ing,” Stew­art said.

This story is break­ing and will be up­dated.

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this story mis­labeled Sens. Harry Re­id and Mitch Mc­Con­nell. Mc­Con­nell is the Sen­ate ma­jor­ity lead­er, Re­id the Sen­ate minor­ity lead­er.

Contributions by Rachel Roubein

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.