Kentucky Series

Manual Labor, All Night Long: The Reality of Paying for College

A UPS program in Louisville gives students free tuition for working the third shift, but at what cost?

March 25, 2015, 7:52 a.m.

LOUIS­VILLE, Ky.—Most col­lege stu­dents are busy. But Alex­is McLin’s sched­ule is even more jam-packed than the av­er­age stu­dent’s.

One day earli­er this month, for in­stance, she at­ten­ded a lab from 3 p.m. to 6:45, went to din­ner with her moth­er, and then at mid­night went in to work at UPS, where she sorts pack­ages from mid­night to 4:30 a.m.

McLin, 21, is train­ing to be a teach­er, and so after she got off work and had some break­fast, she drove to an ele­ment­ary school at 7:40 a.m to ob­serve classes for four hours. That af­ter­noon, she at­ten­ded a par­ent-teach­er con­fer­ence, cap­ping off more than 24 straight hours of work and school with no sleep.

It wasn’t an un­usu­al day for McLin, who is at­tend­ing the Uni­versity of Louis­ville for free through a pro­gram that pays her tu­ition if she works the overnight shift at UPS and keeps her grades above a “C.” The pro­gram, called Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege, has been held up as a mod­el of a pub­lic-private part­ner­ship, help­ing stu­dents pay for school while filling holes in the work­force.

In­deed, McLin, a chip­per red­head whom I in­ter­viewed at the UPS fa­cil­ity at 2:00 in the morn­ing last week, told me this was the only way she could at­tend col­lege, be­cause her fam­ily can’t af­ford the tu­ition. But even her fam­ily is in­cred­u­lous at the hours she keeps. She works five nights a week at UPS from mid­night un­til 4:30 a.m., and still finds time to go to classes, par­ti­cip­ate in col­or guard, and ful­fill stu­dent-teach­ing re­spons­ib­il­it­ies.

“It was really hard in the be­gin­ning, but I got used to it,” the ju­ni­or told me. “I’ve be­come more re­spons­ible and more or­gan­ized with my time.”

Tour the UPS fa­cil­ity between mid­night and 4 a.m. Monday through Fri­day and you’ll see many stu­dents like McLin sort­ing mail en­vel­opes, drag­ging heavy con­tain­ers full of pack­ages to and from air­planes, and un­load­ing carts of mail onto con­vey­or belts, 155 miles of which chug around the fa­cil­ity. Of the 6,000 people work­ing there on any giv­en night shift, about 2,000 are in the Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege pro­gram, which gives in-state tu­ition to the night-shift work­ers to at­tend either the Uni­versity of Louis­ville or Jef­fer­son Com­munity and Tech­nic­al Col­lege dur­ing the day. (Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege isn’t a uni­versity it­self, just the name of the pro­gram.)

The pro­gram was cre­ated in the late 1990s after UPS had trouble with turnover: In a boom­ing eco­nomy, at the wages it was pay­ing, the com­pany couldn’t keep work­ers on the night shift for more than a month or two. It was also hav­ing labor prob­lems: In 1997, the Team­sters held a 15-day strike at UPS de­mand­ing more part-time jobs and high­er wages at the com­pany. (Stu­dent work­ers now make $10 an hour, but when the pro­gram star­ted, they made $8.50.)

When UPS threatened to loc­ate an ex­pan­sion of its busy air hub else­where, state and city lead­ers held an emer­gency meet­ing to come up with an idea for re­tain­ing work­ers. Their pro­pos­al: City gov­ern­ment would pay half of stu­dents’ tu­ition, UPS the oth­er half. To­geth­er, the full-tu­ition be­ne­fit would be enough to keep night-shift work­ers on the rolls. Since then, turnover on the night shift has dropped from 70 per­cent to 20 per­cent an­nu­ally, and 14,000 stu­dents have worked at UPS while at­tend­ing school.

“It’s a win-win be­cause it has sta­bil­ized our work­force con­sid­er­ably, and the com­mon­wealth gets a much bet­ter-edu­cated work­force,” Mike Mangeot, a UPS spokes­man, told me as we drove around the busy air­port—the largest auto­mated pack­age-hand­ling fa­cil­ity in the world—at 3 a.m.

It’s not just tu­ition: Stu­dents also re­ceive be­ne­fits such as health in­sur­ance, and they are paid bo­nuses for fin­ish­ing col­lege and the semester. They also get coun­sel­ing to help them juggle their re­spons­ib­il­it­ies, and many stu­dents end up work­ing their way up the cor­por­ate lad­der at UPS after they gradu­ate. (They’re also paid for the hours they work.)

But as I walked through the long rows of stu­dents push­ing en­vel­opes to con­vey­or belts and in­to the open air where teen­agers pulled cargo off jet planes, I wondered if the sys­tem really is win-win. I was hav­ing trouble stay­ing awake and alert as we got closer and closer to dawn, and I couldn’t ima­gine be­ing able to fo­cus on home­work or col­lege lec­tures later on in the day.

The UPS/Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege mod­el helps stu­dents pay for col­lege, and for that it should be lauded. But can col­lege stu­dents really work the night shift five nights a week and stay alert enough at school to un­der­stand what was hap­pen­ing in their classes? In the richest coun­try in the world, shouldn’t there be a less hellish way to fin­ance a col­lege dip­loma?

* * *

For the first 200 or so years after Har­vard, the first col­lege in Amer­ica, was foun­ded in 1636, stu­dents either stud­ied the clas­sics or tech­nic­al top­ics such as sci­ence or ag­ri­cul­ture. But in the mid-1800s, lead­ers of schools in­clud­ing Har­vard and Yale, con­cerned that wealthy fam­il­ies were start­ing to see col­lege as use­less, began to em­brace a cur­riculum that both pre­pared stu­dents for the work­ing world and gave them a broad edu­ca­tion in a num­ber of top­ics. In 1869, Charles W. Eli­ot, who was soon ap­poin­ted pres­id­ent of Har­vard, laid out his vis­ion for what he called “a prac­tic­al edu­ca­tion” in a piece in The At­lantic.

“The fact is, that the whole tone and spir­it of a good col­lege ought to be dif­fer­ent in kind from that of a good poly­tech­nic or sci­entif­ic school,” he wrote. “In the col­lege, the de­sire for the broad­est cul­ture, for the best form­a­tion and in­form­a­tion of the mind, the en­thu­si­ast­ic study of sub­jects for the love of them without any ul­teri­or ob­jects, the love of learn­ing and re­search for their own sake, should be the dom­in­ant ideas,” he wrote.

Eli­ot spent much of the next 40 years mak­ing Har­vard in­to a place where stu­dents could get a “prac­tic­al edu­ca­tion,” which com­bined ex­plor­a­tion and ab­stract learn­ing with the ac­quis­i­tion of use­ful skills.

At the time, a col­lege edu­ca­tion was ac­cess­ible only to the most elite: In 1940, only 6 per­cent of males had com­pleted four years of col­lege, ac­cord­ing to the Na­tion­al Cen­ter for Edu­ca­tion­al Stat­ist­ics; few­er than half of Amer­ic­ans had fin­ished eighth grade.

But col­lege at­tain­ment rates began to grow stead­ily after World War II, when the G.I. Bill sent mil­lions of re­turn­ing sol­diers to col­lege and helped pro­mote a more demo­crat­ic no­tion of who could get a col­lege de­gree. (It is im­port­ant to note, however, that the ef­fects of the G.I. Bill did not fall equally among all Amer­ic­ans, and many black vet­er­ans, par­tic­u­larly in the South, did not be­ne­fit at all.) Col­lege com­ple­tion rates rose from 6 per­cent of males to 12 per­cent by 1962. Wo­men and minor­it­ies began to at­tend col­lege in great­er num­bers, too. These trends ac­cel­er­ated in the later part of the 20th cen­tury and the early 21st: Col­lege en­roll­ment climbed from 25 per­cent of 18-to-24-year-olds in 1967 to 41 per­cent in 2012.

But as more stu­dents began at­tend­ing col­lege, the new in­sti­tu­tions that sprang up to edu­cate stu­dents didn’t have the en­dow­ments of the older schools. And as col­leges began to com­pete against one an­oth­er to at­tract stu­dents and fac­ulty, they star­ted spend­ing more money on things like sports teams, new build­ings, and per­son­nel. Tu­ition and fees have gone up 1,120 per­cent since 1978 alone, ac­cord­ing to Bloomberg.

Today, af­ford­ab­il­ity is the biggest chal­lenge to stu­dents’ abil­ity to go to col­lege. And as stu­dents struggle with how to pay for school, many are find­ing they don’t have as much time for—let alone want to spend their lim­ited money on—”learn­ing and re­search for their own sake.” Fear­ing the specter of loans hanging over them forever, many stu­dents try to fin­ish col­lege as quickly as pos­sible, live at home, and work one or two jobs dur­ing school to save money. Their main con­cerns aren’t wheth­er they have time to take all of the fas­cin­at­ing and var­ied classes in the course cata­log, but in­stead how they can get all their cred­it hours without go­ing so deep in­to debt that they’ll nev­er es­cape. Though they’ve been told that a col­lege edu­ca­tion is what they need to suc­ceed in Amer­ica, the stress of pay­ing for that edu­ca­tion chal­lenges their abil­ity to be­ne­fit from it.

In 2011, about 71 per­cent of un­der­gradu­ates worked while en­rolled in col­lege, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent census re­port. And they’re work­ing more hours, rather than few­er, ac­cord­ing to the Na­tion­al Cen­ter for Edu­ca­tion Stat­ist­ics. The share of stu­dents work­ing few­er than 20 hours per week has de­clined, to about 15 per­cent in 2007, while the per­cent­age of those work­ing between 20 and 34 hours in­creased to 21 per­cent.

Work­ing a low num­ber of hours—say, less than 15—can be be­ne­fi­cial to a stu­dent, es­pe­cially if that job is on cam­pus, said Laura Per­na, a pro­fess­or at Penn’s Gradu­ate School of Edu­ca­tion who is also the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Al­li­ance for High­er Edu­ca­tion and Demo­cracy. A job on cam­pus provides an­oth­er way for the stu­dent to be in­teg­rated in­to the cam­pus, and it is usu­ally flex­ible so that a stu­dent can take whatever classes he or she wants, or work less dur­ing ex­am peri­ods.

But work­ing more than 15 or so hours can be det­ri­ment­al to a stu­dent’s aca­dem­ic per­form­ance, she said.

“It’s of­ten very dif­fi­cult for stu­dents, with the stress of try­ing to man­age mul­tiple re­spons­ib­il­it­ies,” she said. “The fact that there’s only so many hours in a day—when you’re al­loc­at­ing a cer­tain num­ber of hours to paid em­ploy­ment, the en­ergy you have to be en­gaged with your aca­dem­ic re­quire­ments de­clines.”

Work­ing all night can be chal­len­ging for stu­dents, es­pe­cially those who have early-morn­ing classes or ex­ams. A study pub­lished last year in the Journ­al of Nature and Sci­ence of Sleep found that sleep depriva­tion and day­time sleep­i­ness in col­lege stu­dents can res­ult in lower grade point av­er­ages, in­creased risk of aca­dem­ic fail­ure, and im­paired mood. Sub­jects who were tested after 35 hours of sleep depriva­tion, for ex­ample, saw scores drop two let­ter grades when com­pared with non-sleep-de­prived sub­jects. Stu­dents who slept for nine hours a night or more had much high­er GPAs than those who slept for few­er than six hours a night.

It’s not just the phys­ic­al strain of sleep depriva­tion that af­fects stu­dents. When stu­dents are so over­worked, Per­na said, they aren’t able to spend as much time pay­ing at­ten­tion to learn­ing, and to en­joy­ing the learn­ing ex­per­i­ence. In­deed, none of the stu­dents I saw at the UPS cen­ter were likely spend­ing many late nights cram­ming for ex­ams with friends, or talk­ing about lit­er­at­ure with people they’d just met, or tak­ing ex­tra time on a sci­ence ex­per­i­ment, just be­cause they found it in­ter­est­ing.

In­stead, many of the stu­dents have to plan every minute of their day to squeeze in work, sleep, classes, and home­work.

“When you’re try­ing to sim­ul­tan­eously hold down a job and stay en­rolled and make sat­is­fact­ory aca­dem­ic pro­gress, there can be an ab­sence of at­ten­tion to the en­joy­ment of the learn­ing ex­per­i­ence,” Per­na said.

Still, some stu­dents don’t mind trad­ing that “en­joy­ment of the learn­ing ex­per­i­ence” for an ab­sence of loans. Tori Zie­g­ler star­ted out at­tend­ing the Uni­versity of Ken­tucky and liv­ing in the dorms. By the end of her first semester, though, Zie­g­ler began to worry about the size of the loans she was tak­ing out, and how she was go­ing to pay them back. She trans­ferred to the Uni­versity of Louis­ville and Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege and star­ted work­ing as a sort­er on the night shift at UPS.

“I wasn’t go­ing to be able to fin­ish school if I didn’t find some way to get it paid for,” she told me.

Sort­ing is tough work—in some jobs, you stand between lines of quick-mov­ing con­vey­or belts as mail chugs down a chute, when the par­cels reach you, you move them in­to com­part­ments on the con­vey­or belt as quickly as you can. In oth­er jobs, you take the mail that’s fallen in­to a bag destined for, say, Lin­coln, Neb­raska, zip up those bags and load them onto a con­tain­er bound for an air­plane. In the sum­mer, the sort­ing area, loc­ated atop the floors and floors of auto­mated ma­chinery at UPS, can get in­cred­ibly hot, stu­dents told me.

“It’s manu­al labor, def­in­itely,” Zie­g­ler said. “At first, it was a big ad­just­ment, I was sore and tired. But I knew it was the only way I was go­ing to get to go to school.”

When in school, Zie­g­ler said, her plan­ner was her best friend—she’d write down everything she had to do dur­ing the week and plan every minute. Some days, if she got be­hind on home­work, she’d try to fin­ish it when she got off work, around 6 in the morn­ing, and then sleep for a couple hours be­fore do­ing it all again.

She had to show up at work, but she also had to do well at school: If stu­dents get be­low a “C” they have to re­pay UPS the tu­ition for that class. But Zie­g­ler said she was mo­tiv­ated to make the UPS pro­gram work.

“Both of my par­ents were pretty adam­ant—do this, so you can do bet­ter than we did,” she told me (neither of her par­ents gradu­ated from col­lege). “I knew that I had to do it, but there were times I thought I would nev­er make it.”

Zie­g­ler worked the night shift for the rest of col­lege, and fin­ished in Decem­ber with a de­gree in so­ci­ology. Soon after, a job at UPS in the HR de­part­ment opened up, and she now works for the HR de­part­ment from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m., five days a week.

She doesn’t re­gret miss­ing the “col­lege ex­per­i­ence,” she told me; she pre­ferred liv­ing at home to liv­ing in the dorms, and liked so­cial­iz­ing with the people she met at UPS more than those at school.

But Zie­g­ler’s school ex­per­i­ence was vastly dif­fer­ent than the lib­er­al-arts edu­ca­tion that Charles Eli­ot en­vi­sioned in his At­lantic art­icle and that has been held up as a mod­el of Amer­ic­an edu­ca­tion for more than a cen­tury. In­deed, Eli­ot wrote that in or­der to get a good edu­ca­tion, stu­dents shouldn’t work manu­al labor while en­rolled.

Re­fer­ring to the Rens­selaer Poly­tech­nic In­sti­tute, which at the time had stu­dents per­form manu­al labor, Eli­ot wrote that “the ex­per­i­ment of mak­ing manu­al labor a part of the reg­u­lar cur­riculum has been tried, and has failed.” Young chil­dren may be able to work in factor­ies for half a day and then learn to read and write, Eli­ot ar­gued, but for ad­vanced in­struc­tion, stu­dents need more time for in­tel­lec­tu­al pur­suits.

“To be sure, a young man can­not read and write 14 hours a day; but when he can­not be study­ing books he can be catch­ing but­ter­flies, hunt­ing for flowers and stones, ex­per­i­ment­ing in a chem­ic­al labor­at­ory, prac­ti­cing mech­an­ic­al draw­ing, sharpen­ing his wits in con­verse with bright as­so­ci­ates, or learn­ing man­ners in ladies’ so­ci­ety,” he wrote. “Any of these oc­cu­pa­tions is much bet­ter for him than dig­ging pota­toes, saw­ing wood, lay­ing brick, or set­ting type.”

* * *

While I was in Ken­tucky, I also vis­ited Berea Col­lege, set in a bu­col­ic small town in the east­ern part of the state. Foun­ded in 1855 as the first coed, non­segreg­ated school in the South, Berea is a “work col­lege”: It provides its stu­dents free tu­ition, and, in ex­change, they must work on cam­pus for 10 to 15 hours a week.

Berea is one of just sev­en “work col­leges” in the United States. Many, like Berea, provide free or re­duced tu­ition in ex­change for work. All try to in­cor­por­ate that work ex­per­i­ence in­to a stu­dent’s aca­dem­ic life, so that stu­dents don’t have to sac­ri­fice their edu­ca­tion to earn money.

Loc­ated on the edge of Ap­palachia, Berea serves many low-in­come stu­dents who would have had to take out large loans to at­tend col­lege at all (99 per­cent of first-year stu­dents are eli­gible for Pell Grants). The jobs as­signed to stu­dents vary from serving food in the din­ing halls to work­ing in the pub­lic-re­la­tions of­fice of the school, and are lim­ited to 10 to 15 hours a week.

I talked to Brit­tany Kenyon and Lisa Rivera, a fresh­man and a sopho­more com­ing out of one of Berea’s pic­tur­esque brick dorms on a re­cent weeknight: Kenyon works clean­ing the dorms; Rivera works for din­ing ser­vices. Both said they’d chosen Berea in part be­cause they wouldn’t have to take out loans. But they’re get­ting a good edu­ca­tion, too. Work nev­er gets in the way of school, they told me.

“They sched­ule you around your classes here,” Kenyon told me. “The classes come first, if you have an hour here, and hour there, that’s when you work.”

The free­dom of not hav­ing to pay for school has al­lowed some stu­dents to use their time to in­vest in the com­munity. One stu­dent I talked to, Eth­an Ham­blin, was able to work for a found­a­tion that en­cour­aged grass­roots phil­an­thropy in Ap­palachia. He is still em­ployed there today, al­though he has gradu­ated.

The work-col­lege mod­el is lauded by both stu­dents and edu­ca­tion ad­voc­ates, but it’s not prac­tic­al for most uni­versit­ies. Berea, for in­stance, has a hefty $1 bil­lion en­dow­ment.

But some schools are try­ing to use the work-col­lege mod­el to make tu­ition more af­ford­able. Paul Quinn Col­lege, a private lib­er­al-arts in­sti­tu­tion in Texas that serves minor­it­ies, re­cently an­nounced that it was launch­ing what it’s call­ing a “New Urb­an Col­lege Mod­el” that will in­teg­rate work in­to stu­dents’ col­lege ex­per­i­ence as a way to re­duce tu­ition costs.

The school launched the pro­gram be­cause many of its stu­dents were strug­gling with how to pay for school, Mi­chael Sor­rell, the col­lege’s pres­id­ent, told me. Be­gin­ning this fall, stu­dents will spend some time work­ing for the school for their first two years, and then will work for com­pan­ies out­side of the uni­versity for their second two years. Stu­dents will not work more than 20 hours a week, he told me. With Pell Grants and the work cred­it, stu­dents should only have to pay a few thou­sand dol­lars a semester, he said, down from the $23,850 in tu­ition the school had been char­ging.

Sor­rel wants his stu­dents to still be able to get a lib­er­al-arts edu­ca­tion. But help­ing them or­gan­ize their work ex­per­i­ence through col­lege will al­low them to do that, while still pay­ing for col­lege, he said. “If your stu­dents are already work­ing, and you don’t help them, then they’re go­ing to get whatever jobs they can, and those jobs aren’t al­ways com­pat­ible with their classes.”

I hadn’t men­tioned UPS when we talked, but Sor­rell brought up the prob­lem of stu­dents tak­ing night-shift work without my prompt­ing. Be­fore start­ing this pro­gram, he said, many of the stu­dents at Paul Quinn found jobs at a Fe­d­Ex fa­cil­ity nearby, work­ing the mid­night shift. They of­ten struggled to stay up for the night shift and achieve aca­dem­ic­ally.

“If you get off work at 3, 4 a.m., you’re not go­ing to your 8 a.m. class,” he said. “And if you go to the 8 a.m. class, you’re not really there.”

“It should nev­er have been defined as either/or,” he said. “I don’t think stu­dents are well-served not be­ing giv­en an op­por­tun­ity to fo­cus on learn­ing. “Where we’ve gone wrong, Sor­rell, said, is mak­ing stu­dents feel like they have to chose between a lib­er­al-arts edu­ca­tion and an af­ford­able edu­ca­tion that also pre­pares them for the real world. He’s hop­ing that Paul Quinn’s pro­gram will al­low them to do both.

* * *

It’s easy to pick on Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege and the bar­gain Louis­ville struck with UPS. After all, UPS wasn’t pay­ing people enough to stay in part-time jobs, so it got Louis­ville to pitch in a sub­sidy to make those jobs at­tract­ive to low-in­come people who wanted to go to col­lege.

But it also could be ar­gued that the more op­tions stu­dents have in pay­ing for col­lege, the bet­ter. Just 11 per­cent of low-in­come stu­dents who are first in their fam­ily to at­tend col­lege will have a de­gree six years after en­rolling, be­cause of the many chal­lenges, fin­an­cial and aca­dem­ic, that they face. And while it might have once been pos­sible for stu­dents to work their way through col­lege on grit alone, tu­ition has ris­en so much faster than the min­im­um wage that a stu­dent would now have to work 991 hours to pay for one year of pub­lic uni­versity tu­ition, one study found.

Un­til we find a way to make col­lege more af­ford­able, it can’t hurt to give stu­dents more ways to pay for col­lege. As long as they know they have op­tions. Stu­dents should be aware that they can take out loans and not work dur­ing school, Per­na told me, or that they can get a job and work and study throughout. They should know that there are Pell Grants avail­able and state loans, in some cases. They should know there are pro­grams such as Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege, but also that they don’t have to do them to go to school.

I wondered how much choice theh stu­dents en­rolled in Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege felt they had: The city would pay half of their col­lege tu­ition if they pledged to work for UPS, but, oth­er­wise, they were on their own. A friend who grew up in Louis­ville joked to me that stu­dents there have two choices to get a free ride to col­lege: work the night shift at UPS or “get shot at,” by join­ing the mil­it­ary.

But then I talked to Ilya Ly­al­in, now 26, who worked for UPS dur­ing a few years of col­lege. He wouldn’t have been able to at­tend school without Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege: His par­ents, Rus­si­an im­mig­rants, told him after his first year of low grades at Jef­fer­son Com­munity and Tech­nic­al Col­lege that they wer­en’t go­ing to pay for school any­more, and that he should drop out and get a job.

“I ba­sic­ally had an op­tion of either leav­ing school or go­ing to UPS and work­ing there and stay­ing in school,” he told me.

He thought ser­i­ously about drop­ping out, but a few friends were do­ing Met­ro­pol­it­an Col­lege, so he ap­plied and star­ted work­ing as a load­er, tak­ing pack­ages off a con­vey­or belt and stack­ing them in con­tain­ers. When Ly­al­in star­ted work­ing in the sum­mer, it was hor­rible, he said. He stayed up all night in the heat to load pack­ages while su­per­visors har­angued him to move faster. Once school star­ted again, it was even worse. His friends would be hanging out, and he’d have to leave and go to work. It got worse when he trans­ferred to the Uni­versity of Louis­ville, which had much more of a tra­di­tion­al col­lege at­mo­sphere.

“I hated it. I was the type of col­lege stu­dent that would just be out on weeknights, hanging out with friends, and I felt like that’s it, my life is over,” he said. “Every­body says col­lege is sup­posed to be amaz­ing. I was like, this is great, but I’m go­ing to get out of here and real­ize I didn’t make any friends—or get to do any­thing.”

But he had signed the con­tract with UPS that said they would pay for his semester, and if he dropped the job, he’d have to re­pay the com­pany. So he stuck with it. And things star­ted get­ting less miser­able. He got a lucky break when he got trans­ferred to a dif­fer­ent de­part­ment that sor­ted ir­reg­u­lar pack­ages, where the work ten­ded to be slower and he some­times even had some time to study. He even con­tin­ued to do a second job, work­ing at a kiosk at a mall, to earn more money.

Ly­al­in had to quit the UPS job after he de­cided to study en­gin­eer­ing. The classes and home­work re­quired to study cal­cu­lus and phys­ics re­quired Ly­al­in’s full brain power, and he found it was all but im­possible to have the ca­pa­city to do the course work on no sleep. He did it for one semester, and it was hell. He’d work un­til 5 a.m. and then sleep un­til cal­cu­lus class at 9 a.m., and be up for the rest of the day study­ing and work­ing. The worst was every Tues­day when there would be a cal­cu­lus test at 8 a.m. His GPA began to tumble.

“It was two hours of sleep every night for the whole semester,” he said. “It was the hard­est thing I’ve ever had to do.”

When he stopped work­ing for UPS, his life changed. He joined a fra­tern­ity, star­ted in­tern­ing with an en­gin­eer­ing com­pany, fin­ished his bach­el­or’s, and then got his mas­ter’s in en­gin­eer­ing.

But what fas­cin­ates me about Ly­al­in is that he looks back fondly on his time at UPS, and some­times kicks him­self for drop­ping it. Yes, he drank en­ergy drinks to stay up, and, yes, his teeth rot­ted from those en­ergy drinks, and yes, he some­times had to drink NyQuil to make him­self sleep at 6 in the morn­ing, and yes, his course­work suffered, but he got two years of col­lege, for free, saved up a lot of money and be­came more dis­cip­lined about sleep and home­work.

Yes, com­ing from a low-in­come fam­ily changed his col­lege ex­per­i­ence, he said, but money changes everything. If money wer­en’t an ob­ject, he would have stud­ied polit­ics in­stead of en­gin­eer­ing, for in­stance. And he’d tried to re­duce the role money played in his col­lege ex­per­i­ence: He’d ap­plied to schol­ar­ships and grants be­fore col­lege, and had even been a fi­nal­ist for one, but didn’t re­ceive a penny in fin­an­cial aid.

Now, Ly­al­in has $30,000 in loans to pay off from the rest of his school­ing. He has a job in Louis­ville, and is glad he went to col­lege. But when he looks back, he’s thank­ful he had UPS, miser­able as it was at the time. When all is said and done, he prefers the night shift to the loans that now hov­er over him, and will, he says, for many years.

“The loans are much worse than work­ing there,” he told me. “I just feel like I’m caged in.”

Friends who don’t have loans are buy­ing houses, ad­opt­ing dogs, trav­el­ing the world. Even though he has a good job and man­aged to get through col­lege and gradu­ate, with much of his tu­ition covered, Ly­al­in is still pay­ing the price for be­ing poor.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Pulls the Plug on Infrastructure
58 minutes ago
Tubman $20 Bill Won't Be Unveiled Next Year
1 hours ago
Parties Go to Court Today Over Trump Banking Records
2 hours ago
Eastern Virginia Medical School Cannot Say if Northam Was in Photo
2 hours ago
Attorney General Beshear Wins Right to Face Matt Bevin
2 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.