The Congressional Jigsaw: Needy Democratic Moderates

National Journal
Feb. 27, 2009, 7 p.m.

2008 Vote Rat­ing­sCon­gres­sion­al Jig­saw”¢ In­tro­duc­tion
“¢ Po­lar­ized Re­pub­lic­ans
“¢ De­term­ined Demo­crat­ic Lib­er­als

“¢ How Vote Rat­ings Are Done
“¢ Key Vote De­scrip­tions

“¢ Sen­ate Rat­ings
“¢ House Rat­ings
“¢ Sen­ate Twins
“¢ Sen­ate Odd Couples
“¢ State Del­eg­a­tions In The House
“¢ House’s Ideo­lo­gic­al Caucuses

Pre­vi­ous Vote Rat­ings:
“¢ 2007 Vote Rat­ings
“¢ 2006 Vote Rat­ings
“¢ 2005 Vote Rat­ings
“¢ 2004 Vote Rat­ings

“¢ Back To Main Page

At the oth­er end of the Demo­crat­ic Caucus from Honda is Rep. Jason Alt­mire, D-Pa., whose com­pos­ite scores are an even 50.0, put­ting him at the cen­ter of the House. His pro-gun, anti-abor­tion, hard-line im­mig­ra­tion stances play well in his Re­pub­lic­an-lean­ing dis­trict. “Am­nesty? Folks in my dis­trict aren’t go­ing to go for that,” Alt­mire said. “Any bill — no mat­ter how hard-line it is on im­mig­ra­tion — that in­cludes that… is go­ing to be real tough for me to sup­port.”

Last year, con­gres­sion­al Demo­crat­ic lead­ers sched­uled very few votes on con­tro­ver­sial so­cial is­sues that might split their party. One view is that the lead­ers avoided such hot-but­ton sub­jects be­cause they didn’t want to force Demo­crats in GOP-lean­ing dis­tricts to make tough votes — and po­ten­tially risk the party’s ma­jor­ity in the pro­cess. Alt­mire has a dif­fer­ent the­ory. “The reas­on, in my opin­ion, they didn’t have those votes is be­cause they wouldn’t have won them,” he said.

A case in point was a 2008 bill that Alt­mire co-sponsored, backed by the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation, to over­turn the Dis­trict of Columbia’s gun con­trol laws. The House passed the bill 260-160, with 82 Demo­crats and 178 Re­pub­lic­ans form­ing the win­ning co­ali­tion. Alt­mire be­lieves that his po­s­i­tion would pre­vail this year too, even with few­er Re­pub­lic­ans in Con­gress. “I would ex­pect guns and im­mig­ra­tion still would fa­vor the con­ser­vat­ive side,” he said.

Last year, House Demo­crat­ic lead­ers could af­ford to lose only 18 of their rank-and-file mem­bers and still win votes without any Re­pub­lic­an sup­port. And the lead­ers did lose at times: Of the key votes used in the 2008 rat­ings, Re­pub­lic­ans de­feated a ma­jor­ity of Demo­crats by sway­ing Demo­crat­ic cent­rists on such is­sues as busi­ness reg­u­la­tion, na­tion­al se­cur­ity, gun con­trol, and fisc­al dis­cip­line. But after pick­ing up 21 ad­di­tion­al seats in Novem­ber, House Demo­crat­ic lead­ers have shown a will­ing­ness to press for more-lib­er­al le­gis­la­tion, start­ing with the stim­u­lus pack­age.

Mod­er­ate Demo­crats worry that their lead­ers and the White House may push too far to the left this year. “As long as 39 of us are co­hes­ive and hold firm, the Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship will have to work with us to mol­li­fy our con­cerns to en­sure they have the votes to pass le­gis­la­tion,” said Rep. Stephanie Her­seth Sand­lin, D-S.D., co-chair of the 49-mem­ber Blue Dog Co­ali­tion of mod­er­ate House Demo­crats. She was the 15th-most-con­ser­vat­ive House Demo­crat in the 2008 rat­ings.

Her­seth Sand­lin said that mod­er­ate Demo­crats want to see le­gis­la­tion de­veloped with their in­put from start to fin­ish through the reg­u­lar com­mit­tee pro­cess, rather than just at the end after lib­er­al lead­ers have ne­go­ti­ated bills be­hind closed doors. “Even if we’re un­com­fort­able with cer­tain ele­ments in the fi­nal pack­age, we will have had that op­por­tun­ity to in­flu­ence the le­gis­la­tion in a way that makes sense for our con­stitu­ents and makes sense for our prin­ciples,” she said.

In the Sen­ate, the sup­port of mod­er­ate Demo­crats is cru­cial to Obama and Demo­crat­ic lead­ers be­cause their party is two votes short of the 60-vote threshold needed to break fili­busters. Those num­bers give the cham­ber’s mod­er­ate Demo­crats even more ne­go­ti­at­ing power than their House coun­ter­parts.

In the key votes used in the 2008 rat­ings, Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic cent­rists oc­ca­sion­ally voted against their lead­ers, in­clud­ing these three out­liers, who ranked as the first-, second-, and third-most-con­ser­vat­ive Demo­crats, re­spect­ively, in their cham­ber.

“¢ Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., whose con­cerns over fisc­al dis­cip­line res­ul­ted in his be­ing the only Demo­crat to vote against the ma­jor­ity’s budget res­ol­u­tion — usu­ally a test of party loy­alty.

“¢ Sen. Ben Nel­son, D-Neb., who was among a hand­ful of Demo­crats to op­pose a meas­ure in March ex­pand­ing so­cial safety net pro­grams by rais­ing taxes on mil­lion­aires. “I am a fisc­al con­ser­vat­ive,” he said. “I am very con­cerned about spend­ing.”

“¢ Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., whose in­creas­ingly Re­pub­lic­an home state is an oil and gas pro­du­cer, lead­ing her to en­dorse con­ser­vat­ive po­s­i­tions on en­ergy le­gis­la­tion in par­tic­u­lar.

Al­though fisc­al dis­cip­line is a key stick­ing point for mod­er­ate Sen­ate Demo­crats, their op­pos­i­tion could kill le­gis­la­tion on is­sues ran­ging from abor­tion rights to im­mig­ra­tion re­form. Nel­son, for ex­ample, ad­voc­ated less spend­ing on school con­struc­tion in this year’s stim­u­lus pack­age be­cause of con­ser­vat­ive-style wor­ries about loc­al con­trol of edu­ca­tion. “I’m philo­soph­ic­ally con­cerned about hav­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment hav­ing much more to do with K-12 edu­ca­tion,” he said.

Rep. Bruce Bra­ley, D-Iowa, a second-term mem­ber whose vote rat­ings were lib­er­al on so­cial and for­eign policy but mod­er­ate on eco­nom­ic is­sues, re­cently formed a Pop­u­list Caucus aimed at de­vel­op­ing policy po­s­i­tions that Demo­crats of all stripes can agree on. “There isn’t really a lot of dis­agree­ment on some of these core eco­nom­ic middle-class val­ues,” Bra­ley said, point­ing to such is­sues as middle-class tax cuts, af­ford­able health care, and con­sumer pro­tec­tion.

But Bra­ley ac­know­ledged that ideo­lo­gic­al dif­fer­ences will pose a chal­lenge as he and oth­ers seek to build win­ning co­ali­tions in this Con­gress. “The great thing about Demo­crats is, some­times we agree to dis­agree,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
SCOTUS Will Hear DC Sniper Case
4 hours ago

"The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider Virginia’s plea to reinstate the life-without-parole sentence of a man who as a teenager participated in sniper shootings that terrorized the Washington, D.C., region in 2002. The justices said they will take up the state’s appeal in the case of Lee Boyd Malvo, who was 17 when he and John Allen Muhammad fatally shot 10 people in Maryland, Virginia and Washington. Malvo was sentenced to life-without-parole terms in Virginia and in Maryland, and Muhammad was sentenced to death and was executed in 2009. Malvo was sentenced to four life terms for crimes he committed in Virginia. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled last year that while Malvo’s life-without-parole sentences were legal when they were imposed."

U.S. Grand Jury Seeks info on How 737 MAX Is Made
5 hours ago

"Federal prosecutors and Department of Transportation officials are scrutinizing the development of Boeing Co.’s 737 MAX jetliners, according to people familiar with the matter, unusual inquiries that come amid probes of regulators’ safety approvals of the new plane. A grand jury in Washington, D.C., issued a broad subpoena dated March 11 to at least one person involved in the 737 MAX’s development, seeking related documents, including correspondence, emails and other messages."

MBS Stripped of Some Powers
5 hours ago

"The heir to the Saudi throne has not attended a series of high-profile ministerial and diplomatic meetings in Saudi Arabia over the last fortnight and is alleged to have been stripped of some of his financial and economic authority, the Guardian has been told. The move to restrict, if only temporarily, the responsibilities of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is understood to have been revealed to a group of senior ministers earlier last week by his father, King Salman."

Mass Shooting in Dutch City of Utrecht
5 hours ago
Feds Raided Broidy's Offices Last Year
5 hours ago

"Federal authorities raided the office of Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy last summer, seeking records related to his dealings with foreign officials and Trump administration associates, according to a sealed search warrant obtained by ProPublica. Agents were authorized to use the megadonor’s hands and face to unlock any phones that required fingerprint or facial scans."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.