Obamacare Challengers Have Good Feeling After SCOTUS Arguments

A guard stands on the steps of the Supreme Court Building, August 20, 2014 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Dylan Scott
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dylan Scott
March 4, 2015, 7:41 a.m.

The two men who mas­ter­minded the latest leg­al chal­lenge that im­per­ils Obama­care were feel­ing pretty good about their chances after Wed­nes­day’s or­al ar­gu­ments at the Su­preme Court.

Mi­chael Can­non, a Cato In­sti­tute schol­ar, and Jonath­an Adler, a Case West­ern Uni­versity law pro­fess­or, sat in on the hear­ing.

“I’m op­tim­ist­ic be­cause the two swing justices were very skep­tic­al of the gov­ern­ment’s ar­gu­ment,” Can­non said.

Adler con­curred. “I think we saw today is that the gov­ern­ment’s ef­forts to make this a tex­tu­al case don’t seem to be ap­peal­ing to a ma­jor­ity of the Court,” he said, “and that the sorts of ar­gu­ments that could po­ten­tially sup­port the gov­ern­ment’s po­s­i­tion would pose grave risks to oth­er fed­er­al pro­grams.”

Chief Justice John Roberts didn’t say much dur­ing Wed­nes­day’s hear­ing, and Justice An­thony Kennedy was tough on both sides. He did seem con­cerned about the fed­er­al­ism im­plic­a­tions of a rul­ing in fa­vor of the plaintiffs, say­ing dur­ing the ar­gu­ment that it would raise “a ser­i­ous con­sti­tu­tion­al prob­lem.” Adler ac­know­ledged is one of the most dif­fi­cult is­sues for their side.

But he countered that he didn’t think the gov­ern­ment wanted to win on those grounds be­cause it would have un­cer­tain im­plic­a­tions bey­ond the Obama­care case.

“If the court were to say that those con­di­tions are co­er­cive, then that would not really be a vic­tory for the gov­ern­ment. That would be a vic­tory for lim­it­ing gov­ern­ment,” Can­non said. “Con­gress would not able to im­pose a lot of the bur­dens on states that it’s now im­pos­ing. It would over­turn Su­preme Court pre­ced­ents, and it would make a lot of fed­er­al pro­grams vul­ner­able to chal­lenge.”

As Adler put it: “It would in ef­fect save this IRS rule at the ex­pense of oth­er pro­grams.”

“I doubt the Court is will­ing to go that way,” he said, “but if it were to go that dir­ec­tion, I don’t think the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment would con­sider that a long-term vic­tory.”

Can­non and Adler really got the case rolling with a Ju­ly 2012 brief ar­guing that the In­tern­al Rev­en­ue Ser­vice had il­leg­ally au­thor­ized Obama­care’s tax cred­its in the 30-plus states that use the Health­Care.gov web­site. And after many had ini­tially dis­missed their ar­gu­ment as a strained at­tempt to gut the law, they got their day in front of the highest court in the land.

In the in­ter­im, they have been con­stant voices in sup­port of the case in me­dia and on­line and filed amicus briefs in sup­port of the plaintiffs. The New Re­pub­lic at one point dubbed Can­non “Obama­care’s Single Most Re­lent­less Ant­ag­on­ist.”

Sam Baker contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Russians Refer to "Verbal Agreements" with Trump
6 hours ago

"Two days after President Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, Russian officials offered a string of assertions about what the two leaders had achieved. 'Important verbal agreements' were reached at the Helsinki meeting, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, told reporters in Moscow Wednesday, including preservation of the New Start and INF agreements," and cooperation in Syria.

Trump Was Shown Proof of Russian Interference Before Inauguration
7 hours ago

"Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election. The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation. Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed."

Interior Department Inspector Opens Probe Into Zinke
11 hours ago

"The Interior Department’s internal watchdog has opened a formal investigation into a real estate deal involving a foundation established by Ryan Zinke and developers including Halliburton Chairman David Lesar, which was first reported by Politico, according to a letter sent to lawmakers Wednesday."

With Census Looming, Trump Nominates Director
11 hours ago

With preparations for the 2020 Census underway, President Trump has nominated a director of the agency. Steven Dillingham currently serves as director of the Office of Strategic Information, Research, and Planning at the Peace Corps. Previously, he served as Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Among his challenges will be navigating the thorny political issue of including a citizenship question on the survey.

Trump: High IQ People Loved the Putin Meeting
19 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.