Pence’s 2012 Opponent: Rematch Interest ‘Heightened’ by Indiana Religious Freedom Controversy

Democrat John Gregg said the new law has pushed him further toward opposing Gov. Mike Pence a second time.

Pence: Ready to rumble.
National Journal
March 31, 2015, 10:42 a.m.

In­di­ana Gov. Mike Pence’s Demo­crat­ic op­pon­ent from 2012 said Tues­day that Pence’s de­cision to sign a con­tro­ver­sial re­li­gious free­dom bill has “heightened” his in­terest in chal­len­ging Pence again in 2016.

“I was con­sid­er­ing it, and this has only heightened my con­sid­er­a­tion of it,” Demo­crat John Gregg, the mus­ta­chioed former state House speak­er, told Na­tion­al Journ­al.

Gregg lost to Pence by just over three per­cent­age points in 2012.

Pence has been at the cen­ter of grow­ing con­tro­versy since last week, when he signed off on the state’s Re­li­gious Free­dom Res­tor­a­tion Act, which op­pon­ents fear could leg­al­ize dis­crim­in­a­tion against gays and les­bi­ans. Dur­ing a press con­fer­ence Tues­day, Pence called on the state le­gis­lature to pass a fix by the end of this week that clearly es­tab­lishes that the bill does not al­low for dis­crim­in­a­tion, but the dam­age may already have been done. The meas­ure at­trac­ted na­tion­al at­ten­tion and promp­ted po­ten­tial 2016 pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates to weigh in.

Gregg said he’d been busy field­ing calls over the past few days from people en­cour­aging him to chal­lenge Pence, in­clud­ing mem­bers of In­di­ana’s busi­ness com­munity who have vo­cally op­posed the re­li­gious free­dom bill from its in­cep­tion.

“I’m look­ing at it, and I have had a num­ber of calls from non-tra­di­tion­al sup­port­ers want­ing me to take a look at it,” Gregg said in an in­ter­view. “And by that I ba­sic­ally mean a lot of busi­ness people, a lot of mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans, have called, emailed, and texted. I can’t even be­gin to tell you.”

Gregg wouldn’t of­fer a hard an­swer on wheth­er he in­tends to chal­lenge Pence, but his web­site, gregg­for­gov­ernor.com, is splashed with the text: “Big news is right around the corner.” Gregg ad­voc­ated for a full re­peal of the re­li­gious free­dom bill in a post on his Face­book page this week.

Can­did­ates for statewide of­fice in In­di­ana are barred from fun­drais­ing dur­ing the le­gis­lat­ive ses­sion, which ends April 29. That leaves pro­spect­ive can­did­ates with little in­cent­ive to an­nounce their plans be­fore then.

Jes­sica Mar­tin, a spokes­per­son for the In­di­ana Demo­crat­ic Party, said Pence’s de­cision to sign the bill and sub­sequent hand­ling of the fal­lout has “really en­er­gized and mo­tiv­ated people like noth­ing we’ve seen in a while.” But keep­ing in­terest up in a state that Re­pub­lic­ans have dom­in­ated re­cently is an­oth­er is­sue.

“The ques­tion is how do we mo­bil­ize people, how do we keep them en­gaged head­ing in­to 2015 with our mu­ni­cip­al elec­tions and 2016, with the gubernat­ori­al,” Mar­tin said.

Next year’s gubernat­ori­al race will be the first in In­di­ana since same-sex mar­riage was leg­al­ized there in Oc­to­ber. Both Pence and Gregg op­posed gay mar­riage in the 2012 race, while Demo­crat­ic Sen. Joe Don­nelly op­posed it dur­ing his 2012 run but came out in sup­port in spring 2013.

The In­di­ana Demo­crat­ic Party ad­op­ted sup­port for same-sex mar­riage in their party plat­form for the first time in 2014, but Gregg has not yet in­dic­ated if his stance has changed since he last ran. “Here in In­di­ana, now that we have gay mar­riage and now that sup­port­ing gay mar­riage is part of the Demo­crat­ic Party plat­form, can­did­ates are go­ing to have to state wheth­er they’re for or against gay mar­riage now,” Mar­tin said. “That’s just the real­ity. It’s not just here, it’s across the coun­try.”

What We're Following See More »
AMONG INVESTIGATION'S LAST KNOWN INTERVIEWS
Mueller Has Interviewed Press Sec. Sarah Sanders
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has interviewed White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, she told CNN on Friday...The interview is one of the final known interviews by Mueller's team. It was conducted late last year, around the same time as the special counsel interviewed then-White House chief of staff John Kelly, well after a number of other senior officials, including former White House communications director Hope Hicks and former press secretary Sean Spicer, were brought in for questioning."

Source:
AG BECERRA CALLS TRUMP'S PLAN A 'FOOLISH PROPOSAL'
Gov. Newsom Says California Will Sue Trump Over Emergency Declaration
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Gov. Gavin Newsom said Friday that California was planning to sue the Trump administration over its declaration of a national emergency on the southern border with Mexico, delivering on a promise state Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra made last week 'to reject this foolish proposal in court the moment it touches the ground.'...'No other state is going to be impacted by this declaration of emergency more than the state of California,' the governor said. Becerra said attorneys were reviewing the declaration and would develop the legal argument to take to court in the near future."

Source:
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
JUDGE SIDES WITH MUELLER
Stone Under Gag Order
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A federal judge on Friday ordered Roger Stone, his attorneys and the special counsel’s office to halt all public commentary about the case involving charges that the longtime Donald Trump associate lied to Congress and obstructed its Russia investigation. In a four-page order, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson sided with Mueller that Stone and his attorneys 'must refrain from making statements to the media or in public settings that pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to this case.'"

Source:
HAS NOT BEEN INCLUDED SINCE 1950
Supreme Court Will Rule on Census Citizenship Question
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Supreme Court added a politically explosive case to its low-profile docket Friday, agreeing to decide by the end of June whether the Trump administration can add a question about citizenship to the 2020 Census form sent to every American household. The census hasn’t asked the question of each household since 1950, and a federal judge last month stopped the Commerce Department from adding it to the upcoming count. He questioned the motives of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, and said the secretary broke a 'veritable smorgasbord' of federal rules by overriding the advice of career officials."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login