‘Doc Fix’ Deal Still Has A Long Way To Go

House leaders will try to sell a deal to the their members, but they face roadblocks from industry, conservatives, liberals and the Senate.

National Journal
Sam Baker and Dylan Scott
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sam Baker Dylan Scott
March 16, 2015, 2:57 p.m.

House Speak­er John Boehner and Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi are close to an agree­ment on the sub­stance of a per­man­ent “doc fix”—but they’re still scram­bling to sell the plan to skep­tics in their own caucuses, the health care in­dustry, and the Sen­ate.

The lead­ers are fight­ing in­tense polit­ic­al battles aimed at both keep­ing prom­in­ent groups such as the AARP and Her­it­age Ac­tion on the side­lines while carving out a wide enough middle ground in the House to pass a bill cer­tain to ali­en­ate par­tis­ans on both sides.

“I think it’s go­ing to be a pretty tricky bal­an­cing act,” said Dan Ad­cock, dir­ect­or of gov­ern­ment re­la­tions and policy at the Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee to Pre­serve So­cial Se­cur­ity and Medi­care.

The plan, which Boehner is ex­pec­ted to pitch to his caucus Tues­day, would re­place Medi­care’s pay­ment for­mula for doc­tors, which has be­come a per­en­ni­al—and ex­pens­ive—an­noy­ance for law­makers and doc­tors alike. If they can­not come to an agree­ment by the end of the month, law­makers will need to pass yet an­oth­er short-term patch, at a cost of roughly $20 bil­lion, to pre­vent a cut of more than 20 per­cent in doc­tors’ Medi­care pay­ments.

(RE­LATED: Get Ex­cited, Every­one. It’s “Doc Fix” Time)

Demo­crats have con­sist­ently hammered Re­pub­lic­ans over pro­posed cuts in Medi­care be­ne­fits, but aides are now press­ing groups like Ad­cock’s—as well as AARP, the power­house seni­ors’ lobby—not to op­pose the doc fix deal, even though it in­cludes at least two pro­vi­sions that would pass more health care costs on to seni­ors.

“They want every­body to give this deal a chance. They’re say­ing it’s bet­ter to do this now rather than fight it dur­ing budget re­con­cili­ation. Or if we wait, the cost of the doc fix will be high­er. Those are the kinds of things they’re pitch­ing on,” Ad­cock said. “That is what they’re say­ing: ‘If you can’t sup­port it, don’t op­pose it.’ But their primary mes­sage is that people should with­hold judg­ment un­til they see the fi­nal deal.”

On the right, Boehner and his al­lies are try­ing to quell con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers’ skep­ti­cism. The con­ser­vat­ive ad­vocacy group Her­it­age Ac­tion came out swinging against the doc fix pro­pos­al, angry that Boehner had star­ted off by ne­go­ti­at­ing with Pelosi and frus­trated that the bulk of the pack­age — about $130 bil­lion—would not be paid for un­der the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice’s nor­mal 10-year win­dow.

Boehner is lean­ing in­stead on strong sup­port from Amer­ic­ans for Tax Re­form, the anti-tax group headed by Grover Nor­quist.

(RE­LATED: Boehner’s New Strategy: En­list Demo­crats First, Not Last)

Ry­an El­lis, ATR’s tax policy dir­ect­or, said CBO is ex­pec­ted to re­lease a let­ter Tues­day cla­ri­fy­ing that, while the doc fix deal might not re­duce the de­fi­cit over the next 10 years, it would lead to con­sid­er­able sav­ings in the long run.

ATR and Her­it­age Ac­tion made their com­pet­ing pitches Monday to a group of con­ser­vat­ive staffers, where El­lis en­cour­aged them not to worry about the 10-year budget win­dow.

“I could care less about the 10 years. It’s en­ti­tle­ment re­form,” El­lis said. “You would nev­er meas­ure en­ti­tle­ment re­form in a 10-year win­dow.”

El­lis said ATR has come to the bill’s de­fense so ag­gress­ively in part be­cause Her­it­age Ac­tion came out so strong with its ar­gu­ment that the bill isn’t paid for. “That’s kind of forced us to push an al­tern­at­ive nar­rat­ive here,” he said.

Aides are mak­ing a sim­il­ar pitch to health care in­dus­tries, ac­cord­ing to lob­by­ists fol­low­ing the is­sue.

On the policy mer­its, the Amer­ic­an Med­ic­al As­so­ci­ation has en­dorsed a per­man­ent doc fix re­peatedly—it’s the group’s biggest pri­or­ity by far, and it’s put­ting to­geth­er a broad co­ali­tion of phys­i­cian groups to sup­port the meas­ure Boehner and Pelosi are craft­ing.

Law­makers might have a harder time with hos­pit­als, which would ab­sorb a sig­ni­fic­ant share of the bill’s pro­vider cuts. A spokes­wo­man for the Amer­ic­an Hos­pit­al As­so­ci­ation de­clined to com­ment on the emer­ging frame­work Monday.

(RE­LATED: How Re­pub­lic­ans Could Blow the Budget)

But cuts to pay for a short-term patch could also come from hos­pit­als, mak­ing it a ques­tion of how much the in­dustry would have to ab­sorb now, versus the costs it would in­cur over time if Con­gress can’t break the pat­tern of short-term doc fixes.

The frame­work es­sen­tially treats the doc fix it­self as the ve­get­ables that Con­gress needs, with sweeten­ers for each side. There’s already a bi­par­tis­an, bicam­er­al agree­ment on the spe­cif­ic plan to re­place Medi­care’s pay­ment for­mula, but pre­vi­ous at­tempts at a per­man­ent fix have broken down over dis­agree­ments about how to off­set the cost.

Un­der the emer­ging Boehner-Pelosi agree­ment, those costs wouldn’t be off­set with­in CBO’s tra­di­tion­al 10-year win­dow, but both parties would swal­low some policies they don’t like in or­der to get the doc fix through.

Re­pub­lic­ans would agree to a two-year CHIP ex­ten­sion at fund­ing levels set in the Af­ford­able Care Act, while Demo­crats would give up two Medi­care be­ne­fit cuts: in­creased cost-shar­ing in parts of the pro­gram, and a policy re­quir­ing sup­ple­ment­al Medigap plans to carry a co-pay.

It’s not clear yet wheth­er Boehner and Pelosi can shep­herd that deal through their cham­ber—one lob­by­ist gave it a 50-50 chance. It would be a big lift in a short time frame, and no one in­volved in the pro­cess seems to have any idea wheth­er the Sen­ate would ac­cept the House deal.

Some Sen­ate Demo­crats have already in­dic­ated that they want a four-year CHIP ex­ten­sion, and the par­tis­an pres­sures at play in the House will play out in the up­per cham­ber, too—hard­line con­ser­vat­ives likely would ob­ject to the bill’s off­sets, while hard­line lib­er­als could res­ist en­ti­tle­ment cuts in ad­di­tion to lob­by­ing for a bet­ter deal on CHIP, which doesn’t ac­tu­ally need to be reau­thor­ized un­til Septem­ber.

In short, lead­ers from both parties, in both cham­bers, have about two weeks to fig­ure out a policy agree­ment that keeps hos­pit­als quiet, keeps AARP quiet, still makes doc­tors happy, and that can pass with bi­par­tis­an sup­port. If they can’t, they’ll have to re­vert to an­oth­er short-term patch—the 18th tem­por­ary fix—and the quest for a per­man­ent bill will start over in a few months.

What We're Following See More »
McConnell Pulls Nomination of Circuit Court Judge
1 hours ago
Trump Backtracks on Putin's "Incredible Offer"
1 hours ago
White House Planning Putin Visit To D.C.
2 hours ago
White House Seeks to Roll Back Endangered Species Rules
5 hours ago
Trump Throws Shade at the Fed
5 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.