Obamacare Challengers Have Good Feeling After SCOTUS Arguments

A guard stands on the steps of the Supreme Court Building, August 20, 2014 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Dylan Scott
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dylan Scott
March 4, 2015, 7:41 a.m.

The two men who mas­ter­minded the latest leg­al chal­lenge that im­per­ils Obama­care were feel­ing pretty good about their chances after Wed­nes­day’s or­al ar­gu­ments at the Su­preme Court.

Mi­chael Can­non, a Cato In­sti­tute schol­ar, and Jonath­an Adler, a Case West­ern Uni­versity law pro­fess­or, sat in on the hear­ing.

“I’m op­tim­ist­ic be­cause the two swing justices were very skep­tic­al of the gov­ern­ment’s ar­gu­ment,” Can­non said.

Adler con­curred. “I think we saw today is that the gov­ern­ment’s ef­forts to make this a tex­tu­al case don’t seem to be ap­peal­ing to a ma­jor­ity of the Court,” he said, “and that the sorts of ar­gu­ments that could po­ten­tially sup­port the gov­ern­ment’s po­s­i­tion would pose grave risks to oth­er fed­er­al pro­grams.”

Chief Justice John Roberts didn’t say much dur­ing Wed­nes­day’s hear­ing, and Justice An­thony Kennedy was tough on both sides. He did seem con­cerned about the fed­er­al­ism im­plic­a­tions of a rul­ing in fa­vor of the plaintiffs, say­ing dur­ing the ar­gu­ment that it would raise “a ser­i­ous con­sti­tu­tion­al prob­lem.” Adler ac­know­ledged is one of the most dif­fi­cult is­sues for their side.

But he countered that he didn’t think the gov­ern­ment wanted to win on those grounds be­cause it would have un­cer­tain im­plic­a­tions bey­ond the Obama­care case.

“If the court were to say that those con­di­tions are co­er­cive, then that would not really be a vic­tory for the gov­ern­ment. That would be a vic­tory for lim­it­ing gov­ern­ment,” Can­non said. “Con­gress would not able to im­pose a lot of the bur­dens on states that it’s now im­pos­ing. It would over­turn Su­preme Court pre­ced­ents, and it would make a lot of fed­er­al pro­grams vul­ner­able to chal­lenge.”

As Adler put it: “It would in ef­fect save this IRS rule at the ex­pense of oth­er pro­grams.”

“I doubt the Court is will­ing to go that way,” he said, “but if it were to go that dir­ec­tion, I don’t think the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment would con­sider that a long-term vic­tory.”

Can­non and Adler really got the case rolling with a Ju­ly 2012 brief ar­guing that the In­tern­al Rev­en­ue Ser­vice had il­leg­ally au­thor­ized Obama­care’s tax cred­its in the 30-plus states that use the Health­Care.gov web­site. And after many had ini­tially dis­missed their ar­gu­ment as a strained at­tempt to gut the law, they got their day in front of the highest court in the land.

In the in­ter­im, they have been con­stant voices in sup­port of the case in me­dia and on­line and filed amicus briefs in sup­port of the plaintiffs. The New Re­pub­lic at one point dubbed Can­non “Obama­care’s Single Most Re­lent­less Ant­ag­on­ist.”

Sam Baker contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CANCELS FLORIDA TRIP
Congress Heads Back to Work to End Shutdown
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate was expected to be back in session at noon, while House lawmakers were told to return to work for a 9 a.m. session. Mr. Trump on Friday had canceled plans to travel to his private resort on Palm Beach, Fla., where a celebration had been planned for Saturday to celebrate the anniversary of his first year in office."

Source:
CLOTURE FAILS
Government Shutdown Begins, as Senate Balks at Stopgap
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A stopgap spending bill stalled in the Senate Friday night, leading to a government shutdown for the first time since 2013. The continuing resolution funding agencies expired at midnight, and lawmakers were unable to spell out any path forward to keep government open. The Senate on Friday night failed to reach cloture on a four-week spending bill the House had already approved."

Source:
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS IN SUSPICIOUS CHECKS FLAGGED
Mueller’s Team Scrutinizing Russian Embassy Transactions
2 days ago
THE LATEST
PRO-TRUMP SPENDING COULD VIOLATE FECA
FBI Investigating Potential Russian Donations to NRA
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The FBI is investigating whether a top Russian banker with ties to the Kremlin illegally funneled money to the National Rifle Association to help Donald Trump win the presidency." Investigators have focused on Alexander Torshin, the deputy governor of Russia’s central bank "who is known for his close relationships with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and the NRA." The solicitation or use of foreign funds is illegal in U.S. elections under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) by either lobbying groups or political campaigns. The NRA reported spending a record $55 million on the 2016 elections.

Source:
DISCLOSURES MORE THAN DOUBLED
Mueller Investigation Leads to Hundreds of New FARA Filings
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Hundreds of new and supplemental FARA filings by U.S. lobbyists and public relations firms" have been submitted "since Special Counsel Mueller charged two Trump aides with failing to disclose their lobbying work on behalf of foreign countries. The number of first-time filings ... rose 50 percent to 102 between 2016 and 2017, an NBC News analysis found. The number of supplemental filings, which include details about campaign donations, meetings and phone calls more than doubled from 618 to 1,244 last year as lobbyists scrambled to avoid the same fate as some of Trump's associates and their business partners."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login