Heartland Monitor Poll

Some Americans Depend on Their Tax Refunds to Survive

The survey reveals that a majority of Americans plan to use their refunds to pay off debt or cover basic necessities.

Flickr/Got Credit
Janie Boschma
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Janie Boschma
March 16, 2015, 1:30 p.m.

Amer­ic­ans are gen­er­ally feel­ing more op­tim­ist­ic about the eco­nomy and their own fin­an­cial situ­ations, but many are re­ly­ing on sav­ings from this year’s tax re­funds and low gas prices to cov­er ba­sic ne­ces­sit­ies and pay off debt.

These find­ings from the latest All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll and fol­low-up in­ter­views with re­spond­ents re­flect the fact that while some seg­ments of the pop­u­la­tion have largely re­covered after the re­ces­sion, many are still strug­gling to cov­er their ex­penses and dig out from un­der years of debt—and see the sav­ings as a wel­come fin­an­cial cush­ion.

More than half of re­spond­ents said they ex­pect to re­ceive a tax re­fund this year. Of those, 82 per­cent said lower fuel prices have made a dif­fer­ence in im­prov­ing their fin­an­cial situ­ations. Thirty-sev­en per­cent of those ex­pect­ing a tax re­fund said they plan to use it to pay off debt, 29 per­cent would save or in­vest it, and 20 per­cent said the money would go to­ward cov­er­ing ba­sic ne­ces­sit­ies. Less than 10 per­cent said they’d spend the ex­tra money on something nice or fun.

De­cisions on how to spend that tax re­fund re­vealed stark con­trasts across race, in­come, and edu­ca­tion levels. While each demo­graph­ic pri­or­it­ized pay­ing off debt, only 36 per­cent of whites said they would use their re­fund to pay bills com­pared to 47 per­cent of black re­spond­ents and 43 per­cent of His­pan­ics. Whites were the most likely to save or in­vest their re­fund—30 per­cent re­por­ted those plans, nearly 10 per­cent­age points high­er than black and His­pan­ic adults. 

Col­lege-edu­cated mil­len­ni­als, many still shoul­der­ing long-term stu­dent loan debt, were the most likely to ex­pect a tax re­fund (74 per­cent). About 40 per­cent said they plan to put their re­fund to­ward pay­ing off loans, about the same share who would pay off debt among those without a col­lege de­gree between the ages of 18 and 64. Bailey Price, a col­lege gradu­ate from Lin­coln, Neb., used her tax re­fund to whittle down her out­stand­ing stu­dent loan debt, which she ex­pects to pay off with­in the next two to three years. Bey­ond debt, her tax re­turn al­lows her fam­ily a bit more free­dom in their budget.

“It’s giv­en us a little more wiggle room for cer­tain things that pop up like a friend’s baby shower, so we can ac­tu­ally af­ford a de­cent present for that, or re­cently we’ve had a couple things go wrong with our car and we were able to pull to­geth­er funds that we wouldn’t have had,” says Price. “It just al­lows us to catch our breath a little bit more.”

The share of adults sav­ing or in­vest­ing their re­fund also in­creased with each in­come brack­et, ran­ging from 20 per­cent of those earn­ing $30,000 or less to 40 per­cent of adults mak­ing $100,000 or more an­nu­ally. Adults with a four-year de­gree aged 40 and older were most likely to save or in­vest their re­funds and more likely to use their re­fund to buy something nice or fun (still only about 12 per­cent).

Adults over the age of 40 without a col­lege de­gree were the most likely group to use their re­fund to pay for ne­ces­sit­ies. Bar­bara Thomas, 58 from Ir­ri­gon, Ore., already spent her tax re­fund on med­ic­al bills from a re­cent sur­gery to re­move can­cer­ous melan­oma. Thomas works sea­son­ally in the fish­ing in­dustry and over the winter, she and her hus­band have tried to stretch his re­tire­ment in­come to cov­er both their reg­u­lar ex­penses and her doc­tor’s ap­point­ments. Any­thing ex­tra that comes their way—wheth­er her re­fund or fuel sav­ings—makes all the dif­fer­ence.

“It just makes it a lot easi­er to make ends meet,” Thomas said. “Liv­ing on so­cial se­cur­ity is tough.”

About three-quar­ters of re­spond­ents re­por­ted sav­ing money from low gas prices re­cently. Just un­der one-third said they’re us­ing those sav­ings to cov­er ne­ces­sit­ies, 27 per­cent are pay­ing off debt or buy­ing less on cred­it, and 19 per­cent are sav­ing or in­vest­ing the dif­fer­ence. Less than 10 per­cent said they are either driv­ing more or buy­ing lux­ury items with their fuel sav­ings.

The im­pact of a lower gas price fol­lowed sim­il­ar pat­terns along ra­cial, in­come, and edu­ca­tion lines. Minor­ity re­spond­ents were more likely to re­port sav­ings at the pump hav­ing a “huge or sig­ni­fic­ant” fin­an­cial im­pact, with 38 per­cent and 35 per­cent of His­pan­ic and black re­spond­ents, re­spect­ively, com­pared to 30 per­cent of whites.

Sean Adams, a 23-year-old Afric­an-Amer­ic­an who works for the gov­ern­ment near Vir­gin­ia Beach, Vir­gin­ia, said lower gas prices have made a huge dif­fer­ence for his budget. He’s used the sav­ings to pay off bills and buy ne­ces­sit­ies he put off while the fuel price was so high and filling his tank trumped oth­er ex­penses.

“You shouldn’t be mak­ing life de­cisions at the pump,” says Adams, “but you do what you have to do. You have to get to work.”

Par­ents with school-aged chil­dren were more likely to feel the im­pact of cheap­er fuel (62 per­cent), com­pared to par­ents with adult chil­dren (50 per­cent) and non-par­ents (54 per­cent).

Kim­berly McDaniel, a nurs­ing stu­dent from Nacog­doches, Texas, says lower gas prices have cut her monthly fuel bill by more than half. She had been spend­ing about $300 monthly to com­mute to med­ic­al school and to pick up her kids at school; now she only spends about $120.

A di­vorced moth­er of three, McDaniel says she’s used her tax re­fund and fuel sav­ings to help provide for her chil­dren, and pay off her mort­gage and car pay­ments while she’s study­ing full-time.

“I’m ba­sic­ally hav­ing to use that to pay bills and everything to make it through,” she says. “There’s no ex­tra spend­ing go­ing on right now. In a nor­mal situ­ation if I were still work­ing and not go­ing to school, we would have more money to spend money on oth­er things, like go­ing to the movies or tak­ing them skat­ing.”

The latest All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll is the 22nd in a series ex­amin­ing how Amer­ic­ans are ex­per­i­en­cing the chan­ging eco­nomy. This poll, which ex­plored how Amer­ic­ans rate con­di­tions in their com­munit­ies and wheth­er they prefer loc­al or na­tion­al in­sti­tu­tions to take the lead in re­spond­ing to the coun­try’s chal­lenges, sur­veyed 1,000 adults by land­line and cell phones from Feb. 18 through 22, 2015. The sur­vey has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.1 per­cent­age points. The sur­vey was su­per­vised by Ed Re­illy and Jeremy Ruch of FTI Con­sult­ing’s Stra­tegic Com­mu­nic­a­tions prac­tice.

What We're Following See More »
White House Adds Five New SCOTUS Candidates
5 hours ago

President Trump added five new names to his Supreme Court short list on Friday, should a need arise to appoint a new justice. The list now numbers 25 individuals. They are: 7th Circuit Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt C. Grant, District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, 11th Circuit Appeals Judge Kevin C. Newsom, and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.

Sessions: DOJ Will No Longer Issue Guidance Documents
5 hours ago

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”

Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
7 hours ago
Steele Says Follow the Money
8 hours ago

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
8 hours ago

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.