Laura Ingraham: Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton Should Run on the Same Ticket

The conservative radio host threw considerable shade at Bush ahead of his CPAC speech.

Radio host Laura Ingraham speaks at the Freedom Summit at The Executive Court Banquet Facility April 12, 2014 in Manchester, New Hampshire.
National Journal
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
Emma Roller
Feb. 27, 2015, 4:10 a.m.

Jeb Bush will speak at the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence this af­ter­noon. But Laura In­gra­ham wasn’t go­ing to let him have an easy wel­come.

In her speech Fri­day morn­ing, the con­ser­vat­ive talk-show host opened with a warn­ing shot at Bush, ask­ing at­tendees to raise their hands if they were skep­tic­al of an­oth­er Bush pres­id­ency. The crowd ap­plauded.

“Jeb and Hil­lary could run on the same tick­et,” In­gra­ham con­tin­ued. “The idea that we should con­duct any kind of coron­a­tion … be­cause 50 rich fam­il­ies de­cide who will best de­cide their in­terests? No way, Jose.”

She went on to jab at Bush for a re­cent Wash­ing­ton Post story doc­u­ment­ing the plush spend­ing habits of his wife, Columba Bush. In­gra­ham joked that Bush’s mar­riage could help him ap­peal to wo­men voters. “What wo­man doesn’t love a man who gives her a blank check at Tiffany’s?” In­gra­ham said.

She also cri­ti­cized Bush for think­ing “the Amer­ic­an work­er is lazy” and that “we should re­pop­u­late De­troit with for­eign work­ers.”

In this way, In­gra­ham ex­pertly set the tone for the day at this large gath­er­ing of con­ser­vat­ives. That bore out later Fri­day morn­ing, when the crowd — largely made up of Rand Paul sup­port­ers ahead of his ap­pear­ance — loudly booed when Fox News‘ Sean Han­nity asked who in the crowd sup­por­ted Bush. Dur­ing her speech, In­gra­ham ap­pealed to the crowd while starkly re­mind­ing Bush that he won’t be able to simply show up and gain sup­port from the Re­pub­lic­an base.

“We don’t need a con­ser­vat­ive who comes to CPAC to check a box,” she said, say­ing that people come be­cause “they are con­ser­vat­ives.”

In­gra­ham also used her speech to bash me­dia out­lets that cri­ti­cized Gov. Scott Walk­er’s re­marks at CPAC on Thursday, in which he sug­ges­ted that tak­ing on thou­sands of pro-uni­on pro­test­ers in Wis­con­sin would pre­pare him for tak­ing on IS­IS. In­gra­ham said his crit­ics don’t have a sense of hu­mor.

Over­all, In­gra­ham gave per­haps the most full-throated de­fense of the con­ser­vat­ive move­ment at CPAC so far.

“For a mo­ment, don’t for­get where this move­ment came from. It came from men and wo­men who were told that con­ser­vat­ism was yes­ter­day’s news,” In­gra­ham said. “Con­ser­vat­ism is not dour or gloomy. We are an op­tim­ist­ic people. Don’t let any­one tell you oth­er­wise.”

This story was up­dated with de­tails from Sean Han­nity’s speech, and the re­sponse, later Fri­day morn­ing.

{{ BIZOBJ (slideshow: 890) }}

What We're Following See More »
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
18 minutes ago

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
3 hours ago

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
3 hours ago

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
19 hours ago

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
19 hours ago

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.