Where the 2016 Republicans Stand on NSA Spying

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
April 5, 2015, 4 p.m.

Nearly two years after Ed­ward Snowden hood­winked the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency, the GOP still has failed to re­con­cile its dif­fer­ences on sur­veil­lance policy. Nowhere is that more clear than a sur­vey of Re­pub­lic­ans eye­ing the White House.

In one corner, Jeb Bush, Marco Ru­bio, and Chris Christie make up the GOP’s wing of tra­di­tion­al de­fense hawks, vo­ci­fer­ously de­fend­ing mass phone and In­ter­net spy­ing as ne­ces­sary to keep Amer­ic­ans safe from ter­ror­ist at­tacks. In the oth­er, Rand Paul and Ted Cruz lead a tea party-in­fused fac­tion clam­or­ing to keep Big Broth­er’s pry­ing eyes and ears far away from private con­ver­sa­tions.

But no two can­did­ates are per­fectly alike, and many have yet to weigh in spe­cific­ally on the NSA’s most con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­gram—its bulk col­lec­tion of US phone call metadata. As cam­paigns kick off and de­bates loom, each Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial con­tender will have to an­swer: Where do you stand on the NSA?


Contributions by Andrew McGill

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.